Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 3Dietary Effects on HealthOvarian function and disordersHypothalamic control of reproductive hormones

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 32 of the 33 references it cites were found in a registry or an index, and 1 are not checked yet; none of the 175 sources its claims cite is checked for support yet.

Effects of Intermittent Fasting on Male and Female Reproductive Hormones, Fertility, and Sexual Function: A Comprehensive Review with Emphasis on the Existing Evidence Gap in Women

Open access
La Vignera, Sandro, Condorelli, Rosita A.·2026·Nutrients

Abstract

Intermittent fasting (IF) has emerged as a popular dietary intervention with potential metabolic and endocrine benefits. However, its effects on sexual function and reproductive health remain incompletely understood. This comprehensive review synthesizes current evidence from human clinical trials and animal studies examining the impact of various IF protocols—including time-restricted eating (TRE), alternate-day fasting (ADF), and Ramadan fasting—on male and female sexual function, reproductive hormones, and fertility outcomes. In males, limited human data suggest preserved erectile function but reduced sexual desire during Ramadan fasting, with neutral effects on testosterone in obese adults undergoing TRE. Animal studies demonstrate context-dependent effects, with IF protecting against high-fat diet-induced reproductive dysfunction while potentially impairing spermatogenesis under prolonged energy restriction. In females, IF shows promise for improving hyperandrogenism and menstrual regularity in polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS), mediated by enhanced insulin sensitivity and reduced free androgen index. However, direct measurements of female sexual function domains (libido, arousal, lubrication, orgasm) are largely absent from the literature. Mechanistic pathways involve modulation of the hypothalamic–pituitary–gonadal (HPG) axis, insulin–adipokine signaling, sex hormone-binding globulin (SHBG), and oxidative stress pathways. Evidence quality is limited by small sample sizes, heterogeneous protocols, short follow-up periods, and predominance of animal data. While IF may offer reproductive benefits in metabolically compromised populations, particularly women with PCOS, caution is warranted in young, lean, or energy-deficient individuals. Future research should employ standardized IF protocols, validated sexual function instruments, and long-term fertility endpoints to establish evidence-based clinical recommendations.

Checked 2026-11-14 · 1 reference not checked yet

Overview

CoChat Summary

TL;DR

This comprehensive review finds that intermittent fasting (IF) has context-dependent effects on reproductive hormones, fertility, and sexual function, with the strongest evidence for metabolic and hormonal benefits in women with PCOS. However, direct validated data on female sexual function are entirely absent, and male libido findings derive almost exclusively from Ramadan fasting, limiting generalizability to TRE or ADF.

Key findings

  • From 1,247 records, 37 studies were included. In males, one Ramadan study of 45 healthy married men found significantly reduced sexual desire (p = 0.002) and intercourse frequency (p = 0.046), but no significant change in erectile function (p = 0.714); FSH decreased significantly (p = 0.016), while testosterone and LH were unchanged.
  • A 12-month RCT in 90 adults with obesity found that 8 h time-restricted eating produced weight loss but no changes in total testosterone or SHBG in males, suggesting hormonal neutrality in obese men.
  • In women with PCOS, a 6-week 8 h time-restricted feeding study of 30 women significantly reduced AMH, FSH, LH, estradiol, prolactin, total testosterone, and free testosterone (all p < 0.001, except FSH p = 0.002 and prolactin p = 0.038), decreased free androgen index (p < 0.001), increased SHBG (p < 0.001), reduced hyperandrogenism (p = 0.016), and normalized menstrual cycles in over 70%.
  • No identified study assessed female sexual function domains (desire, arousal, lubrication, orgasm, satisfaction, dyspareunia) using validated instruments such as the FSFI under any IF protocol; all conclusions about female sexual function are inferential from hormonal and metabolic surrogates.

Methods

  • Comprehensive literature search across PubMed, Google Scholar, SciSpace, and full-text repositories from database inception to March 2025, restricted to English-language studies, using keywords for IF protocols and sexual/reproductive outcomes.
  • Two-stage screening identified 1,247 records; after removing 312 duplicates and screening 935 titles/abstracts, 87 full texts were assessed and 37 studies were included.
  • Narrative synthesis organized by sex and outcome domain; study quality was characterized as strong, moderate, limited, or insufficient based on sample size, controls, randomization, follow-up, validated measures, and confounding. The review was not prospectively registered in PROSPERO.

Limitations

  • The paper explicitly states limitations including small sample sizes, short follow-up, heterogeneous IF protocols, lack of validated sexual function measures, absence of direct fertility endpoints (pregnancy/live birth), predominance of animal data, potential publication bias, and inadequate control for weight loss, diet composition, exercise, sleep, and psychosocial factors.
  • The authors emphasize two critical limitations: no published study directly assessed female sexual function under IF using validated instruments, and Ramadan fasting findings cannot be generalized to secular TRE or ADF because of mandatory sexual abstinence, fluid restriction, sleep disruption, and religious context.
  • Evident from the text: the review is narrative rather than meta-analytic, quality assessment is not described as using a formal standardized tool, and most human evidence is in obese or PCOS populations, leaving lean, young, and non-PCOS women underrepresented.

Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3390/nu18111817

Cites

32 of 33 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Nothing to recompute.

Figures

Figure 1 PRISMA 2020 flow diagram of the literature search and study selection process. Records were identified from three databases: PubMed (n = 412), Google Scholar (n = 380), and SciSpace (n = 455), yielding 1247 total records. After removal of duplicates (n = 312), 935 records were screened by title and abstract, of which 848 were excluded. A total of 87 full-text articles were assessed for eligibility; 50 were excluded due to absence of an intermittent fasting intervention (n = 18), absence of sexual or reproductive outcomes (n = 22), or insufficient methodological detail (n = 10). Thirty-seven studies were ultimately included in the review.
Figure 1 PRISMA 2020 flow diagram of the literature search and study selection process. Records were identified from three databases: PubMed (n = 412), Google Scholar (n = 380), and SciSpace (n = 455), yielding 1247 total records. After removal of duplicates (n = 312), 935 records were screened by title and abstract, of which 848 were excluded. A total of 87 full-text articles were assessed for eligibility; 50 were excluded due to absence of an intermittent fasting intervention (n = 18), absence of sexual or reproductive outcomes (n = 22), or insufficient methodological detail (n = 10). Thirty-seven studies were ultimately included in the review.CC BY · PubMed Central
Figure 2 Intermittent fasting effects on sexual function. Biological mechanisms by which intermittent fasting (IF) affects male and female sexual function. The central panel illustrates IF protocols (16:8 TRF, ADF, 5:2) and their metabolic effects (reduced insulin resistance, decreased adipose tissue, improved insulin sensitivity) and adipokine changes (↓ leptin, ↑ adiponectin, regulated ghrelin). Left panel: Male HPG axis effects on testosterone, LH, FSH, and SHBG, with downstream outcomes on erectile function, sperm quality, and libido. Right panel: Female HPG axis effects on estrogen, progesterone, LH/FSH ratio, AMH, and menstrual cycle regularity, with downstream outcomes on libido, arousal, lubrication, orgasm, and dyspareunia. Green arrows = stimulatory/positive regulatory pathways; Red arrows = inhibitory/negative regulatory pathways. TRF = time-restricted feeding; ADF = alternate-day fasting; HPG = hypothalamic–pituitary–gonadal; LH = luteinizing hormone; FSH = follicle-stimulating hormone; SHBG = sex hormone-binding globulin; AMH = anti-Müllerian hormone.
Figure 2 Intermittent fasting effects on sexual function. Biological mechanisms by which intermittent fasting (IF) affects male and female sexual function. The central panel illustrates IF protocols (16:8 TRF, ADF, 5:2) and their metabolic effects (reduced insulin resistance, decreased adipose tissue, improved insulin sensitivity) and adipokine changes (↓ leptin, ↑ adiponectin, regulated ghrelin). Left panel: Male HPG axis effects on testosterone, LH, FSH, and SHBG, with downstream outcomes on erectile function, sperm quality, and libido. Right panel: Female HPG axis effects on estrogen, progesterone, LH/FSH ratio, AMH, and menstrual cycle regularity, with downstream outcomes on libido, arousal, lubrication, orgasm, and dyspareunia. Green arrows = stimulatory/positive regulatory pathways; Red arrows = inhibitory/negative regulatory pathways. TRF = time-restricted feeding; ADF = alternate-day fasting; HPG = hypothalamic–pituitary–gonadal; LH = luteinizing hormone; FSH = follicle-stimulating hormone; SHBG = sex hormone-binding globulin; AMH = anti-Müllerian hormone.CC BY · PubMed Central

Verification

Claims the paper makes

0 Valid · 2 Not valid · 143 Not checked · 52 Own results and interpretations

133 more claims

Create a free account to see all 197 claims and to verify the 161 references still open.

See all claims — free account
  • It may state two separate claims as one. 48
  • Probably not a substantial claim. 16

Create a free account to see these claims.

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

Each contradiction between two passages listed here was confirmed by an independent check.

4 of 4

Citations

Cites

Show all 32 references

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. Plant, T.M., and Zeleznik, A.J. (2015). Knobil and Neill’s Physiology of Reproduction, Academic Press. [4th ed.].
  2. 2013, Effect of Ramadan Fasting on Sex Hormones in Infertile Male, Tikrit J. Pharm. Sci., 9, 277
  3. Omolaso, 2012, Evaluation of the Effects of Fasting on Fertility in Adult Male Wistar Rats, IOSR J. Pharm. Biol. Sci., 3, 12

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
La Vignera, S., & Condorelli, R. A.
Affiliations
  • Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, University of Catania, 95123 Catania, Italy
  • University of Catania (IT)
Venue
Nutrients
Publisher
MDPI AG
Published
2026-06-04
Volume
18
Issue
11
Pages
1817
ISSN
2072-6643 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W7163544285
Cited by
3
References
32
Citations by year
2026: 3
FWCI
2.35
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Nutrients (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology (medical) › Dietary Effects on Health
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Reproductive Medicine › Ovarian function and disorders
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Reproductive Medicine › Hypothalamic control of reproductive hormones
Keywords
intermittent fasting, reproductive hormones, fertility, sexual function, time-restricted eating, alternate-day fasting, Ramadan fasting, erectile function, testosterone, spermatogenesis, polycystic ovary syndrome, hyperandrogenism, menstrual cycle regularity, hypothalamic-pituitary-gonadal axis, sex hormone-binding globulin, insulin sensitivity, oxidative stress, caloric restriction, obesity, women's reproductive health
MeSH terms
Intermittent Fasting, Animals, Female, Fertility, Humans, Male, Sexual Behavior

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

A language model drew the claims from the paper on 2026-11-14, under version 3 of the claim definition (model deepseek-v4.1-flash, prompt extract-v3).

A second model labelled each claim on 2026-11-14 (model jev-1.13-20260917, definition revision gold-guideline-v0.2).

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.