Cited by 192Collagen: Extraction and CharacterizationNanocomposite Films for Food PackagingSilk-based biomaterials and applications

Collagen Derived from Fish Industry Waste: Progresses and Challenges

Open access
Rajabimashhadi, Zahra, Gallo, Nunzia, Salvatore, Luca, Lionetto, Francesca·2023·Polymers

Abstract

Fish collagen garnered significant academic and commercial focus in the last decades featuring prospective applications in a variety of health-related industries, including food, medicine, pharmaceutics, and cosmetics. Due to its distinct advantages over mammalian-based collagen, including the reduced zoonosis transmission risk, the absence of cultural-religious limitations, the cost-effectiveness of manufacturing process, and its superior bioavailability, the use of collagen derived from fish wastes (i.e., skin, scales) quickly expanded. Moreover, by-products are low cost and the need to minimize fish industry waste’s environmental impact paved the way for the use of discards in the development of collagen-based products with remarkable added value. This review summarizes the recent advances in the valorization of fish industry wastes for the extraction of collagen used in several applications. Issues related to processing and characterization of collagen were presented. Moreover, an overview of the most relevant applications in food industry, nutraceutical, cosmetics, tissue engineering, and food packaging of the last three years was introduced. Lastly, the fish-collagen market and the open technological challenges to a reliable recovery and exploitation of this biopolymer were discussed.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3390/polym15030544

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Fish collagen shows many advantages over mammalian-based collagen, including reduced zoonosis transmission risk, reduced cultural-religious limitations, cost-effectiveness of manufacturing, and high bioavailability.

    “Application of fish collagen reduces zoonosis transmission risk and cultural-religious limitations, but also brings the cost-effectiveness of manufacturing process and high bioavailability.”

    From Use of Waste from the Food Industry and Applications of the Fermentation Process to Create Sustainable Cosmetic Products: A Review (2024) · cites this paper as [107]

    Section 3 (Fish Collagen; page unavailable) supports lower disease-transmission risk than mammalian collagen and fewer religious or cultural limitations. Section 5 (Collagen Applications; page unavailable) describes affordability and ease of absorption, but Section 6 (Collagen Market; page unavailable) says marine collagen extraction is cost-intensive and bovine collagen has a cost advantage. The claimed manufacturing cost advantage over mammalian collagen is therefore not supported. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Fish wastes (skin, scales) are a cheap and environmentally friendly source of collagen.

    “Recently, the attention of researchers has focused primarily on the use of fish wastes (i.e., skin, scales) as a cheap and environmentally friendly source of collagen [107].”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 223 · Cited by 192

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [72]Sharma S. Dwivedi S. Chandra S. Srivastava A. Vijay P. Collagen: A Brief Analysis Oral. Maxillofac. Pathol. J. 2019 10 11 17 10.5005/jp-journals-10037-1143 · DOI

Authors
Rajabimashhadi, Z., Gallo, N., Salvatore, L., & Lionetto, F.
Affiliations
  • University of Salento (IT)
  • Typeone Srl, Muro Leccese (LE), 73100 Lecce, Italy
Corresponding author
Lionetto, Francesca
Venue
Polymers
Publisher
MDPI AG
Published
2023-01-20
Volume
15
Issue
3
Pages
544
ISSN
2073-4360 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4317739097
Cited by
192
References
223
Citations by year
2026: 50 · 2025: 59 · 2024: 60 · 2023: 23
FWCI
3.38
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Polymers (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • AIRUS (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
Funders
POC PUGLIA FESR-FSE 2014/2020 RIPARTI project (284e667a)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Biomaterials › Collagen: Extraction and Characterization
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Biomaterials › Nanocomposite Films for Food Packaging
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Biomaterials › Silk-based biomaterials and applications
Keywords
fish collagen, fish skin, fish scales, collagen extraction, waste valorization, nutraceuticals, cosmetics, tissue engineering, edible packaging, zoonotic risk

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review