Cited by 74Plant Genetic and Mutation StudiesPhytase and its ApplicationsPlant Stress Responses and Tolerance

Allelic Variants of CRISPR/Cas9 Induced Mutation in an Inositol Trisphosphate 5/6 Kinase Gene Manifest Different Phenotypes in Barley

Open access
Vlčko, Tomáš, Ohnoutková, Ludmila·2020·Plants

Abstract

Inositol trisphosphate 5/6 kinases (ITPK) constitute a small group of enzymes participating in the sequential phosphorylation of inositol phosphate to inositol hexakisphosphate (IP6), which is a major storage form of phosphate in cereal grains. The development of lines with reduced IP6 content could enhance phosphate and mineral bioavailability. Moreover, plant ITPKs participate in abiotic stress signaling. To elucidate the role of HvITPK1 in IP6 synthesis and stress signaling, a barley itpk1 mutant was created using programmable nuclease Cas9. Homozygous single bp insertion and deletion mutant lines were obtained. The mutants contained altered levels of phosphate in the mature grains, ranging from 65% to 174% of the wild type (WT) content. Homozygous mutant lines were tested for their response to salinity during germination. Interestingly, insertion mutant lines revealed a higher tolerance to salinity stress than deletion mutants. Mature embryos of an insertion mutant itpk1-2 and deletion mutant itpk1-33 were cultivated in vitro on MS medium supplemented with NaCl at 50, 100, and 200 mM. While both mutants grew less well than WT on no or low salt concentrations, the itpk1-2 mutant was affected less than the WT and itpk33 when grown on the highest NaCl concentration. The expression of all ITPKs was induced in roots in response to salt stress. In shoots, the differential effect of high salt on IPTK expression in the two iptk1 mutants was consistent with their different sensitivities to salt stress. The results extend the evidence for the involvement of ITPK genes in phosphate storage and abiotic stress signaling.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3390/plants9020195

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Only Vlčko and Ohnoutková (2020), Fu et al. (2022), and Karunarathne et al. (2022) had used CRISPR/Cas9 for barley germplasm development.

    “The CRISPR/Cas9 system is a more precise technique than overexpression, yet only Vlčko and Ohnoutková (2020), Fu et al. (2022), and Karunarathne et al. (2022) had used this technology for barley germplasm development (Table 1).”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 81 · Cited by 74

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [1]Cosgrove D. Inositolhexakisphosphates Inositol Phosphates: Their Chemistry, Biochemistry and Physiology Cosgrove D. Elsevier Scientific Publishing Company New York, NY, USA 1980 26 43 0444418741

Authors
Vlčko, T., & Ohnoutková, L.
Affiliations
Czech Academy of Sciences (CZ)
Corresponding author
Ohnoutková, Ludmila
Venue
Plants
Publisher
MDPI AG
Published
2020-02-05
Volume
9
Issue
2
Pages
195
ISSN
2223-7747 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3004656553
Cited by
74
References
81
Citations by year
2026: 12 · 2025: 18 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 15 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 1
FWCI
5.33
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Plants (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
European Regional Development Fund (CZ.02.1.01/0.0/0.0/16_019/0000738)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Plant Genetic and Mutation Studies
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Phytase and its Applications
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Plant Stress Responses and Tolerance
Keywords
barley, phytic acid, phosphate storage, salt tolerance, abiotic stress signaling, CRISPR/Cas9 mutagenesis, allelic variants

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review