Cited by 97Sports Performance and TrainingMuscle metabolism and nutritionThermoregulation and physiological responses

Can Carbohydrate Mouth Rinse Improve Performance during Exercise? A Systematic Review

Open access
De Ataide e Silva, Thays, Di Cavalcanti Alves de Souza, Maria, De Amorim, Jamile, Stathis, Christos, Leandro, Carol, Lima-Silva, Adriano·2013·Nutrients

Abstract

The purpose of this review was to identify studies that have investigated the effect of carbohydrate (CHO) mouth rinse on exercise performance, and to quantify the overall mean difference of this type of manipulation across the studies. The main mechanisms involving the potential benefit of CHO mouth rinse on performance was also explored. A systematic review was conducted in the following electronic databases: PubMed, SciELO, Science Direct, MEDLINE, and the Cochrane Library (Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials), without limit of searches. Eleven studies were classified as appropriate and their results were summarized and compared. In nine of them, CHO mouth rinse increased the performance (range from 1.50% to 11.59%) during moderate- to high-intensity exercise (~75% Wmax or 65% VO2max, ~1 h duration). A statistical analysis to quantify the individual and overall mean differences was performed in seven of the 11 eligible studies that reported power output (watts, W) as the main performance outcome. The overall mean difference was calculated using a random-effect model that accounts for true variation in effects occurring in each study, as well as random error within a single study. The overall effect of CHO mouth rinse on performance was significant (mean difference = 5.05 W, 95% CI 0.90 to 9.2 W, z = 2.39, p = 0.02) but there was a large heterogeneity between the studies (I2 = 52%). An activation of the oral receptors and consequently brain areas involved with reward (insula/operculum frontal, orbitofrontal cortex, and striatum) is suggested as a possible physiological mechanism responsible for the improved performance with CHO mouth rinse. However, this positive effect seems to be accentuated when muscle and liver glycogen stores are reduced, possibly due to a greater sensitivity of the oral receptors, and require further investigation. Differences in duration of fasting before the trial, duration of mouth rinse, type of activity, exercise protocols, and sample size may account for the large variability between the studies.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3390/nu6010001

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The ergogenic effect of carbohydrate mouth rinsing is thought to arise from stimulation of carbohydrate-sensitive receptors in the oral cavity, which activate brain regions involved in motor control and motivation.

    “This ergogenic effect is thought to arise from the stimulation of carbohydrate‐sensitive receptors in the oral cavity, which activate brain regions involved in motor control and motivation [77, 78].”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 21 · Cited by 97

Authors
De Ataide e Silva, T., Di Cavalcanti Alves de Souza, M., De Amorim, J., Stathis, C., Leandro, C., & Lima-Silva, A.
Affiliations
  • Sport Science Research Group, Department of Physical Education and Sports Science (CAV), Federal University of Pernambuco, Alto do Reservatório street, Bela Vista, Vitória de Santo Antão, Pernambuco 55608-680, Brazil
  • Victoria University (AU)
  • Universidade Federal de Pernambuco (BR)
Venue
Nutrients
Publisher
MDPI AG
Published
2013-12-19
Volume
6
Issue
1
Pages
1-10
ISSN
2072-6643 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2048172163
Cited by
97
References
21
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 13 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 15 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 3 · 2012: 1
FWCI
0.61
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Nutrients (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Victoria University Research Repository (Victoria University) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Orthopedics and Sports Medicine › Sports Performance and Training
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cell Biology › Muscle metabolism and nutrition
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Thermoregulation and physiological responses
Keywords
carbohydrate mouth rinse, exercise performance, oral glucose, brain reward system, glycogen depletion, output power, endurance exercise
MeSH terms
Glucose, Humans, Mouth, Physical Endurance, Polysaccharides, Exercise, Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review