The DOI matches its Crossref record; 15 of the 16 references it cites were found in a registry or an index, and 1 are not checked yet.
Revisiting the “Secret Consort” (gsang yum) in Tibetan Buddhism
Open accessAbstract
This article revisits the question, first introduced by feminist scholars in the mid-1990s, about whether sexual practices within Buddhist tantra (heterosexually conceived) are empowering or exploitative to women. The purpose here is to complicate this question, given the different geographic settings and cultural contexts in which consort relationships have been embedded—from eastern Tibet to North America—and to nuance our understanding of the potential and pitfalls of sexuality in tantric contexts. To do so, I query the dynamics of secrecy and sexuality in tantric practice, examining twentieth century examples of female practitioners of Tibetan Buddhism who have participated in such relationships and thereby highlighting the localized ways that the “secret consort” (gsang yum) has been invoked as a social role. This issue is especially relevant today in light of the global #MeToo movement and recent disclosures of sexual improprieties and alleged abuse involving Tibetan teachers at the head of Buddhist communities in Europe and North America. For this reason, to conclude, I discuss shifting perspectives on sexuality as Buddhist tantra has spread beyond Asia and draw attention to current voices calling for greater transparency and community accountability.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“In the Treasure tradition, visionaries engage in sexual practices that are understood to aid them in their revelations. These practices may be done through the imagination or by actual engagement with a female partner called a secret consort (gsang yum) (Gayley 2018).”
From Feeling the Way to Revelation: Patterns of Doubt and Persuasion in Tibetan Buddhist Auto/biographical Treasure Narratives (2021) · cites this paper as Gayley 2018
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Faure, B. (1998) · doi:10.1515/9781400822607 · Cited by 179
Kiss of the Yogini: "Tantric Sex" in its South Asian Contexts
White, D. G. (2003) · doi:10.7208/chicago/9780226027838.001.0001 · Cited by 153
Gyatso, J. (1998) · Princeton University Press eBooks · doi:10.1515/9780691221427 · Cited by 93
Shaw, M. (1994) · Princeton University Press eBooks · doi:10.1515/9781400843367 · Cited by 90
Tantra: Sex, Secrecy, Politics, and Power in the Study of Religion
Urban, H. B. (2003) · doi:10.1525/9780520936898 · Cited by 79
The Oxford Handbook of Buddhist Ethics
Cozort, D., & Shields, J. M. (2018) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oxfordhb/9780198746140.001.0001 · Cited by 78
Gayley, H. (2016) · Columbia University Press eBooks · doi:10.7312/columbia/9780231180528.001.0001 · Cited by 23
Self-citationDiValerio, D. M. (2015) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199391202.001.0001 · Cited by 17
Love and Liberation: Autobiographical Writings of the Tibetan Buddhist Visionary Sera Khandro
Jacoby, S. (2014) · doi:10.7312/columbia/9780231147682.001.0001 · Cited by 16
(2014) · State University of New York Press eBooks · doi:10.1515/9781438451329 · Cited by 13
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 15
- Chenagtsang, Nida (2018). Karmamudra: The Yoga of Bliss (Sexuality in Tibetan Medicine and Buddhism), Sky Press.
- Cuevas, Bryan (2008). Travels in the Netherworld: Buddhist Popular Narratives of Death and the Afterlife in Tibet, Oxford University Press.
- Dalton, Jacob (2011). The Taming of Demons: Violence and Liberation in Tibetan Buddhism, Yale University Press.
- Davidson, Ronald (2002). Indian Esoteric Buddhism, Columbia University Press.
- Davidson, Ronald (2005). Tibetan Renaissance: Tantric Buddhism in the Rebirth of Tibetan Culture, Columbia University Press.
- Gayley, Holly Inseparable Across Lifetimes: The Lives and Letters of the Tibetan Visionaries Namtrul Rinpoche and Khandro Tāre Lhamo, Shambhala Publications. Forthcoming.
- Gyatso, 2006, A Partial Genealogy of the Lifestory of Ye shes mtsho rgyal, Journal of the International Association of Tibetan Studies, 2, 1
- Lopez, Donald (1998). Prisoners of Shangri-la: Tibetan Buddhism and the West, The University of Chicago Press.
- Nattier, Jan (1991). Once Upon a Future Time: Studies in a Buddhist Prophecy of Decline, University of California Press.
- Orsi, Robert (2016). History and Presence, The Belknap Press of Harvard University.
- Rossi, 2008, Mkha’ ‘gro dbang mo’i rnam thar, The Biography of the Gter ston ma Bde chen chos kyi dbang mo (1868–1927?), Revue d’Etudes Tibétaines, 15, 371
- Scott, James (1992). Domination and the Arts of Resistance: Hidden Transcripts, Yale University Press.
- Siegel, Lee (1978). Sacred and Profane Dimensions of Love in Indian Traditions as Exemplified by the Gītagovinda of Jayadeva, Oxford University Press.
- Cozort, Daniel, and Shields, James Mark (2018). Tantric Ethics. The Oxford Handbook of Buddhist Ethics, Oxford University Press. · DOI
- Wedemeyer, Christian K. (2013). Making Sense of Tantric Buddhism: History, Semiology, & Transgression in the Indian Traditions, Columbia University Press.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
An Imperfect Alliance: Feminism and Contemporary Female Buddhist Monasticisms
Langenberg, A. P. (2018) · Religions · doi:10.3390/rel9060190 · Cited by 14
Feeling Apart: Relations of Belonging in Tibetan Buddhist Lay-Monastic Communities
Caple, J. (2021) · Numen · doi:10.1163/15685276-12341636 · Cited by 9
Langenberg, A. P. (2017) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/obo/9780195393521-0244 · Cited by 5
Townsend, D. (2021) · Numen · doi:10.1163/15685276-12341638 · Cited by 3
Metadata
- Authors
- Gayley, H.
- Affiliations
- University of Colorado Boulder (US)
- Corresponding author
- Gayley, Holly
- Venue
- Religions
- Publisher
- MDPI AG
- Published
- 2018-06-01
- Volume
- 9
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 179
- ISSN
- 2077-1444 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2807088919
- Cited by
- 12
- References
- 15
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 1 · 2018: 1
- FWCI
- 14.70
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- dx.doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Religions (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- CU Scholar (University of Colorado Boulder) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Religious studies › Indian and Buddhist Studies
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Religious studies › Religious Studies and Spiritual Practices
- Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Gender and Feminist Studies
- Keywords
- Tibetan Buddhism, Buddhist Tantra, secrecy, #MeToo, sexual abuse allegations, teacher misconduct, transparency and accountability
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review