Cited by 6Atmospheric aerosols and cloudsAir Quality Monitoring and ForecastingAtmospheric chemistry and aerosols

The Reconstruction of FY-4A and FY-4B Cloudless Top-of-Atmosphere Radiation and Full-Coverage Particulate Matter Products Reveals the Influence of Meteorological Factors in Pollution Events

Open access
Song, Zhihao, Zhao, Lin, Ye, Qia, Ren, Yuxiang, Chen, Ruming, Chen, Bin·2024·Remote Sensing

Abstract

By utilizing top-of-atmosphere radiation (TOAR) data from China’s new generation of geostationary satellites (FY-4A and FY-4B) along with interpretable machine learning models, near-surface particulate matter concentrations in China were estimated, achieving hourly temporal resolution, 4 km spatial resolution, and 100% spatial coverage. First, the cloudless TOAR data were matched and modeled with the solar radiation products from the ERA5 dataset to construct and estimate a fully covered TOAR dataset under assumed clear-sky conditions, which increased coverage from 20–30% to 100%. Subsequently, this dataset was applied to estimate particulate matter. The analysis demonstrated that the fully covered TOAR dataset (R2 = 0.83) performed better than the original cloudless dataset (R2 = 0.76). Additionally, using feature importance scores and SHAP values, the impact of meteorological factors and air mass trajectories on the increase in PM10 and PM2.5 during dust events were investigated. The analysis of haze events indicated that the main meteorological factors driving changes in particulate matter included air pressure, temperature, and boundary layer height. The particulate matter concentration products obtained using fully covered TOAR data exhibit high coverage and high spatiotemporal resolution. Combined with data-driven interpretable machine learning, they can effectively reveal the influencing factors of particulate matter in China.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3390/rs16183363

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Song, Z., Zhao, L., Ye, Q., Ren, Y., Chen, R., & Chen, B.
Affiliations
Lanzhou University (CN)
Corresponding author
Chen, Bin
Venue
Remote Sensing
Publisher
MDPI AG
Published
2024-09-10
Volume
16
Issue
18
Pages
3363
ISSN
2072-4292 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4402449496
Cited by
6
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 5
FWCI
1.06
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Remote Sensing (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
  • Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (lzujbky-2023-ey10, 23JRRA1038, 41775021)
  • Gansu Provincial Science and Technology Plan (lzujbky-2023-ey10, 23JRRA1038, 41775021)
  • National Natural Science Foundation of China (lzujbky-2023-ey10, 23JRRA1038, 41775021)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Atmospheric aerosols and clouds
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Engineering › Air Quality Monitoring and Forecasting
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Atmospheric Science › Atmospheric chemistry and aerosols
Keywords
Fengyun-4A, geostationary satellites, top-of-atmosphere radiation, particulate matter estimation, PM10, PM2.5, dust events, haze events, meteorological factors, air mass back trajectories, boundary layer height, atmospheric pressure, temperature, model interpretability, SHAP, feature importance

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review