Cited by 2Religion, Spirituality, and PsychologyContemporary Christian Leadership and EducationEgo Development and Educational Practices

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 18 of the 19 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

A New Lens for Seeing: A Suggestion for Analyzing Religious Belief and Belonging among Emerging Adults through a Constructive-Developmental Lens

Open access

Abstract

In recent years, there has been an explosion of research on the religious lives of adolescents and emerging adults. Methodologies vary from large-scale quantitative surveys to smaller qualitative interview protocols. Findings point to a significant drop in religious affiliation among emerging adults. Making good sense of the findings can be difficult for ministers and educators who serve across these populations. In this article, we suggest using a constructive-developmental lens to read qualitative findings. We offer a framework to guide researchers in interpreting the narratives of research subjects, noting how they make sense of religious belief and belonging.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3390/rel11110573

Cites

18 of 18 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 19 references

Research works printed but not linked: 4

  1. Bronfenbrenner, Uri (2005). Making Human Beings Human: Bioecological Perspectives on Human Development, Sage Publications.
  2. MacIntyre, Alasdair (1984). After Virtue: A Study in Moral Theory, University of Notre Dame Press.
  3. McCarty, Robert, and Vitek, John (2018). Going, Going, Gone: The Dynamics of Disaffiliation in Young Catholic, St. Mary’s Press.
  4. Taylor, Charles (1989). Sources of the Self: The Making of the Modern Identity, Harvard University Press.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 2

Metadata

Authors
O’Keefe, T. A., & Jendzejec, E.
Affiliations
Boston College (US)
Corresponding author
  • O’Keefe, Theresa A.
  • Jendzejec, Emily
Venue
Religions
Publisher
MDPI AG
Published
2020-11-02
Volume
11
Issue
11
Pages
573
ISSN
2077-1444 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3096449073
Cited by
2
References
19
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 1
FWCI
0.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Religions (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Health › Religion, Spirituality, and Psychology
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Religious studies › Contemporary Christian Leadership and Education
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Ego Development and Educational Practices
Keywords
emerging adults, religious beliefs, religious belonging, constructive-developmental theory, qualitative interpretation, narrative analysis, religious development

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A New Lens for Seeing: A Suggestion for Analyzing Religious Belief and Belonging among Emerging Adults through a Constructive-Developmental Lens. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.3390/rel11110573
The paper
O’Keefe, T. A., & Jendzejec, E. (2020). A New Lens for Seeing: A Suggestion for Analyzing Religious Belief and Belonging among Emerging Adults through a Constructive-Developmental Lens. Religions. https://doi.org/10.3390/rel11110573