The DOI matches its Crossref record; 84 of the 84 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Land Cover Classification using Google Earth Engine and Random Forest Classifier—The Role of Image Composition
Open accessAbstract
Land cover information plays a vital role in many aspects of life, from scientific and economic to political. Accurate information about land cover affects the accuracy of all subsequent applications, therefore accurate and timely land cover information is in high demand. In land cover classification studies over the past decade, higher accuracies were produced when using time series satellite images than when using single date images. Recently, the availability of the Google Earth Engine (GEE), a cloud-based computing platform, has gained the attention of remote sensing based applications where temporal aggregation methods derived from time series images are widely applied (i.e., the use the metrics such as mean or median), instead of time series images. In GEE, many studies simply select as many images as possible to fill gaps without concerning how different year/season images might affect the classification accuracy. This study aims to analyze the effect of different composition methods, as well as different input images, on the classification results. We use Landsat 8 surface reflectance (L8sr) data with eight different combination strategies to produce and evaluate land cover maps for a study area in Mongolia. We implemented the experiment on the GEE platform with a widely applied algorithm, the Random Forest (RF) classifier. Our results show that all the eight datasets produced moderately to highly accurate land cover maps, with overall accuracy over 84.31%. Among the eight datasets, two time series datasets of summer scenes (images from 1 June to 30 September) produced the highest accuracy (89.80% and 89.70%), followed by the median composite of the same input images (88.74%). The difference between these three classifications was not significant based on the McNemar test (p > 0.05). However, significant difference (p < 0.05) was observed for all other pairs involving one of these three datasets. The results indicate that temporal aggregation (e.g., median) is a promising method, which not only significantly reduces data volume (resulting in an easier and faster analysis) but also produces an equally high accuracy as time series data. The spatial consistency among the classification results was relatively low compared to the general high accuracy, showing that the selection of the dataset used in any classification on GEE is an important and crucial step, because the input images for the composition play an essential role in land cover classification, particularly with snowy, cloudy and expansive areas like Mongolia.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Google Earth Engine: Planetary-scale geospatial analysis for everyone
Gorelick, N., Hancher, M., Dixon, M., Ilyushchenko, S., Thau, D., & Moore, R. (2017) · Remote Sensing of Environment · doi:10.1016/j.rse.2017.06.031 · Cited by 14,719
A large and persistent carbon sink in the world’s forests
Pan, Y., Birdsey, R. A., Fang, J., Houghton, R., Kauppi, P. E., Kurz, W. A., Phillips, O. L., Shvidenko, A., Lewis, S. L., Canadell, J. G., et al. (2011) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1201609 · Cited by 8,458
A soil-adjusted vegetation index (SAVI)
Huete, A. R. (1988) · Remote Sensing of Environment · doi:10.1016/0034-4257(88)90106-x · Cited by 7,948
The use of the Normalized Difference Water Index (NDWI) in the delineation of open water features
McFEETERS, S. K. (1996) · International Journal of Remote Sensing · doi:10.1080/01431169608948714 · Cited by 7,725
NDWI—A normalized difference water index for remote sensing of vegetation liquid water from space
Gao, B.-C. (1996) · Remote Sensing of Environment · doi:10.1016/s0034-4257(96)00067-3 · Cited by 6,951
Monitoring Vegetation Systems in the Great Plains with Erts
Rouse, J. W., Haas, R. H., Schell, J., & Deering, D. W. (1973) · NASA STI Repository (National Aeronautics and Space Administration) · Cited by 6,835
An Introduction to Categorical Data Analysis
Agresti, A. (2007) · Wiley Series in Probability and Statistics · doi:10.1002/0470114754 · Cited by 6,689
Xu, H. (2006) · International Journal of Remote Sensing · doi:10.1080/01431160600589179 · Cited by 5,998
A modified soil adjusted vegetation index
Qi, J., Chehbouni, A., Huete, A. R., Kerr, Y. H., & Sorooshian, S. (1994) · Remote Sensing of Environment · doi:10.1016/0034-4257(94)90134-1 · Cited by 3,379
Use of normalized difference built-up index in automatically mapping urban areas from TM imagery
Zha, Y., Gao, J., & Ni, S. (2003) · International Journal of Remote Sensing · doi:10.1080/01431160304987 · Cited by 2,910
Metadata
- Authors
- Phan, T. N., Kuch, V., & Lehnert, L. W.
- Venue
- Remote Sensing
- Publisher
- MDPI AG
- Published
- 2020-07-27
- Volume
- 12
- Issue
- 15
- Pages
- 2411
- ISSN
- 2072-4292 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W3045585619
- Cited by
- 616
- References
- 84
- FWCI
- 33.46
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Land Cover Classification using Google Earth Engine and Random Forest Classifier—The Role of Image Composition. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.3390/rs12152411
- The paper
- Phan, T. N., Kuch, V., & Lehnert, L. W. (2020). Land Cover Classification using Google Earth Engine and Random Forest Classifier—The Role of Image Composition. Remote Sensing. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs12152411
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.