The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A Review on Reverse Osmosis and Nanofiltration Membranes for Water Purification
Open accessAbstract
Sustainable and affordable supply of clean, safe, and adequate water is one of the most challenging issues facing the world. Membrane separation technology is one of the most cost-effective and widely applied technologies for water purification. Polymeric membranes such as cellulose-based (CA) membranes and thin-film composite (TFC) membranes have dominated the industry since 1980. Although further development of polymeric membranes for better performance is laborious, the research findings and sustained progress in inorganic membrane development have grown fast and solve some remaining problems. In addition to conventional ceramic metal oxide membranes, membranes prepared by graphene oxide (GO), carbon nanotubes (CNTs), and mixed matrix materials (MMMs) have attracted enormous attention due to their desirable properties such as tunable pore structure, excellent chemical, mechanical, and thermal tolerance, good salt rejection and/or high water permeability. This review provides insight into synthesis approaches and structural properties of recent reverse osmosis (RO) and nanofiltration (NF) membranes which are used to retain dissolved species such as heavy metals, electrolytes, and inorganic salts in various aqueous solutions. A specific focus has been placed on introducing and comparing water purification performance of different classes of polymeric and ceramic membranes in related water treatment industries. Furthermore, the development challenges and research opportunities of organic and inorganic membranes are discussed and the further perspectives are analyzed.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
New insights into the surface properties of hard-templated ordered mesoporous carbons
Li, X., Forouzandeh, F., Fürstenhaupt, T., Banham, D., Feng, F., Ye, S., Kwok, D. Y., & Birss, V. (2018) · Carbon · doi:10.1016/j.carbon.2017.11.049 · Cited by 39
Cited by
Osman, A. I., Chen, Z., Elgarahy, A. M., Farghali, M., Mohamed, I. M. A., Priya, A. K., Hawash, H. B., & Yap, P. (2024) · Advanced Energy and Sustainability Research · doi:10.1002/aesr.202400011 · Cited by 365
Disinfection by-products in drinking water: Occurrence, toxicity and abatement
Srivastav, A. L., Patel, N., & Chaudhary, V. K. (2020) · Environmental Pollution · doi:10.1016/j.envpol.2020.115474 · Cited by 342
Shehata, N., Egirani, D., Olabi, A. G., Inayat, A., Abdelkareem, M. A., Chae, K.-J., & Sayed, E. T. (2023) · Chemosphere · doi:10.1016/j.chemosphere.2023.137993 · Cited by 253
Ahmad, N. N. R., Ang, W. L., Teow, Y. H., Mohammad, A. W., & Hilal, N. (2022) · Journal of Water Process Engineering · doi:10.1016/j.jwpe.2021.102478 · Cited by 188
Metadata
- Authors
- Yang, Z., Zhou, Y., Feng, Z., Rui, X., Zhang, T., & Zhang, Z.
- Venue
- Polymers
- Publisher
- MDPI AG
- Published
- 2019-07-29
- Volume
- 11
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 1252
- ISSN
- 2073-4360 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2965389711
- Cited by
- 606
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 20.69
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A Review on Reverse Osmosis and Nanofiltration Membranes for Water Purification. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.3390/polym11081252
- The paper
- Yang, Z., Zhou, Y., Feng, Z., Rui, X., Zhang, T., & Zhang, Z. (2019). A Review on Reverse Osmosis and Nanofiltration Membranes for Water Purification. Polymers. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym11081252
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.