Real-Time 3D Printing Remote Defect Detection (Stringing) with Computer Vision and Artificial Intelligence
Open accessAbstract
This work describes a novel methodology for the quality assessment of a Fused Filament Fabrication (FFF) 3D printing object during the printing process through AI-based Computer Vision. Specifically, Neural Networks are developed for identifying 3D printing defects during the printing process by analyzing video captured from the process. Defects are likely to occur in 3D printed objects during the printing process, with one of them being stringing; they are mostly correlated to one of the printing parameters or the object’s geometries. The defect stringing can be on a large scale and is usually located in visible parts of the object by a capturing camera. In this case, an AI model (Deep Convolutional Neural Network) was trained on images where the stringing issue is clearly displayed and deployed in a live environment to make detections and predictions on a video camera feed. In this work, we present a methodology for developing and deploying deep neural networks for the recognition of stringing. The trained model can be successfully deployed (with appropriate assembly of required hardware such as microprocessors and a camera) on a live environment. Stringing can be then recognized in line with fast speed and classification accuracy. Furthermore, this approach can be further developed in order to make adjustments to the printing process. Via this, the proposed approach can either terminate the printing process or correct parameters which are related to the identified defect.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Real-time monitoring systems equipped with AI can detect and correct deviations from desired printing conditions, ensuring high precision and repeatability.
“Real-time monitoring systems equipped with AI can detect and correct deviations from desired printing conditions, ensuring high precision and repeatability in the production of 3D-printed foods [150].”
From Towards the development of foods 3D printer: Trends and technologies for foods printing (2024) · cites this paper as [150]
Cites
FCOS: Fully Convolutional One-Stage Object Detection
Tian, Z., Shen, C., Chen, H., & He, T. (2019) · 2019 IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV) · doi:10.1109/iccv.2019.00972 · Cited by 7,013 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Towards the development of foods 3D printer: Trends and technologies for foods printing
Neamah, H. A., & Tandio, J. (2024) · Heliyon · doi:10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e33882 · Cited by 43 · see citing works
“Real-time monitoring and rapid detection of contaminants using advanced sensors and AI technology are crucial [151].”
BackgroundMethod
- Authors
- Paraskevoudis, K., Karayannis, P., & Koumoulos, E. P.
- Affiliations
- IRES—Innovation in Research & Engineering Solutions, Rue Koningin Astritlaan 59B, 1780 Wemmel, Belgium
- Corresponding author
- Koumoulos, Elias P.
- ORCID
- Koumoulos, Elias P.
- Venue
- Processes
- Publisher
- MDPI AG
- Published
- 2020-11-16
- Volume
- 8
- Issue
- 11
- Pages
- 1464
- ISSN
- 2227-9717 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W3102456404
- Cited by
- 189
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 30 · 2025: 43 · 2024: 48 · 2023: 31 · 2022: 22 · 2021: 15
- FWCI
- 10.84
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Processes (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering › Industrial Vision Systems and Defect Detection
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Automotive Engineering › Additive Manufacturing and 3D Printing Technologies
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Advanced Neural Network Applications
- Keywords
- stringing, fused deposition modeling, real-time monitoring, computer vision, deep convolutional neural networks, video inspection, quality assessment
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review