The DOI matches its Crossref record; 58 of the 58 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Lite-YOLOv5: A Lightweight Deep Learning Detector for On-Board Ship Detection in Large-Scene Sentinel-1 SAR Images
Open accessAbstract
Synthetic aperture radar (SAR) satellites can provide microwave remote sensing images without weather and light constraints, so they are widely applied in the maritime monitoring field. Current SAR ship detection methods based on deep learning (DL) are difficult to deploy on satellites, because these methods usually have complex models and huge calculations. To solve this problem, based on the You Only Look Once version 5 (YOLOv5) algorithm, we propose a lightweight on-board SAR ship detector called Lite-YOLOv5, which (1) reduces the model volume; (2) decreases the floating-point operations (FLOPs); and (3) realizes the on-board ship detection without sacrificing accuracy. First, in order to obtain a lightweight network, we design a lightweight cross stage partial (L-CSP) module to reduce the amount of calculation and we apply network pruning for a more compact detector. Then, in order to ensure the excellent detection performance, we integrate a histogram-based pure backgrounds classification (HPBC) module, a shape distance clustering (SDC) module, a channel and spatial attention (CSA) module, and a hybrid spatial pyramid pooling (H-SPP) module to improve detection performance. To evaluate the on-board SAR ship detection ability of Lite-YOLOv5, we also transplant it to the embedded platform NVIDIA Jetson TX2. Experimental results on the Large-Scale SAR Ship Detection Dataset-v1.0 (LS-SSDD-v1.0) show that Lite-YOLOv5 can realize lightweight architecture with a 2.38 M model volume (14.18% of model size of YOLOv5), on-board ship detection with a low computation cost (26.59% of FLOPs of YOLOv5), and superior detection accuracy (1.51% F1 improvement compared with YOLOv5).
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Enhanced YOLOv5 for detecting workpieces on production lines. Improved mAP on COCO dataset by 2.4% and on custom data by 4.2% using ghost bottleneck lightweight deep convolution.”
From The YOLO Framework: A Comprehensive Review of Evolution, Applications, and Benchmarks in Object Detection (2024) · cites this paper as [128]
Citations
Cites
Faster R-CNN: Towards Real-Time Object Detection with Region Proposal Networks
Ren, S., He, K., Girshick, R., & Sun, J. (2017) · IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence · doi:10.1109/tpami.2016.2577031 · Cited by 73,472
Microsoft COCO: Common Objects in Context
Lin, T.-Y., Maire, M., Belongie, S., Hays, J., Perona, P., Ramanan, D., Dollár, P., & Zitnick, C. L. (2014) · Lecture Notes in Computer Science · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-10602-1_48 · Cited by 45,460
Squeeze-and-Excitation Networks
Hu, J., Shen, L., & Sun, G. (2018) · 2018 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2018.00745 · Cited by 35,667
(2016) · Cited by 31,590
Feature Pyramid Networks for Object Detection
Lin, T.-Y., Dollar, P., Girshick, R., He, K., Hariharan, B., & Belongie, S. (2017) · 2017 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2017.106 · Cited by 30,939
Focal Loss for Dense Object Detection
Lin, T.-Y., Goyal, P., Girshick, R., He, K., & Dollar, P. (2017) · 2017 IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV) · doi:10.1109/iccv.2017.324 · Cited by 30,581
Batch Normalization: Accelerating Deep Network Training by Reducing Internal Covariate Shift
Ioffe, S., & Szegedy, C. (2015) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1502.03167 · Cited by 27,818
CBAM: Convolutional Block Attention Module
Woo, S., Park, J., Lee, J.-Y., & Kweon, I. S. (2018) · Lecture Notes in Computer Science · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-01234-2_1 · Cited by 25,853
SSD: Single Shot MultiBox Detector
Liu, W., Anguelov, D., Erhan, D., Szegedy, C., Reed, S., Fu, C.-Y., & Berg, A. C. (2016) · Lecture Notes in Computer Science · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-46448-0_2 · Cited by 22,128
Path Aggregation Network for Instance Segmentation
Liu, S., Qi, L., Qin, H., Shi, J., & Jia, J. (2018) · 2018 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2018.00913 · Cited by 10,011
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 4
- Mastromichalakis, S. (2020). ALReLU: A different approach on Leaky ReLU activation function to improve Neural Networks Performance. arXiv.
- Gagnon, 1998, R&D activities in airborne SAR image processing/analysis at Lockheed Martin Canada, Proc. SPIE Int. Soc. Opt. Eng., 3491, 998
- Lin, M., Chen, Q., and Yan, S. (2013). Network in Network. arXiv.
- Zhang, X., Wan, F., Liu, C., and Ye, Q. (2019). FreeAnchor: Learning to match anchors for visual object detection. arXiv.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 201–230 of 230
Towards SAR Ship Detection with Semantic Mining and Small Scale Detector
Wang, Y., Liu, J., Wang, X., He, J., Tong, Y., & Ruan, J. (2024) · International Conference on Image Processing, Multimedia Technology and Machine Learning (IPMML) · doi:10.1145/3722405.3722440 · Cited by 1
Polarization-Guided Strategy for Ship Detection in Single-Polarization SAR Images
Guan, J., Yuan, H., Feng, P., He, G., & Jin, S. (2023) · IEEE International Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium (IGARSS) · doi:10.1109/igarss52108.2023.10281419
Investigation of Ionospheric Disturbance in ALOS PALSAR Images Using Machine Learning
Manaswini R, G. R. (2023) · Journal of Propulsion Technology · doi:10.52783/tjjpt.v44.i4.988
A Novel Postprocessing Method for Ship Detection in SAR Images Using Greedy Strategies
Liu, Y., Car, T., Wu, X., Gu, T., Linglong, Z., & Li, Y. (2023) · IEEE Joint International Information Technology and Artificial Intelligence Conference (ITAIC) · doi:10.1109/itaic58329.2023.10408817
Carneiro, G., Xavier, K. C., Sindeaux-Neto, J. L., & SILVA, M. D. (2024) · doi:10.22541/au.172873288.84417088/v1
Cong, P., Xu, Y., Li, T., Li, S., Feng, H., & Zhang, X. (2024) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2024.3485490
Self-citationShip-YOLOv5s: improved YOLOv5 ship target detection based on attention mechanism
Zhang, P., Sun, Z., Dong, J., Zhang, J., & Bai, Y. (2025) · doi:10.1117/12.3045113
A Rotating Target Detection Algorithm for Ships in SAR Images Based on LAOBB-YOLOv8n
Huang, M., Wang, S., Luo, S., Sun, Q., & Zhou, X. (2024) · IEEE International Symposium on Parallel and Distributed Processing with Applications (ISPA) · doi:10.1109/ispa63168.2024.00230
Enhanced Approach to Detect Ship Using Wavelet Transform
Singh, R., Rani, R., Sakshi, S., & Patra, T. K. (2024) · International Conference on System Modeling & Advancement in Research Trends (SMART) · doi:10.1109/smart63812.2024.10882169
Ablation Study of Attention Modules integrated with Deep Learning Networks for Ship Detection
Jo, H., & Kim, B. W. (2024) · Artificial Intelligence and Cloud Computing Conference (AICCC) · doi:10.1145/3719384.3719413
Carneiro, G. S., Xavier, K. C., Sindeaux-Neto, J. L., da Silva, A. D. S. L., & Velasco, M. (2025) · Parasitologia · doi:10.3390/parasitologia5040050
MRKD: Monotonic Relationship-based Knowledge Distillation for SAR Image Recognition
Wang, J., Cheng, Z., Lu, G., Li, K., & Luo, G. (2025) · IEEE International Conference on Multimedia and Expo (ICME) · doi:10.1109/icme59968.2025.11210089
TPU-Enabled SAR Image Processing in Satellites for Maritime Surveillance
Bocek, G., Madabhushi, B., & Kundu, S. K. (2025) · IEEE International Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium (IGARSS) · doi:10.1109/igarss55030.2025.11242353
เครื่องจ่ายยาอัตโนมัติเเละตรวจสอบความถูกต้องด้วยโมเดล YOLOv5
เรืองระวีนุกิจ, ป. (2024) · Journal of Computer and Creative Technology · doi:10.14456/jcct.2024.6
Bulun, S. (2023) · KTH Publication Database DiVA (KTH Royal Institute of Technology)
AEMT-DETR: adaptive enhanced multi-scale tiny DETR for Yangtze River fishing boat detection
Cui, X., & Chen, K. (2026) · Engineering Research Express · doi:10.1088/2631-8695/ae3a40
Lightweight Small Target Detection in SAR Images Based on Improved RT-DETR
Sun, T., Zhang, X., Li, Z., & You, N. (2026) · Lecture notes in electrical engineering · doi:10.1007/978-981-95-3312-1_59
Self-citationESENet: an efficient lightweight network with entropy-guided pooling for SAR ship detection
Cai, Y., Shi, Y., Chen, H., Wang, F., Chen, C., Hu, X., Chang, Y., Qu, C., Yang, X., Wang, L., et al. (2026) · Measurement Science and Technology · doi:10.1088/1361-6501/ae4374
AI-Enabled Clinical Decision Support for Oral Disease Detection
Natarajan, P. (2025) · Tuwhera (Auckland University of Technology)
An Optimized Algorithm for Ship Detection in Load Test Data Mining Based on YOLOv8
Liu, X., Zhang, G., Lin, J., & Zhao, X. (2025) · IEEE International Conference of Safe Production and Informatization (IICSPI) · doi:10.1109/iicspi66775.2025.11437595
GMS-YOLO: A Lightweight Algorithm for SAR Ship Target Detection Based on YOLOv8n
Liu, X., Zhou, X., Li, X., & Xu, J. (2026) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-981-95-8405-5_29
Xie, J., Ye, T., Qin, Y., Gao, Z., & Wang, Y. (2026) · Measurement Science and Technology · doi:10.1088/1361-6501/ae6a00
An Infrared Vessel Detection Model Based on Bidirectional Selective Path Aggregation Network
Lin, Z., Chen, J., & Li, T. (2026) · Communications in computer and information science · doi:10.1007/978-981-95-7087-4_34
PGWave-RotNe: A Novel Lightweight Network for Oriented Object Detection in Remote Sensing
Wang, D., Cao, T., Yang, J., & SongGong, K. (2026) · Remote Sensing · doi:10.3390/rs18111760
Sur, P., Ghosh, A., Hussain, I., Abdar, M., Khosravi, A., Hendy, N., Prete, R. D., Kowalczyk, R., Barton, A., & Banerjee, B. (2026) · IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Magazine · doi:10.1109/mgrs.2026.3689429
CGMSN: CFAR-Guided Mode-Selective Network for SAR Target Detection
Yu, L., Xiong, X., Xie, X., Liang, M., Yu, X., Jiao, X., & Hong, W. (2026) · Remote Sensing · doi:10.3390/rs18122040
Zhou, Z., Yang, Y., & Zhao, D. (2026) · CivilEng · doi:10.3390/civileng7030063
Li, D., Peng, Q., Zhang, K., & Feng, Y. (2026) · Frontiers in Marine Science · doi:10.3389/fmars.2026.1940340
SLA-YOLO: A Lightweight SAR Ship Detection Model
Yin, C., & Bi, N. (2026) · Sensors · doi:10.3390/s26196317
Zhang, L., Ma, Y., Li, G., Li, T., & Yang, W. (2026) · Applied Soft Computing · doi:10.1016/j.asoc.2026.116800
Metadata
- Authors
- Xu, X., Zhang, X., & Zhang, T.
- Affiliations
- University of Electronic Science and Technology of China (CN)
- Corresponding author
- Zhang, Xiaoling
- Venue
- Remote Sensing
- Publisher
- MDPI AG
- Published
- 2022-02-20
- Volume
- 14
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 1018
- ISSN
- 2072-4292 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W4212781487
- Cited by
- 221
- References
- 58
- Citations by year
- 2026: 21 · 2025: 37 · 2024: 67 · 2023: 61 · 2022: 35
- FWCI
- 16.37
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Remote Sensing (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Advanced Neural Network Applications
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Aerospace Engineering › Advanced SAR Imaging Techniques
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Remote-Sensing Image Classification
- Keywords
- SAR ship detection, lightweight object detection, Sentinel-1, maritime surveillance, network pruning, channel and spatial attention, NVIDIA Jetson TX2, embedded deployment
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review