The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Identification of Rare Wildlife in the Field Environment Based on the Improved YOLOv5 Model
Open accessAbstract
Research on wildlife monitoring methods is a crucial tool for the conservation of rare wildlife in China. However, the fact that rare wildlife monitoring images in field scenes are easily affected by complex scene information, poorly illuminated, obscured, and blurred limits their use. This often results in unstable recognition and low accuracy levels. To address this issue, this paper proposes a novel wildlife identification model for rare animals in Giant Panda National Park (GPNP). We redesigned the C3 module of YOLOv5 using NAMAttention and the MemoryEfficientMish activation function to decrease the weight of field scene features. Additionally, we integrated the WIoU boundary loss function to mitigate the influence of low-quality images during training, resulting in the development of the NMW-YOLOv5 model. Our model achieved 97.3% for mAP50 and 83.3% for mAP50:95 in the LoTE-Animal dataset. When comparing the model with some classical YOLO models for the purpose of conducting comparison experiments, it surpasses the current best-performing model by 1.6% for mAP50:95, showcasing a high level of recognition accuracy. In the generalization ability test, the model has a low error rate for most rare wildlife species and is generally able to identify wildlife in the wild environment of the GPNP with greater accuracy. It has been demonstrated that NMW-YOLOv5 significantly enhances wildlife recognition accuracy in field environments by eliminating irrelevant features and extracting deep, effective features. Furthermore, it exhibits strong detection and recognition capabilities for rare wildlife in GPNP field environments. This could offer a new and effective tool for rare wildlife monitoring in GPNP.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In environmental monitoring, YOLO assists in tracking endangered species and identifying deforestation patterns through satellite imagery.
“In environmental monitoring, YOLOassists in tracking endangered species and identifying deforestation patterns through satellite imagery [45].”
From The YOLO Framework: A Comprehensive Review of Evolution, Applications, and Benchmarks in Object Detection (2024) · cites this paper as [45]
Citations
Cites
Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognition
He, K., Zhang, X., Ren, S., & Sun, J. (2016) · 2016 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2016.90 · Cited by 235,474
ImageNet classification with deep convolutional neural networks
Krizhevsky, A., Sutskever, I., & Hinton, G. E. (2017) · Communications of the ACM · doi:10.1145/3065386 · Cited by 112,155
You Only Look Once: Unified, Real-Time Object Detection
Redmon, J., Divvala, S., Girshick, R., & Farhadi, A. (2016) · 2016 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2016.91 · Cited by 53,803
A Review of Yolo Algorithm Developments
Jiang, P., Ergu, D., Liu, F., Cai, Y., & Ma, B. (2022) · Procedia Computer Science · doi:10.1016/j.procs.2022.01.135 · Cited by 2,783
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 40
- Song, X., Jiang, Y., Zhao, L., Xi, L., Yan, C., and Liao, W. (2023). Predicting the Potential Distribution of the Szechwan Rat Snake (Euprepiophis perlacea) and Its Response to Climate Change in the Yingjing Area of the Giant Panda National Park. Animals, 13. · DOI
- Huang, 2021, Wildlife Conservation and Management in China: Achievements, Challenges and Perspectives, Natl. Sci. Rev., 8, nwab042, 10.1093/nsr/nwab042 · DOI
- 2018, Conservation Technology: The next Generation, Conserv. Lett., 11, e12458, 10.1111/conl.12458 · DOI
- Hill, 2018, AudioMoth: Evaluation of a Smart Open Acoustic Device for Monitoring Biodiversity and the Environment, Methods Ecol. Evol., 9, 1199, 10.1111/2041-210X.12955 · DOI
- Sugai, 2019, Terrestrial Passive Acoustic Monitoring: Review and Perspectives, BioScience, 69, 15, 10.1093/biosci/biy147 · DOI
- McCallum, 2013, Changing Use of Camera Traps in Mammalian Field Research: Habitats, Taxa and Study Types, Mammal. Rev., 43, 196, 10.1111/j.1365-2907.2012.00216.x · DOI
- Chen, 2019, Wildlife Surveillance Using Deep Learning Methods, Ecol. Evol., 9, 9453, 10.1002/ece3.5410 · DOI
- Nguyen, H., Maclagan, S.J., Nguyen, T.D., Nguyen, T., Flemons, P., Andrews, K., Ritchie, E.G., and Phung, D. (2017, January 19–21). Animal Recognition and Identification with Deep Convolutional Neural Networks for Automated Wildlife Monitoring. Proceedings of the 2017 IEEE International Conference on Data Science and Advanced Analytics (DSAA), Tokyo, Japan. · DOI
- Verma, 2015, Microscope and Spectacle: On the Complexities of Using New Visual Technologies to Communicate about Wildlife Conservation, Ambio, 44, 648, 10.1007/s13280-015-0715-z · DOI
- Stephenson, 2020, Technological Advances in Biodiversity Monitoring: Applicability, Opportunities and Challenges, Curr. Opin. Environ. Sustain., 45, 36, 10.1016/j.cosust.2020.08.005 · DOI
- Zhang, 2022, Deep-IRTarget: An Automatic Target Detector in Infrared Imagery Using Dual-Domain Feature Extraction and Allocation, IEEE Trans. Multimed., 24, 1735, 10.1109/TMM.2021.3070138 · DOI
- Zhang, R., Cao, Z., Yang, S., Si, L., Sun, H., Xu, L., and Sun, F. (2024). Cognition-Driven Structural Prior for Instance-Dependent Label Transition Matrix Estimation. IEEE Trans. Neural Netw. Learn. Syst., 1–14. · DOI
- Magrath, 2021, A Comprehensive Overview of Technologies for Species and Habitat Monitoring and Conservation, BioScience, 71, 1038, 10.1093/biosci/biab073 · DOI
- Petso, 2022, Review on Methods Used for Wildlife Species and Individual Identification, Eur. J. Wildl. Res., 68, 3, 10.1007/s10344-021-01549-4 · DOI
- Adams, 2019, Geographies of Conservation II: Technology, Surveillance and Conservation by Algorithm, Prog. Hum. Geogr., 43, 337, 10.1177/0309132517740220 · DOI
- Zhang, 2021, Application of Deep Learning Algorithms in Geotechnical Engineering: A Short Critical Review, Artif. Intell. Rev., 54, 5633, 10.1007/s10462-021-09967-1 · DOI
- Willi, 2019, Identifying Animal Species in Camera Trap Images Using Deep Learning and Citizen Science, Methods Ecol. Evol., 10, 80, 10.1111/2041-210X.13099 · DOI
- Ding, 2024, U2D2Net: Unsupervised Unified Image Dehazing and Denoising Network for Single Hazy Image Enhancement, IEEE Trans. Multimed., 26, 202, 10.1109/TMM.2023.3263078 · DOI
- Simonyan, K., and Zisserman, A. (2014). Very Deep Convolutional Networks for Large-Scale Image Recognition. arXiv.
- Szegedy, C., Liu, W., Jia, Y., Sermanet, P., Reed, S., Anguelov, D., Erhan, D., Vanhoucke, V., and Rabinovich, A. (2015, January 7–12). Going Deeper with Convolutions. Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), Boston, MA, USA. · DOI · Paper page
- Huang, G., Liu, Z., van der Maaten, L., and Weinberger, K.Q. (2017, January 21–26). Densely Connected Convolutional Networks. Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), Honolulu, HI, USA. · DOI · Paper page
- Yin, 2024, Automatic Detection of Stereotypical Behaviors of Captive Wild Animals Based on Surveillance Videos of Zoos and Animal Reserves, Ecol. Inform., 79, 102450, 10.1016/j.ecoinf.2023.102450 · DOI
- Hou, 2023, Detecting Diseases in Apple Tree Leaves Using FPN–ISResNet–Faster RCNN, Eur. J. Remote Sens., 56, 2186955, 10.1080/22797254.2023.2186955 · DOI
- Wang, 2019, SAR Target Detection Based on SSD with Data Augmentation and Transfer Learning, IEEE Geosci. Remote Sens. Lett., 16, 150, 10.1109/LGRS.2018.2867242 · DOI
- Zhao, 2021, MobileNet-Yolo Based Wildlife Detection Model: A Case Study in Yunnan Tongbiguan Nature Reserve, China, J. Intell. Fuzzy Syst., 41, 2171, 10.3233/JIFS-210859 · DOI
- Xiong, B., Li, D., Zhang, Q., Desneux, N., Luo, C., and Hu, Z. (2024). Image Detection Model Construction of Apolygus lucorum and Empoasca spp. Based on Improved YOLOv5. Pest Manag. Sci., ps.7964. · DOI
- Roy, 2023, WilDect-YOLO: An Efficient and Robust Computer Vision-Based Accurate Object Localization Model for Automated Endangered Wildlife Detection, Ecol. Inform., 75, 101919, 10.1016/j.ecoinf.2022.101919 · DOI
- Liu, D., Hou, J., Huang, S., Liu, J., He, Y., Zheng, B., Ning, J., and Zhang, J. (2023, January 2–3). LoTE-Animal: A Long Time-Span Dataset for Endangered Animal Behavior Understanding. Proceedings of the 2023 IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV), Paris, France. · DOI
- Wang, Z., Jin, L., Wang, S., and Xu, H. (2022). Apple Stem/Calyx Real-Time Recognition Using YOLO-v5 Algorithm for Fruit Automatic Loading System. Postharvest Biol. Technol., 185. · DOI
- Liu, Y., Shao, Z., Teng, Y., and Hoffmann, N. (2021). NAM: Normalization-Based Attention Module. arXiv.
- Woo, S., Park, J., Lee, J.-Y., and Kweon, I.S. (2018, January 8–14). CBAM: Convolutional Block Attention Module. Proceedings of the European Conference on Computer Vision (ECCV), Munich, Germany. · DOI · Paper page
- Bochkovskiy, A., Wang, C.-Y., and Liao, H.-Y.M. (2020). YOLOv4: Optimal Speed and Accuracy of Object Detection. arXiv.
- Yang, 2021, Activation Function: Cell Recognition Based on YoLov5s/m, J. Comput. Commun., 9, 1, 10.4236/jcc.2021.912001 · DOI
- Zheng, 2020, Distance-IoU Loss: Faster and Better Learning for Bounding Box Regression, AAAI, 34, 12993, 10.1609/aaai.v34i07.6999 · DOI · Paper page
- Wu, 2020, IoU-Aware Single-Stage Object Detector for Accurate Localization, Image Vis. Comput., 97, 103911, 10.1016/j.imavis.2020.103911 · DOI · Paper page
- Tong, Z., Chen, Y., Xu, Z., and Yu, R. (2023). Wise-IoU: Bounding Box Regression Loss with Dynamic Focusing Mechanism. arXiv.
- Zhang, 2022, Graph-Based Few-Shot Learning with Transformed Feature Propagation and Optimal Class Allocation, Neurocomputing, 470, 247, 10.1016/j.neucom.2021.10.110 · DOI
- Xiong, 2024, A Novel YOLOv8-GAM-Wise-IoU Model for Automated Detection of Bridge Surface Cracks, Constr. Build. Mater., 414, 135025, 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2024.135025 · DOI
- Lin, T.-Y., Goyal, P., Girshick, R., He, K., and Dollar, P. (2017, January 21–26). Focal Loss for Dense Object Detection. Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), Honolulu, HI, USA. · DOI · Paper page
- Norouzzadeh, 2018, Automatically Identifying, Counting, and Describing Wild Animals in Camera-Trap Images with Deep Learning, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 115, E5716, 10.1073/pnas.1719367115 · DOI · Paper page
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Ali, M. L., & Zhang, Z. (2024) · Computers · doi:10.3390/computers13120336 · Cited by 383
Metadata
- Authors
- Su, X., Zhang, J., Ma, Z., Dong, Y., Zi, J., Xu, N., Zhang, H., Xu, F., & Chen, F.
- Affiliations
- Beijing Forestry University (CN)
- Corresponding author
- Chen, Feixiang
- Venue
- Remote Sensing
- Publisher
- MDPI AG
- Published
- 2024-04-26
- Volume
- 16
- Issue
- 9
- Pages
- 1535
- ISSN
- 2072-4292 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W4395676317
- Cited by
- 21
- References
- 4
- Citations by year
- 2026: 4 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 9
- FWCI
- 2.95
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Remote Sensing (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- Outstanding Youth Team Project of Central Universities (QNTD202308, 2022YFF1302700, 202303)
- National Key R&D Program of China (QNTD202308, 2022YFF1302700, 202303)
- Emergency Open Competition Project of the National Forestry and Grassland Administration (QNTD202308, 2022YFF1302700, 202303)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Advanced Neural Network Applications
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Smart Agriculture and AI
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Wildlife Ecology and Conservation
- Keywords
- wildlife monitoring, YOLOv5, WIoU loss, low-quality images, Giant Panda National Park, animal detection, wildlife conservation
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review