Cited by 189Industrial Vision Systems and Defect DetectionAdditive Manufacturing and 3D Printing TechnologiesAdvanced Neural Network Applications

Real-Time 3D Printing Remote Defect Detection (Stringing) with Computer Vision and Artificial Intelligence

Open access
Paraskevoudis, Konstantinos, Karayannis, Panagiotis, Koumoulos, Elias P.·2020·Processes

Abstract

This work describes a novel methodology for the quality assessment of a Fused Filament Fabrication (FFF) 3D printing object during the printing process through AI-based Computer Vision. Specifically, Neural Networks are developed for identifying 3D printing defects during the printing process by analyzing video captured from the process. Defects are likely to occur in 3D printed objects during the printing process, with one of them being stringing; they are mostly correlated to one of the printing parameters or the object’s geometries. The defect stringing can be on a large scale and is usually located in visible parts of the object by a capturing camera. In this case, an AI model (Deep Convolutional Neural Network) was trained on images where the stringing issue is clearly displayed and deployed in a live environment to make detections and predictions on a video camera feed. In this work, we present a methodology for developing and deploying deep neural networks for the recognition of stringing. The trained model can be successfully deployed (with appropriate assembly of required hardware such as microprocessors and a camera) on a live environment. Stringing can be then recognized in line with fast speed and classification accuracy. Furthermore, this approach can be further developed in order to make adjustments to the printing process. Via this, the proposed approach can either terminate the printing process or correct parameters which are related to the identified defect.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3390/pr8111464

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Real-time monitoring systems equipped with AI can detect and correct deviations from desired printing conditions, ensuring high precision and repeatability.

    “Real-time monitoring systems equipped with AI can detect and correct deviations from desired printing conditions, ensuring high precision and repeatability in the production of 3D-printed foods [150].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Paraskevoudis, K., Karayannis, P., & Koumoulos, E. P.
Affiliations
IRES—Innovation in Research & Engineering Solutions, Rue Koningin Astritlaan 59B, 1780 Wemmel, Belgium
Corresponding author
Koumoulos, Elias P.
Venue
Processes
Publisher
MDPI AG
Published
2020-11-16
Volume
8
Issue
11
Pages
1464
ISSN
2227-9717 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3102456404
Cited by
189
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 30 · 2025: 43 · 2024: 48 · 2023: 31 · 2022: 22 · 2021: 15
FWCI
10.84
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
Processes (publishedVersion, cc-by)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering › Industrial Vision Systems and Defect Detection
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Automotive Engineering › Additive Manufacturing and 3D Printing Technologies
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Advanced Neural Network Applications
Keywords
stringing, fused deposition modeling, real-time monitoring, computer vision, deep convolutional neural networks, video inspection, quality assessment

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review