Cited by 0Indoor Air Quality and Microbial ExposureHeavy metals in environmentPlant-Microbe Interactions and Immunity

Evaluating the Capability of Epipremnum aureum and Its Associated Phylloplane Microbiome to Capture Indoor Particulate Matter Bound Lead

Open access
Much, Diego G., Saran, Anabel, Merini, Luciano J., Vangronsveld, Jaco, Thijs, Sofie·2025·Plants

Abstract

In this study we evaluated over a 1-year period, the ability of Epipremnum aureum leaves to collect particulate matter (PM)-bound Pb from an indoor environment. Using Illumina MiSeq, we investigated the changes in the phylloplane microbiome connected with the accumulation of this pollutant. Plants were placed in a shooting room, where PM release from each shot was recorded, along with PM2.5 and PM10 sequestration and leaf element enrichment by ICP. Additionally, black carbon (BC) sequestration was determined, and SEM-EDX was performed on leaves after 12 months of exposure. Our results indicated that ambient air pollution shapes microbial leaf communities by affecting their diversity. At the order level, Pseudomonadales, along with Micrococcales, appeared (at a low relative abundance) after exposure to indoor PM-bound Pb air pollution. This study provides a unique comparison of Epipremnum aureum air filtration performance between a standard office environment and a firearm shooting range. The air filtration approach holds promise for reducing indoor air pollution, but more knowledge about the underlying mechanisms supporting genera capable of coping with airborne pollutants is still required.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3390/plants14192956

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 41

Authors
Much, D. G., Saran, A., Merini, L. J., Vangronsveld, J., & Thijs, S.
Affiliations
  • Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas (AR)
  • Maria Curie-Skłodowska University (PL)
  • Hasselt University (BE)
Corresponding author
  • Much, Diego G.
  • Saran, Anabel
Venue
Plants
Publisher
MDPI AG
Published
2025-09-23
Volume
14
Issue
19
Pages
2956
ISSN
2223-7747 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4414427462
Cited by
0
References
41
FWCI
0.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Plants (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Preprints.org (acceptedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Conicet (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Document Server@UHasselt (UHasselt) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
  • Pluriannual Projects of Investigation-CONICET (PIP-0768)
  • Special Research Fund (BOF), Hasselt University, Belgium (BOF22KV05)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis › Indoor Air Quality and Microbial Exposure
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Pollution › Heavy metals in environment
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Plant-Microbe Interactions and Immunity
Keywords
Epipremnum aureum, indoor particulate matter, lead sequestration, indoor air pollution, PM2.5, PM10, Pseudomonadales, Micrococcales, indoor air filtration

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review