The DOI matches its Crossref record; 21 of the 21 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
An International Comparison of Individual Tree Detection and Extraction Using Airborne Laser Scanning
Open accessAbstract
The objective of the “Tree Extraction” project organized by EuroSDR (European Spatial data Research) and ISPRS (International Society of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing) was to evaluate the quality, accuracy, and feasibility of automatic tree extraction methods, mainly based on laser scanner data. In the final report of the project, Kaartinen and Hyyppä (2008) reported a high variation in the quality of the published methods under boreal forest conditions and with varying laser point densities. This paper summarizes the findings beyond the final report after analyzing the results obtained in different tree height classes. Omission/Commission statistics as well as neighborhood relations are taken into account. Additionally, four automatic tree detection and extraction techniques were added to the test. Several methods in this experiment were superior to manual processing in the dominant, co-dominant and suppressed tree storeys. In general, as expected, the taller the tree, the better the location accuracy. The accuracy of tree height, after removing gross errors, was better than 0.5 m in all tree height classes with the best methods investigated in this experiment. For forest inventory, minimum curvature-based tree detection accompanied by point cloud-based cluster detection for suppressed trees is a solution that deserves attention in the future.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Image analysis and mathematical morphology
(1982) · Computer Graphics and Image Processing · doi:10.1016/0146-664x(82)90078-8 · Cited by 8,151
Næsset, E. (2002) · Remote Sensing of Environment · doi:10.1016/s0034-4257(01)00290-5 · Cited by 1,430
Self-citationDetermination of terrain models in wooded areas with airborne laser scanner data
Kraus, K., & Pfeifer, N. (1998) · ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing · doi:10.1016/s0924-2716(98)00009-4 · Cited by 1,218
Detecting and measuring individual trees using an airborne laser scanner
Persson, Å., Holmgren, J., & Söderman, U. (2002) · Photogrammetric Engineering & Remote Sensing · Cited by 713
Popescu, S., Wynne, R. H., & NELSON, R. F. (2003) · Canadian Journal of Remote Sensing · doi:10.5589/m03-027 · Cited by 686
Self-citationSLOPE BASED FILTERING OF LASER ALTIMETRY DATA
George Vosselman, A. (2000) · Cited by 635
Determination of mean tree height of forest stands using airborne laser scanner data
Næsset, E. (1997) · ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing · doi:10.1016/s0924-2716(97)83000-6 · Cited by 604
Self-citationIdentifying species of individual trees using airborne laser scanner
Holmgren, J., & Persson, Å. (2004) · Remote Sensing of Environment · doi:10.1016/s0034-4257(03)00140-8 · Cited by 544
Estimating timber volume of forest stands using airborne laser scanner data
Næsset, E. (1997) · Remote Sensing of Environment · doi:10.1016/s0034-4257(97)00041-2 · Cited by 543
Self-citationBrandtberg, T. (2003) · Remote Sensing of Environment · doi:10.1016/s0034-4257(03)00008-7 · Cited by 430
Cited by
Generating pit-free canopy height models from airborne lidar
Khosravipour, A., Skidmore, A. K., Isenburg, M., Wang, T., & Hussin, Y. A. (2014) · Photogrammetric Engineering & Remote Sensing · doi:10.14358/pers.80.9.863 · Cited by 347
Hamraz, H., Contreras, M. A., & Zhang, J. (2017) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-017-07200-0 · Cited by 97
Metadata
- Authors
- Kaartinen, H., Hyyppä, J., Yu, X., Vastaranta, M., Hyyppä, H., Kukko, A., Holopainen, M., Heipke, C., Hirschmugl, M., Morsdorf, F., Næsset, E., Pitkänen, J., Popescu, S., Solberg, S., Wolf, B. M., & Wu, J.-C.
- Venue
- Remote Sensing
- Publisher
- MDPI AG
- Published
- 2012-03-30
- Volume
- 4
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 950-974
- ISSN
- 2072-4292 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2165044919
- Cited by
- 486
- References
- 21
- FWCI
- 27.01
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: An International Comparison of Individual Tree Detection and Extraction Using Airborne Laser Scanning. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.3390/rs4040950
- The paper
- Kaartinen, H., Hyyppä, J., Yu, X., Vastaranta, M., Hyyppä, H., Kukko, A., Holopainen, M., Heipke, C., Hirschmugl, M., Morsdorf, F., Næsset, E., Pitkänen, J., Popescu, S., Solberg, S., Wolf, B. M., & Wu, J.-C. (2012). An International Comparison of Individual Tree Detection and Extraction Using Airborne Laser Scanning. Remote Sensing. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs4040950
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.