The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Bacterial Antibiotic Resistance: The Most Critical Pathogens
Open accessAbstract
Antibiotics have made it possible to treat bacterial infections such as meningitis and bacteraemia that, prior to their introduction, were untreatable and consequently fatal. Unfortunately, in recent decades overuse and misuse of antibiotics as well as social and economic factors have accelerated the spread of antibiotic-resistant bacteria, making drug treatment ineffective. Currently, at least 700,000 people worldwide die each year due to antimicrobial resistance (AMR). Without new and better treatments, the World Health Organization (WHO) predicts that this number could rise to 10 million by 2050, highlighting a health concern not of secondary importance. In February 2017, in light of increasing antibiotic resistance, the WHO published a list of pathogens that includes the pathogens designated by the acronym ESKAPE (Enterococcus faecium, Staphylococcus aureus, Klebsiella pneumoniae, Acinetobacter baumannii, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, and Enterobacter species) to which were given the highest “priority status” since they represent the great threat to humans. Understanding the resistance mechanisms of these bacteria is a key step in the development of new antimicrobial drugs to tackle drug-resistant bacteria. In this review, both the mode of action and the mechanisms of resistance of commonly used antimicrobials will be examined. It also discusses the current state of AMR in the most critical resistant bacteria as determined by the WHO’s global priority pathogens list.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Mechanisms of vancomycin resistance in Staphylococcus aureus
Gardete, S., & Tomasz, A. (2014) · Journal of Clinical Investigation · doi:10.1172/jci68834 · Cited by 565
Mechanisms and clinical relevance of bacterial heteroresistance
Andersson, D. I., Nicoloff, H., & Hjort, K. (2019) · Nature Reviews Microbiology · doi:10.1038/s41579-019-0218-1 · Cited by 513
Zaheer, R., Cook, S. R., Barbieri, R., Goji, N., Cameron, A., Petkau, A., Polo, R. O., Tymensen, L., Stamm, C., Song, J., et al. (2020) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-020-61002-5 · Cited by 262
Cited by
Progress in Alternative Strategies to Combat Antimicrobial Resistance: Focus on Antibiotics
Murugaiyan, J., Kumar, P. A., Rao, G. S., Iskandar, K., Hawser, S., Hays, J. P., Mohsen, Y., Adukkadukkam, S., Awuah, W. A., Jose, R. A. M., et al. (2022) · Antibiotics · doi:10.3390/antibiotics11020200 · Cited by 567
Urinary Tract Infections: The Current Scenario and Future Prospects
Mancuso, G., Midiri, A., Gerace, E., Marra, M., Zummo, S., & Biondo, C. (2023) · Pathogens · doi:10.3390/pathogens12040623 · Cited by 396
Self-citationReview and Comparison of Antimicrobial Resistance Gene Databases
Papp, M., & Solymosi, N. (2022) · Antibiotics · doi:10.3390/antibiotics11030339 · Cited by 96
Malik, M. A., Albeladi, S. S., Al-Maaqar, S. M., Alshehri, A. A., Al-Thabaiti, S. A., Khan, I., & Kamli, M. R. (2023) · Life · doi:10.3390/life13030653 · Cited by 66
Naik, G. A. R. R., Roy, A. A., Mutalik, S., & Dhas, N. (2024) · International Journal of Biological Macromolecules · doi:10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2024.134977 · Cited by 47
Metadata
- Authors
- Mancuso, G., Midiri, A., Gerace, E., & Biondo, C.
- Venue
- Pathogens
- Publisher
- MDPI AG
- Published
- 2021-10-12
- Volume
- 10
- Issue
- 10
- Pages
- 1310
- ISSN
- 2076-0817 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W3207421551
- Cited by
- 1,332
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 50.13
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Bacterial Antibiotic Resistance: The Most Critical Pathogens. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.3390/pathogens10101310
- The paper
- Mancuso, G., Midiri, A., Gerace, E., & Biondo, C. (2021). Bacterial Antibiotic Resistance: The Most Critical Pathogens. Pathogens. https://doi.org/10.3390/pathogens10101310
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.