Cited by 18Fiber-reinforced polymer compositesPolymer crystallization and propertiesNatural Fiber Reinforced Composites

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Characterization of Hybrid FRP Composite Produced from Recycled PET and CFRP

Open access

Abstract

In recent years, carbon fiber has experienced a significant surge in popularity attributed to its exceptional properties, including its high-temperature resistance, mechanical strength, and cost-effectiveness. Many industries have been attracted to the prevalent use of carbon-fiber-reinforced polymers or plastics (CFRP). However, the increasing demand for carbon fiber has created a waste recycling problem that needs to be addressed. This research aimed to develop a recycled composite using PET waste as a solution to the growing demand for both materials. The recycled carbon fibers were processed chemically and mechanically to generate power for this process. Various samples were tested with different proportions of CF (10%, 20%, 30%, and 40%) to analyze their mechanical properties. The recycled composites are examined under tensile test conditions to further explore the waste carbon reinforcement’s effect on polymers’ characteristics. Scanning electron microscopy was also utilized for mechanical morphology evaluations. After analyzing the data, it was found that samples containing 20% CF had the highest elastic modulus value among all the mixes. This is attributed to the reinforcing effect of the fibers. The Elasticity Modulus of the filaments increased with the concentration of CF, reaching its peak at 20% before decreasing. This trend is also apparent in the visual representations. When compared to recycling, the Elasticity Modulus value of 20% CF filament increased by 97.5%. The precise value for CF with a 20% filament is 4719.3 MPa. Moreover, the composite samples were analyzed using SEM to characterize them, and it was discovered that the incorporation of 20% CF/PET filler produced the composition with the highest strength.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3390/polym15132946

Cites

Statistics

Figures

Figure 1 Schematic Diagram of pyrolysis process; (a) sample before pyrolysis machine (b) Pyrolysis machine (c) Sample after pyrolysis process.
Figure 1 Schematic Diagram of pyrolysis process; (a) sample before pyrolysis machine (b) Pyrolysis machine (c) Sample after pyrolysis process.CC BY · PubMed Central
Figure 2 (a) Grinder mill machine and (b) Planetary Ball Mill PM 100.
Figure 2 (a) Grinder mill machine and (b) Planetary Ball Mill PM 100.CC BY · PubMed Central
Figure 3 Material samples of (a) CF, (b) PET, (c) twin-screw extruder, and (d) prepared sample.
Figure 3 Material samples of (a) CF, (b) PET, (c) twin-screw extruder, and (d) prepared sample.CC BY · PubMed Central
Figure 4 Sample Preparation (a) Bonding phase of the sample to make shoulders, (b) Finalized five tensile test samples.
Figure 4 Sample Preparation (a) Bonding phase of the sample to make shoulders, (b) Finalized five tensile test samples.CC BY · PubMed Central
Figure 5 Tensile testing machine with a material sample.
Figure 5 Tensile testing machine with a material sample.CC BY · PubMed Central
Figure 6 Stress-Strain curve for three samples of 10% PET composition.
Figure 6 Stress-Strain curve for three samples of 10% PET composition.CC BY · PubMed Central
Figure 7 Graphical representations of different mechanical properties (a–e) at different CF content (%).
Figure 7 Graphical representations of different mechanical properties (a–e) at different CF content (%).CC BY · PubMed Central

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Still being checked.

Research works printed but not linked: 73

  1. Huang, 2009, Fabrication and Properties of Carbon Fibers, Materials, 2, 2369, 10.3390/ma2042369 · DOI
  2. Gholampoor, 2017, Fabrication of nano-Fe 3 O 4 3D structure on carbon fibers as a microwave absorber and EMI shielding composite by modified EPD method, Solid State Sci., 64, 51, 10.1016/j.solidstatesciences.2016.12.005 · DOI
  3. Marshall, 1985, The mechanics of matrix cracking in brittle-matrix fiber composites, Acta Met., 33, 2013, 10.1016/0001-6160(85)90124-5 · DOI
  4. Lu, 2023, Micromechanics-based model of single crack propagation in Engineered cementitious composites (ECC), Constr. Build. Mater., 369, 130519, 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2023.130519 · DOI
  5. Gangineni, 2019, Mechanical behavior of Graphene decorated carbon fiber reinforced polymer composites: An assessment of the influence of functional groups, Compos. Part A Appl. Sci. Manuf., 122, 36, 10.1016/j.compositesa.2019.04.017 · DOI
  6. Wang, 2016, Electrophoretic deposition of graphene oxide on continuous carbon fibers for reinforcement of both tensile and interfacial strength, Compos. Sci. Technol., 135, 46, 10.1016/j.compscitech.2016.07.009 · DOI
  7. Lionetto, F. (2021). Carbon Fiber Reinforced Polymers. Materials, 14. · DOI
  8. Abas, 2018, Natural and synthetic refrigerants, global warming: A review, Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev., 90, 557, 10.1016/j.rser.2018.03.099 · DOI
  9. Shi, 2022, Effect of fiber constituent in matrix on cyclic behavior of PVA-Steel hybrid Fiber-Reinforced cementitious composites columns with mild steel rebar, Constr. Build. Mater., 359, 129514, 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2022.129514 · DOI
  10. Xiaoyong, 2022, Research on mechanical properties of ultra-high performance fiber reinforced cement-based composite after elevated temperature, Compos. Struct., 291, 115584, 10.1016/j.compstruct.2022.115584 · DOI
  11. Singh, 2021, Composite materials based on recycled polyethylene terephthalate and their properties—A comprehensive review, Compos. Part B Eng., 219, 108928, 10.1016/j.compositesb.2021.108928 · DOI
  12. Stănescu, M.M., and Bolcu, D. (2020). A Study of Some Mechanical Properties of Composite Materials with a Dammar-Based Hybrid Matrix and Reinforced by Waste Paper. Polymers, 12. · DOI
  13. Öchsner, A., and Altenbach, H. (2023, May 15). Advanced Structured Materials Engineering Design Applications III Structures, Materials and Processes. Available online: http://www.springer.com/series/8611. · DOI
  14. Dhiman, 2020, Applications and Future Trends of Carbon Fiber Reinforced Polymer Composites: A Review, Int. Res. J. Eng. Technol., 10, 1883
  15. 2021, Investigation of reinforcement corrosion effects in RC columns produced with blast furnace slag and fly ash under reversed-cyclic lateral loading tests, Eng. Struct., 245, 112866, 10.1016/j.engstruct.2021.112866 · DOI
  16. Boucher, 2011, Book Reviews: Book Reviews, Crit. Sociol., 37, 493, 10.1177/0261018311403863 · DOI
  17. Muflikhun, M.A., and Fiedler, B. (2022). Failure Prediction and Surface Characterization of GFRP Laminates: A Study of Stepwise Loading. Polymers, 14. · DOI
  18. Muflikhun, 2023, Systematic analysis of fractured specimens of composite laminates: Different perspectives between tensile, flexural, Mode I, and Mode II test, Int. J. Light Mater. Manuf., 6, 329
  19. Muflikhun, 2020, The evaluation of failure mode behavior of CFRP/Adhesive/SPCC hybrid thin laminates under axial and flexural loading for structural applications, Compos. Part B Eng., 185, 107747, 10.1016/j.compositesb.2020.107747 · DOI
  20. Yu, 2018, Micromechanical modeling of crack-bridging relations of hybrid-fiber Strain-Hardening Cementitious Composites considering interaction between different fibers, Constr. Build. Mater., 182, 629, 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.06.115 · DOI
  21. Deokar, 2016, A Review Paper on Properties of Carbon Fiber Reinforced Polymers, IJRSIT, 2, 238
  22. Worku, 2021, Mechanical Properties of Composite Materials from Waste Poly(ethylene terephthalate) Reinforced with Glass Fibers and Waste Window Glass, Int. J. Polym. Sci., 2021, 226, 10.1155/2021/3320226 · DOI
  23. Zheng, 2022, Recent advances of interphases in carbon fiber-reinforced polymer composites: A review, Compos. Part B Eng., 233, 109639, 10.1016/j.compositesb.2022.109639 · DOI
  24. Ma, 2018, Interfacial enhancement of carbon fiber composites by growing TiO2 nanowires onto amine-based functionalized carbon fiber surface in supercritical water, Appl. Surf. Sci., 433, 560, 10.1016/j.apsusc.2017.10.036 · DOI
  25. Wang, 2016, A controllable interface performance through varying ZnO nanowires dimensions on the carbon fibers, Appl. Surf. Sci., 389, 96, 10.1016/j.apsusc.2016.07.092 · DOI
  26. Yu, 2019, Mechanical performance of Strain-Hardening Cementitious Composites (SHCC) with hybrid polyvinyl alcohol and steel fibers, Compos. Struct., 226, 111198, 10.1016/j.compstruct.2019.111198 · DOI
  27. Chen, 2017, A facile one-pot fabrication of polyphosphazene microsphere/carbon fiber hybrid reinforcement and its effect on the interfacial adhesion of epoxy composites, Appl. Surf. Sci., 410, 530, 10.1016/j.apsusc.2017.03.104 · DOI
  28. Lu, 2018, Highly dispersed graphene oxide electrodeposited carbon fiber reinforced cement-based materials with enhanced mechanical properties, Cem. Concr. Compos., 87, 220, 10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2018.01.006 · DOI
  29. Zhu, 2018, Preparation of polyetherimide nanoparticles on carbon fiber surface via evaporation induced surface modification method and its effect on tensile strength and interfacial shear strength, Appl. Surf. Sci., 454, 54, 10.1016/j.apsusc.2018.04.232 · DOI
  30. Qiu, 2016, Fatigue-induced deterioration of the interface between micro-polyvinyl alcohol (PVA) fiber and cement matrix, Cem. Concr. Res., 90, 127, 10.1016/j.cemconres.2016.08.021 · DOI
  31. Dong, 2017, Improved mechanical properties of carbon fiber-reinforced epoxy composites by growing carbon black on carbon fiber surface, Compos. Sci. Technol., 149, 75, 10.1016/j.compscitech.2017.06.002 · DOI
  32. Kitamura, 2011, The method for surface functionalization of single-walled carbon nanotubes with fuming nitric acid, Carbon, 49, 3851, 10.1016/j.carbon.2011.05.020 · DOI
  33. Chen, 2012, Structural evolution during annealing of thermally reduced graphene nanosheets for application in supercapacitors, Carbon, 50, 3572, 10.1016/j.carbon.2012.03.029 · DOI
  34. Felisberto, 2017, Carbon nanotubes grown on carbon fiber yarns by a low temperature CVD method: A significant enhancement of the interfacial adhesion between carbon fiber/epoxy matrix hierarchical composites, Compos. Commun., 3, 33, 10.1016/j.coco.2017.01.003 · DOI
  35. Pozegic, 2014, Low temperature growth of carbon nanotubes on carbon fibre to create a highly networked fuzzy fibre reinforced composite with superior electrical conductivity, Carbon, 74, 319, 10.1016/j.carbon.2014.03.038 · DOI
  36. Lee, 2016, Electrophoretic deposition of aramid nanofibers on carbon fibers for highly enhanced interfacial adhesion at low content, Compos. Part A Appl. Sci. Manuf., 84, 482, 10.1016/j.compositesa.2016.02.029 · DOI
  37. Malekimoghadam, 2023, Bending analysis of carbon nanotube coated–fiber multi-scale composite beams using the refined zigzag theory, Aerosp. Sci. Technol., 138, 108328, 10.1016/j.ast.2023.108328 · DOI
  38. Cook, 1998, A {3,2}-order bending theory for laminated composite and sandwich beams, Compos. Part B Eng., 29, 565, 10.1016/S1359-8368(98)00011-0 · DOI
  39. Christensen, 1979, Solutions for effective shear properties in three phase sphere and cylinder models, J. Mech. Phys. Solids, 27, 315, 10.1016/0022-5096(79)90032-2 · DOI
  40. Shakhlavi, 2023, On nonlinear damping effects with nonlinear temperature-dependent properties for an axial thermo-viscoelastic rod, Int. J. Non-linear Mech., 153, 104418, 10.1016/j.ijnonlinmec.2023.104418 · DOI
  41. Chauhan, 2022, Enhancing aging resistance of glass fiber/epoxy composites using carbon nanotubes, Mater. Chem. Phys., 291, 104418, 10.1016/j.matchemphys.2022.126740 · DOI
  42. Qu, 2022, Effects of cryo-thermal cycling on interlaminar shear strength and thermal expansion coefficient of carbon fiber/graphene oxide-modified epoxy composites, Compos. Commun., 32, 104418, 10.1016/j.coco.2022.101180 · DOI
  43. Ma, 2010, Dispersion and functionalization of carbon nanotubes for polymer-based nanocomposites: A review, Compos. Part A Appl. Sci. Manuf., 41, 1345, 10.1016/j.compositesa.2010.07.003 · DOI
  44. Barbosa, 2017, Accelerated aging effects on carbon fiber/epoxy composites, Compos. Part B Eng., 110, 298, 10.1016/j.compositesb.2016.11.004 · DOI
  45. Nicholas, 2016, Effects of accelerated environmental aging on glass fiber reinforced thermoset polyurethane composites, Compos. Part B Eng., 94, 370, 10.1016/j.compositesb.2016.03.059 · DOI
  46. Khan, 2018, Augmenting mode-II fracture toughness of carbon fiber/epoxy composites through carbon nanotube grafting, Eng. Fract. Mech., 204, 211, 10.1016/j.engfracmech.2018.10.014 · DOI
  47. Grammatikos, 2012, On the electrical properties of multi scale reinforced composites for damage accumulation monitoring, Compos. Part B Eng., 43, 2687, 10.1016/j.compositesb.2012.01.077 · DOI
  48. Seo, 1999, Damage detection of CFRP laminates using electrical resistance measurement and neural network, Compos. Struct., 47, 525, 10.1016/S0263-8223(00)00016-7 · DOI
  49. Qin, 2021, Mechanical property deterioration and defect repair factors of carbon fibers during the continuous growth of carbon nanotubes by chemical vapor deposition, Ceram. Int., 47, 19213, 10.1016/j.ceramint.2021.03.269 · DOI
  50. Ouyang, 2022, Significantly improving thermal conductivity of carbon fiber polymer composite by weaving highly conductive films, Compos. Part A Appl. Sci. Manuf., 163, 107183, 10.1016/j.compositesa.2022.107183 · DOI
  51. Yadav, 2023, Tailoring of physical properties of glassy selenium (g-Se) by using multi-walled carbon nanotubes (MWCNTs), Mater. Sci. Eng. B, 290, 116310, 10.1016/j.mseb.2023.116310 · DOI
  52. Wang, 2014, Heterogeneously structured conductive carbon fiber composites by using multi-scale silver particles, Compos. Part B Eng., 61, 172, 10.1016/j.compositesb.2014.01.049 · DOI
  53. Suzuki, 1999, Pitch-based carbon fiber microstructure and texture and compatibility with aluminum coated using chemical vapor deposition, Carbon, 37, 47, 10.1016/S0008-6223(98)00186-9 · DOI
  54. Yang, 2013, Effect of tungsten addition on thermal conductivity of graphite/copper composites, Compos. Part B Eng., 55, 1, 10.1016/j.compositesb.2013.05.023 · DOI
  55. Lee, 2007, Effect of alloying elements on the interfacial bonding strength and electric conductivity of carbon nano-fiber reinforced Cu matrix composites, Mater. Sci. Eng. A, 449-451, 778, 10.1016/j.msea.2006.02.377 · DOI
  56. Xia, 2009, Effect of carbide formers on microstructure and thermal conductivity of diamond-Cu composites for heat sink materials, Trans. Nonferrous Met. Soc. China, 19, 1161, 10.1016/S1003-6326(08)60422-7 · DOI
  57. Nepal, 2023, High tilted antiferroelectric liquid crystals: Polymer-based approach for phase stabilisation and device development, J. Mol. Liq., 375, 121297, 10.1016/j.molliq.2023.121297 · DOI
  58. Yildizel, 2020, Experimental and modelling study of mixture design optimisation of glass fibre-reinforced concrete with combined utilisation of Taguchi and Extreme Vertices Design Techniques, J. Mater. Res. Technol., 9, 2093, 10.1016/j.jmrt.2020.02.083 · DOI
  59. Chua, 2015, Probabilistic predictive modelling of carbon nanocomposites for medical implants design, J. Mech. Behav. Biomed. Mater., 44, 164, 10.1016/j.jmbbm.2015.01.013 · DOI
  60. Barter, 2020, A systems engineering vision for floating offshore wind cost optimization, Renew. Energy Focus, 34, 1, 10.1016/j.ref.2020.03.002 · DOI
  61. Zhang, 2023, Experimental and numerical research on opening size effect of novel short fiber reinforced composite laminates, Results Phys., 46, 106303, 10.1016/j.rinp.2023.106303 · DOI
  62. Ouyang, 2022, Research advances in the mechanical joining process for fiber reinforced plastic composites, Compos. Struct., 296, 115906, 10.1016/j.compstruct.2022.115906 · DOI
  63. Um, 2021, Effect of crystallinity on the mechanical behavior of carbon fiber reinforced polyethylene-terephthalate (CF/PET) composites considering temperature conditions, Compos. Sci. Technol., 207, 108745, 10.1016/j.compscitech.2021.108745 · DOI
  64. Sadeghi, 2021, Recent Studies on Recycled PET Fibers: Production and Applications: A Review, Mater. Circ. Econ., 3, 4, 10.1007/s42824-020-00014-y · DOI
  65. Kirshanov, K., Toms, R., Aliev, G., Naumova, A., Melnikov, P., and Gervald, A. (2022). Recent Developments and Perspectives of Recycled Poly(ethylene terephthalate)-Based Membranes: A Review. Membranes, 12. · DOI
  66. Zhou, 2022, Research on laser ultrasonic propagation characteristics and quantitative detection of delamination of carbon fiber composite, Optik, 271, 170173, 10.1016/j.ijleo.2022.170173 · DOI
  67. Wu, J., Gao, X., Wu, Y., Wang, Y., Nguyen, T.T., and Guo, M. (2023). Recycling Carbon Fiber from Carbon Fiber-Reinforced Polymer and Its Reuse in Photocatalysis: A Review. Polymers, 15. · DOI
  68. Olam, M. (2023). Mechanical and Thermal Properties of HDPE/PET Microplastics, Applications, and Impact on Environment and Life, IntechOpen. · DOI
  69. Zhang, 2014, Effects of humidity conditions at fabrication on the interfacial shear strength of flax/unsaturated polyester composites, Compos. Part B Eng., 60, 186, 10.1016/j.compositesb.2013.12.031 · DOI
  70. Liu, 2022, Research on mechanical properties and durability of flax/glass fiber bio-hybrid FRP composites laminates, Compos. Struct., 290, 115566, 10.1016/j.compstruct.2022.115566 · DOI
  71. Xie, 2021, Research on basalt fiber reinforced phosphogypsum-based composites based on single factor test and RSM test, Constr. Build. Mater., 316, 126084, 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2021.126084 · DOI
  72. Qing, 2023, Research progress on aligned fiber reinforced cement-based composites, Constr. Build. Mater., 363, 129578, 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2022.129578 · DOI
  73. Joy, 1997, Scanning electron microscopy for materials characterization, Curr. Opin. Solid State Mater. Sci., 2, 465, 10.1016/S1359-0286(97)80091-5 · DOI

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
Almahri, G., Madi, K., Alkaabi, F., Badran, Y., Shehadeh, K., ElHassan, A., Ahmed, W., & Alzahmi, S.
Affiliations
United Arab Emirates University (AE)
Corresponding author
Alzahmi, Salem
Venue
Polymers
Publisher
MDPI AG
Published
2023-07-04
Volume
15
Issue
13
Pages
2946
ISSN
2073-4360 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4383226927
Cited by
18
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 2
FWCI
1.77
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Polymers (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
Funders
UAE University (31R333)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Mechanical Engineering › Fiber-reinforced polymer composites
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Polymers and Plastics › Polymer crystallization and properties
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Polymers and Plastics › Natural Fiber Reinforced Composites
Keywords
recycled carbon fiber, carbon fiber reinforced polymer, PET waste, recycled PET, carbon fiber recycling, mechanical properties, tensile properties, elastic modulus, fiber content, composite morphology

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review