The Reconstruction of FY-4A and FY-4B Cloudless Top-of-Atmosphere Radiation and Full-Coverage Particulate Matter Products Reveals the Influence of Meteorological Factors in Pollution Events
Open accessAbstract
By utilizing top-of-atmosphere radiation (TOAR) data from China’s new generation of geostationary satellites (FY-4A and FY-4B) along with interpretable machine learning models, near-surface particulate matter concentrations in China were estimated, achieving hourly temporal resolution, 4 km spatial resolution, and 100% spatial coverage. First, the cloudless TOAR data were matched and modeled with the solar radiation products from the ERA5 dataset to construct and estimate a fully covered TOAR dataset under assumed clear-sky conditions, which increased coverage from 20–30% to 100%. Subsequently, this dataset was applied to estimate particulate matter. The analysis demonstrated that the fully covered TOAR dataset (R2 = 0.83) performed better than the original cloudless dataset (R2 = 0.76). Additionally, using feature importance scores and SHAP values, the impact of meteorological factors and air mass trajectories on the increase in PM10 and PM2.5 during dust events were investigated. The analysis of haze events indicated that the main meteorological factors driving changes in particulate matter included air pressure, temperature, and boundary layer height. The particulate matter concentration products obtained using fully covered TOAR data exhibit high coverage and high spatiotemporal resolution. Combined with data-driven interpretable machine learning, they can effectively reveal the influencing factors of particulate matter in China.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The composite reflectivity (CR) and cloud-top temperature (CTT) remote sensing products used in this study were quality-controlled data.
“Both products were quality-controlled data [43,44].”
From A Machine Learning-Based Quality Control Algorithm for Heavy Rainfall Using Multi-Source Data (2025) · cites this paper as [44]
Cited by
Sorted by citations
A Machine Learning-Based Quality Control Algorithm for Heavy Rainfall Using Multi-Source Data
Sun, H., Zhou, Q., Shi, L., Li, C., Qin, S., Yao, D., Xu, M., Huang, Y., Hu, Q., & Guan, Y. (2025) · Remote Sensing · doi:10.3390/rs17243976 · Cited by 4 · see citing works
- Authors
- Song, Z., Zhao, L., Ye, Q., Ren, Y., Chen, R., & Chen, B.
- Affiliations
- Lanzhou University (CN)
- Corresponding author
- Chen, Bin
- Venue
- Remote Sensing
- Publisher
- MDPI AG
- Published
- 2024-09-10
- Volume
- 16
- Issue
- 18
- Pages
- 3363
- ISSN
- 2072-4292 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W4402449496
- Cited by
- 6
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 5
- FWCI
- 1.06
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Remote Sensing (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- Funders
- Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (lzujbky-2023-ey10, 23JRRA1038, 41775021)
- Gansu Provincial Science and Technology Plan (lzujbky-2023-ey10, 23JRRA1038, 41775021)
- National Natural Science Foundation of China (lzujbky-2023-ey10, 23JRRA1038, 41775021)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Atmospheric aerosols and clouds
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Engineering › Air Quality Monitoring and Forecasting
- Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Atmospheric Science › Atmospheric chemistry and aerosols
- Keywords
- Fengyun-4A, geostationary satellites, top-of-atmosphere radiation, particulate matter estimation, PM10, PM2.5, dust events, haze events, meteorological factors, air mass back trajectories, boundary layer height, atmospheric pressure, temperature, model interpretability, SHAP, feature importance
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review