Cited by 1Powder Metallurgy Techniques and MaterialsHeat and Mass Transfer in Porous MediaInjection Molding Process and Properties

Numerical Simulation and Experimental Study of the Thermal Wick-Debinding Used in Low-Pressure Powder Injection Molding

Open access
Turki, Mohamed Amine, Delbergue, Dorian, Marcil-St-Onge, Gabriel, Demers, Vincent·2025·Powders

Abstract

Thermal wick-debinding, commonly used in low-pressure injection molding, remains challenging due to complex interactions between binder transport, capillary forces, and thermal effects. This study presents a numerical simulation of binder removal kinetics by coupling Darcy’s law with the Phase Transport in Porous Media interface in COMSOL Multiphysics. The model was validated and subsequently used to study the influence of key debinding parameters. Contrary to the Level Set method, which predicts isolated binder clusters, the Multiphase Flow in Porous Media method proposed in this work more accurately reflects the physical behavior of the process, capturing a continuous binder extraction throughout the green part and a uniform binder distribution within the wicking medium. The model successfully predicted the experimentally observed decrease in binder saturation with increasing debinding temperature or time, with deviation limited 3–10 vol. % (attributed to a mandatory brushing operation, which may underestimate the residual binder mass). The model was then used to optimize the debinding process: for a temperature of 100 °C and an inter-part gap distance of 5 mm, the debinding time was minimized to 7 h. These findings highlight the model’s practical utility for process design, offering a valuable tool for determining optimal debinding parameters and improving productivity.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3390/powders4030022

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 38 · Cited by 1

Authors
Turki, M. A., Delbergue, D., Marcil-St-Onge, G., & Demers, V.
Affiliations
École de Technologie Supérieure (CA)
Corresponding author
Demers, Vincent
Venue
Powders
Publisher
MDPI AG
Published
2025-08-01
Volume
4
Issue
3
Pages
22
ISSN
2674-0516 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4412819935
Cited by
1
References
38
Citations by year
2026: 1
FWCI
0.29
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Powders (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Espace ÉTS (ETS) (submittedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
Mitacs Globalink Graduate Fellowship and Natural Science and Engineering Research Council (RDCPJ 531851—18)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Mechanical Engineering › Powder Metallurgy Techniques and Materials
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Computational Mechanics › Heat and Mass Transfer in Porous Media
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Mechanical Engineering › Injection Molding Process and Properties
Keywords
capillary forces, Darcy's law, multiphase flow in porous media, green parts

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review