The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Leveraging the Google Earth Engine for Drought Assessment Using Global Soil Moisture Data
Open accessAbstract
Soil moisture is considered to be a key variable to assess crop and drought conditions. However, readily available soil moisture datasets developed for monitoring agricultural drought conditions are uncommon. The aim of this work is to examine two global soil moisture datasets and a set of soil moisture web-based processing tools developed to demonstrate the value of the soil moisture data for drought monitoring and crop forecasting using the Google Earth Engine (GEE). The two global soil moisture datasets discussed in the paper are generated by integrating the Soil Moisture Ocean Salinity (SMOS) and Soil Moisture Active Passive (SMAP) missions’ satellite-derived observations into a modified two-layer Palmer model using a one-dimensional (1D) ensemble Kalman filter (EnKF) data assimilation approach. The web-based tools are designed to explore soil moisture variability as a function of land cover change and to easily estimate drought characteristics such as drought duration and intensity using soil moisture anomalies and to intercompare them against alternative drought indicators. To demonstrate the utility of these tools for agricultural drought monitoring, the soil moisture products and vegetation- and precipitation-based products were assessed over drought-prone regions in South Africa and Ethiopia. Overall, the 3-month scale Standardized Precipitation Index (SPI) and Normalized Difference Vegetation Index (NDVI) showed higher agreement with the root zone soil moisture anomalies. Soil moisture anomalies exhibited lower drought duration, but higher intensity compared with SPIs. Inclusion of the global soil moisture data into the GEE data catalog and the development of the web-based tools described in the paper enable a vast diversity of users to quickly and easily assess the impact of drought and improve planning related to drought risk assessment and early warning. The GEE also improves the accessibility and usability of the earth observation data and related tools by making them available to a wide range of researchers and the public. In particular, the cloud-based nature of the GEE is useful for providing access to the soil moisture data and scripts to users in developing countries that lack adequate observational soil moisture data or the necessary computational resources required to develop them.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Global mapping of soil salinity change
Ivushkin, K., Bartholomeus, H., Bregt, A. K., Pulatov, A., Kempen, B., & de Sousa, L. (2019) · Remote Sensing of Environment · doi:10.1016/j.rse.2019.111260 · Cited by 678
Google Earth Engine Applications
Mutanga, O., & Kumar, L. (2019) · Remote Sensing · doi:10.3390/rs11050591 · Cited by 600
West, H., Quinn, N., & Horswell, M. (2019) · Remote Sensing of Environment · doi:10.1016/j.rse.2019.111291 · Cited by 538
Google Earth as a Powerful Tool for Archaeological and Cultural Heritage Applications: A Review
Luo, L., Wang, X., Guo, H., Lasaponara, R., Shi, P., Bachagha, N., Li, L., Yao, Y., Masini, N., Chen, F., et al. (2018) · Remote Sensing · doi:10.3390/rs10101558 · Cited by 112
Metadata
- Authors
- Sazib, N., Mladenova, I., & Bolten, J.
- Venue
- Remote Sensing
- Publisher
- MDPI AG
- Published
- 2018-08-11
- Volume
- 10
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 1265
- ISSN
- 2072-4292 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2885634264
- Cited by
- 161
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 6.78
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Leveraging the Google Earth Engine for Drought Assessment Using Global Soil Moisture Data. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.3390/rs10081265
- The paper
- Sazib, N., Mladenova, I., & Bolten, J. (2018). Leveraging the Google Earth Engine for Drought Assessment Using Global Soil Moisture Data. Remote Sensing. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs10081265
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.