Allelic Variants of CRISPR/Cas9 Induced Mutation in an Inositol Trisphosphate 5/6 Kinase Gene Manifest Different Phenotypes in Barley
Open accessAbstract
Inositol trisphosphate 5/6 kinases (ITPK) constitute a small group of enzymes participating in the sequential phosphorylation of inositol phosphate to inositol hexakisphosphate (IP6), which is a major storage form of phosphate in cereal grains. The development of lines with reduced IP6 content could enhance phosphate and mineral bioavailability. Moreover, plant ITPKs participate in abiotic stress signaling. To elucidate the role of HvITPK1 in IP6 synthesis and stress signaling, a barley itpk1 mutant was created using programmable nuclease Cas9. Homozygous single bp insertion and deletion mutant lines were obtained. The mutants contained altered levels of phosphate in the mature grains, ranging from 65% to 174% of the wild type (WT) content. Homozygous mutant lines were tested for their response to salinity during germination. Interestingly, insertion mutant lines revealed a higher tolerance to salinity stress than deletion mutants. Mature embryos of an insertion mutant itpk1-2 and deletion mutant itpk1-33 were cultivated in vitro on MS medium supplemented with NaCl at 50, 100, and 200 mM. While both mutants grew less well than WT on no or low salt concentrations, the itpk1-2 mutant was affected less than the WT and itpk33 when grown on the highest NaCl concentration. The expression of all ITPKs was induced in roots in response to salt stress. In shoots, the differential effect of high salt on IPTK expression in the two iptk1 mutants was consistent with their different sensitivities to salt stress. The results extend the evidence for the involvement of ITPK genes in phosphate storage and abiotic stress signaling.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Only Vlčko and Ohnoutková (2020), Fu et al. (2022), and Karunarathne et al. (2022) had used CRISPR/Cas9 for barley germplasm development.
“The CRISPR/Cas9 system is a more precise technique than overexpression, yet only Vlčko and Ohnoutková (2020), Fu et al. (2022), and Karunarathne et al. (2022) had used this technology for barley germplasm development (Table 1).”
From Genetic resources and precise gene editing for targeted improvement of barley abiotic stress tolerance (2023) · cites this paper as Vlčko and Ohnoutková (2020)
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 81 · Cited by 74
Research works printed but not linked: 1
- [1]Cosgrove D. Inositolhexakisphosphates Inositol Phosphates: Their Chemistry, Biochemistry and Physiology Cosgrove D. Elsevier Scientific Publishing Company New York, NY, USA 1980 26 43 0444418741
- Authors
- Vlčko, T., & Ohnoutková, L.
- Affiliations
- Czech Academy of Sciences (CZ)
- Corresponding author
- Ohnoutková, Ludmila
- Venue
- Plants
- Publisher
- MDPI AG
- Published
- 2020-02-05
- Volume
- 9
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 195
- ISSN
- 2223-7747 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC7076722
- OpenAlex
- W3004656553
- Cited by
- 74
- References
- 81
- Citations by year
- 2026: 12 · 2025: 18 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 15 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 1
- FWCI
- 5.33
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- dx.doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Plants (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- Funders
- European Regional Development Fund (CZ.02.1.01/0.0/0.0/16_019/0000738)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Plant Genetic and Mutation Studies
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Phytase and its Applications
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Plant Stress Responses and Tolerance
- Keywords
- barley, phytic acid, phosphate storage, salt tolerance, abiotic stress signaling, CRISPR/Cas9 mutagenesis, allelic variants
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review