The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A Non-Stationary 1981–2012 AVHRR NDVI3g Time Series
Open accessAbstract
The NDVI3g time series is an improved 8-km normalized difference vegetation index (NDVI) data set produced from Advanced Very High Resolution Radiometer (AVHRR) instruments that extends from 1981 to the present. The AVHRR instruments have flown or are flying on fourteen polar-orbiting meteorological satellites operated by the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) and are currently flying on two European Organization for the Exploitation of Meteorological Satellites (EUMETSAT) polar-orbiting meteorological satellites, MetOp-A and MetOp-B. This long AVHRR record is comprised of data from two different sensors: the AVHRR/2 instrument that spans July 1981 to November 2000 and the AVHRR/3 instrument that continues these measurements from November 2000 to the present. The main difficulty in processing AVHRR NDVI data is to properly deal with limitations of the AVHRR instruments. Complicating among-instrument AVHRR inter-calibration of channels one and two is the dual gain introduced in late 2000 on the AVHRR/3 instruments for both these channels. We have processed NDVI data derived from the Sea-Viewing Wide Field-of-view Sensor (SeaWiFS) from 1997 to 2010 to overcome among-instrument AVHRR calibration difficulties. We use Bayesian methods with high quality well-calibrated SeaWiFS NDVI data for deriving AVHRR NDVI calibration parameters. Evaluation of the uncertainties of our resulting NDVI values gives an error of ± 0.005 NDVI units for our 1981 to present data set that is independent of time within our AVHRR NDVI continuum and has resulted in a non-stationary climate data set.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Inverse Problem Theory and Methods for Model Parameter Estimation
Tarantola, A. (2005) · doi:10.1137/1.9780898717921 · Cited by 6,585
Metropolis, N., & Ulam, S. (1949) · Journal of the American Statistical Association · doi:10.1080/01621459.1949.10483310 · Cited by 6,474
Cited by
Global fire emissions estimates during 1997–2016
(2017) · doi:10.5194/essd-9-697-2017 · Cited by 2,493
Plant phenology and global climate change: Current progresses and challenges
Piao, S., Liu, Q., Chen, A., Janssens, I. A., Fu, Y., Dai, J., Liu, L., Lian, X., Shen, M., & Zhu, X. (2019) · Global Change Biology · doi:10.1111/gcb.14619 · Cited by 2,120
Sheffield, J., Wood, E. F., Pan, M., Beck, H., Coccia, G., Serrat‐Capdevila, A., & Verbist, K. (2018) · Water Resources Research · doi:10.1029/2017wr022437 · Cited by 561
Impacts of droughts on the growth resilience of Northern Hemisphere forests
Gazol, A., Camarero, J. J., Anderegg, W. R. L., & Vicente‐Serrano, S. M. (2017) · Global Ecology and Biogeography · doi:10.1111/geb.12526 · Cited by 429
Reduced streamflow in water-stressed climates consistent with CO2 effects on vegetation
Ukkola, A. M., Prentice, I. C., Keenan, T. F., van Dijk, A. I. J. M., Viney, N. R., Myneni, R. B., & Bi, J. (2016) · Nature Climate Change · doi:10.1038/nclimate2831 · Cited by 359
Metadata
- Authors
- Pinzon, J., & Tucker, C.
- Venue
- Remote Sensing
- Publisher
- MDPI AG
- Published
- 2014-07-25
- Volume
- 6
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 6929-6960
- ISSN
- 2072-4292 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1995091554
- Cited by
- 1,192
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 60.41
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A Non-Stationary 1981–2012 AVHRR NDVI3g Time Series. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.3390/rs6086929
- The paper
- Pinzon, J., & Tucker, C. (2014). A Non-Stationary 1981–2012 AVHRR NDVI3g Time Series. Remote Sensing. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs6086929
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
