The DOI matches its Crossref record; 12 of the 12 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Recent Advances in Crop Disease Detection Using UAV and Deep Learning Techniques
Open accessAbstract
Because of the recent advances in drones or Unmanned Aerial Vehicle (UAV) platforms, sensors and software, UAVs have gained popularity among precision agriculture researchers and stakeholders for estimating traits such as crop yield and diseases. Early detection of crop disease is essential to prevent possible losses on crop yield and ultimately increasing the benefits. However, accurate estimation of crop disease requires modern data analysis techniques such as machine learning and deep learning. This work aims to review the actual progress in crop disease detection, with an emphasis on machine learning and deep learning techniques using UAV-based remote sensing. First, we present the importance of different sensors and image-processing techniques for improving crop disease estimation with UAV imagery. Second, we propose a taxonomy to accumulate and categorize the existing works on crop disease detection with UAV imagery. Third, we analyze and summarize the performance of various machine learning and deep learning methods for crop disease detection. Finally, we underscore the challenges, opportunities and research directions of UAV-based remote sensing for crop disease detection.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognition
He, K., Zhang, X., Ren, S., & Sun, J. (2016) · 2016 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2016.90 · Cited by 235,474
U-Net: Convolutional Networks for Biomedical Image Segmentation
Ronneberger, O., Fischer, P., & Brox, T. (2015) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-24574-4_28 · Cited by 99,404
LeCun, Y., Bengio, Y., & Hinton, G. (2015) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature14539 · Cited by 84,126
Faster R-CNN: Towards Real-Time Object Detection with Region Proposal Networks
Ren, S., He, K., Girshick, R., & Sun, J. (2017) · IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence · doi:10.1109/tpami.2016.2577031 · Cited by 73,472
Gradient-based learning applied to document recognition
Lecun, Y., Bottou, L., Bengio, Y., & Haffner, P. (1998) · Proceedings of the IEEE · doi:10.1109/5.726791 · Cited by 58,805
Densely Connected Convolutional Networks
Huang, G., Liu, Z., Van Der Maaten, L., & Weinberger, K. Q. (2017) · 2017 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2017.243 · Cited by 48,566
Xception: Deep Learning with Depthwise Separable Convolutions
Chollet, F. (2017) · 2017 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2017.195 · Cited by 20,380
SegNet: A Deep Convolutional Encoder-Decoder Architecture for Image Segmentation
Badrinarayanan, V., Kendall, A., & Cipolla, R. (2017) · IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence · doi:10.1109/tpami.2016.2644615 · Cited by 19,631
The PRISMA 2020 Statement: An Updated Guideline for Reporting Systematic Reviews
Page, M. J., McKenzie, J. E., Bossuyt, P. M., Boutron, I., Hoffmann, T. C., Mulrow, C. D., Shamseer, L., Tetzlaff, J. M., Akl, E. A., Brennan, S. E., et al. (2021) · International Journal of Surgery · doi:10.1016/j.ijsu.2021.105906 · Cited by 11,748
Object Detection With Deep Learning: A Review
Zhao, Z.-Q., Zheng, P., Xu, S.-T., & Wu, X. (2019) · IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks and Learning Systems · doi:10.1109/tnnls.2018.2876865 · Cited by 5,545
A Survey on Semi-, Self- and Unsupervised Learning for Image Classification
Schmarje, L., Santarossa, M., Schroder, S.-M., & Koch, R. (2021) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2021.3084358 · Cited by 246
Stock Price Forecasting with Deep Learning: A Comparative Study
Shahi, T. B., Shrestha, A., Neupane, A., & Guo, W. (2020) · Mathematics · doi:10.3390/math8091441 · Cited by 183
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Shahi, T. B., Xu, C.-Y., Neupane, A., & Guo, W.
- Venue
- Remote Sensing
- Publisher
- MDPI AG
- Published
- 2023-05-06
- Volume
- 15
- Issue
- 9
- Pages
- 2450
- ISSN
- 2072-4292 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W4382630561
- Cited by
- 295
- References
- 12
- FWCI
- 41.38
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
