The DOI matches its Crossref record; 33 of the 34 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Incremental and Enhanced Scanline-Based Segmentation Method for Surface Reconstruction of Sparse LiDAR Data
Open accessAbstract
The segmentation of point clouds is an important aspect of automated processing tasks such as semantic extraction. However, the sparsity and non-uniformity of the point clouds gathered by the popular 3D mobile LiDAR devices pose many challenges for existing segmentation methods. To improve the segmentation results of point clouds from mobile LiDAR devices, we propose an optimized segmentation method based on Scanline Continuity Constraint (SLCC) in this work. Unlike conventional scanline-based segmentation methods, SLCC clusters scanlines using the continuity constraints in terms of the distance as well as the direction of two consecutive points. In addition, scanline clusters are agglomerated not only into primitive geometrical shapes but also irregular shapes. Another downside to existing segmentation methods is that they are not capable of incremental processing. This causes unnecessary memory and time consumption for applications that require frame-wise segmentation or when new point clouds are added. In order to address this, we propose an incremental scheme—the Incremental Recursive Segmentation (IRIS), that can be easily applied to any segmentation method. IRIS is achieved by combining the segments of newly added point clouds and the previously segmented results. Furthermore, as an example application, we construct a processing pipeline consisting of plane fitting and surface reconstruction using the segmentation results. Finally, we evaluate the proposed methods on th…
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“For lidar, several filtering methods can be used to reduce clutter in the data such as ground extraction [162] or map-based filtering [163].”
From A Survey of Autonomous Driving: Common Practices and Emerging Technologies (2020) · cites this paper as [162]
Citations
Cites
Fischler, M. A., & Bolles, R. C. (1981) · Communications of the ACM · doi:10.1145/358669.358692 · Cited by 25,893
Vision meets robotics: The KITTI dataset
Geiger, A., Lenz, P., Stiller, C., & Urtasun, R. (2013) · The International Journal of Robotics Research · doi:10.1177/0278364913491297 · Cited by 9,913
3D is here: Point Cloud Library (PCL)
Rusu, R., & Cousins, S. (2011) · IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation · doi:10.1109/icra.2011.5980567 · Cited by 5,513
LOAM: Lidar Odometry and Mapping in Real-time
Zhang, J., & Singh, S. (2014) · Robotics: Science and Systems X · doi:10.15607/rss.2014.x.007 · Cited by 3,303
Iterative point matching for registration of free-form curves and surfaces
Zhang, Z. (1994) · International Journal of Computer Vision · doi:10.1007/bf01427149 · Cited by 2,438
Efficient RANSAC for Point‐Cloud Shape Detection
Schnabel, R., Wahl, R., & Klein, R. (2007) · Computer Graphics Forum · doi:10.1111/j.1467-8659.2007.01016.x · Cited by 2,222
3D Semantic Parsing of Large-Scale Indoor Spaces
Armeni, I., Şener, O., Zamir, A., Jiang, H., Brilakis, I., Fischer, M. A., & Savarese, S. (2016) · IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition/Proceedings - IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition/Proceedings · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2016.170 · Cited by 1,897
On the shape of a set of points in the plane
Edelsbrunner, H., Kirkpatrick, D., & Seidel, R. (1983) · IEEE Transactions on Information Theory · doi:10.1109/tit.1983.1056714 · Cited by 1,634
Two algorithms for constructing a Delaunay triangulation
Lee, D. T., & Schachter, B. J. (1980) · International Journal of Parallel Programming · doi:10.1007/bf00977785 · Cited by 1,629
Schroeder, W. J., & MARTIN, K. M. (2005) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-012387582-2/50032-0 · Cited by 1,363
Constrained delaunay triangulations
Chew, L. P. (1989) · Algorithmica · doi:10.1007/bf01553881 · Cited by 765
Weinmann, M., Jutzi, B., Hinz, S., & Mallet, C. (2015) · ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing · doi:10.1016/j.isprsjprs.2015.01.016 · Cited by 742
Voxel Cloud Connectivity Segmentation - Supervoxels for Point Clouds
Papon, J. A., Abramov, A., Schoeler, M., & Wörgötter, F. (2013) · IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition/Proceedings - IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition/Proceedings · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2013.264 · Cited by 561
On the segmentation of 3D LIDAR point clouds
Douillard, B., Underwood, J., Kuntz, N. R., Vlaskine, V., Quadros, A., Morton, P., & Frenkel, A. (2011) · Proceedings - IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation/Proceedings · doi:10.1109/icra.2011.5979818 · Cited by 477
Zebedee: Design of a Spring-Mounted 3-D Range Sensor with Application to Mobile Mapping
Bosse, M., Zlot, R., & Flick, P. (2012) · IEEE Transactions on Robotics · doi:10.1109/tro.2012.2200990 · Cited by 399
Segmentation of 3D lidar data in non-flat urban environments using a local convexity criterion
Moosmann, F., Pink, O., & Stiller, C. (2009) · IEEE Intelligent Vehicles Symposium · doi:10.1109/ivs.2009.5164280 · Cited by 292
Monszpart, Á., Mellado, N., Brostow, G., & Mitra, N. J. (2015) · ACM Transactions on Graphics · doi:10.1145/2766995 · Cited by 187
Mura, C., Mattausch, O., Villanueva, A. J., Gobbetti, E., & Pajarola, R. (2014) · Computers & Graphics · doi:10.1016/j.cag.2014.07.005 · Cited by 181
A Layered Approach to People Detection in 3D Range Data
Spinello, L., Arras, K. O., Triebel, R., & Siegwart, R. (2010) · Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1609/aaai.v24i1.7728 · Cited by 133
Three-dimensional alpha shapes
Edelsbrunner, H., & Mücke, E. P. (1992) · doi:10.1145/147130.147153 · Cited by 121
A fast and efficient projection-based approach for surface reconstruction
Gopi, M., & Krishnan, S. M. (2003) · Brazilian Symposium on Computer Graphics and Image Processing (SIBGRAPI) · doi:10.1109/sibgra.2002.1167141 · Cited by 101
Planar Shape Detection and Regularization in Tandem
Oesau, S., Lafarge, F., & Alliez, P. (2015) · Computer Graphics Forum · doi:10.1111/cgf.12720 · Cited by 88
Finding planes in LiDAR point clouds for real-time registration
Grant, W. S., Voorhies, R. C., & Itti, L. (2013) · IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS) · doi:10.1109/iros.2013.6696980 · Cited by 74
Semantic alignment of LiDAR data at city scale
Yu, F., Xiao, J., & Funkhouser, T. A. (2015) · IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition/Proceedings - IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition/Proceedings · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2015.7298781 · Cited by 71
Towards automatic indoor reconstruction of cluttered building rooms from point clouds
Previtali, M., Barazzetti, L., Brumana, R., & Scaioni, M. (2014) · ISPRS annals of the photogrammetry, remote sensing and spatial information sciences · doi:10.5194/isprsannals-ii-5-281-2014 · Cited by 68
SEGMENTATION OF LIDAR POINT CLOUDS FOR BUILDING EXTRACTION
Wang, J., & Shan, J. (2009) · Cited by 65
Incremental segmentation of lidar point clouds with an octree‐structured voxel space
Wang, M., & Tseng, Y. (2011) · The Photogrammetric Record · doi:10.1111/j.1477-9730.2011.00624.x · Cited by 64
Incremental and batch planar simplification of dense point cloud maps
Whelan, T. J., Ma, L., Bondarev, E., de With, P. H. N., & McDonald, J. (2014) · Robotics and Autonomous Systems · doi:10.1016/j.robot.2014.08.019 · Cited by 49
Indoor Localization Algorithms for an Ambulatory Human Operated 3D Mobile Mapping System
Corso, N., & Zakhor, A. (2013) · Remote Sensing · doi:10.3390/rs5126611 · Cited by 46
Watertight Planar Surface Meshing of Indoor Point-Clouds with Voxel Carving
Turner, E., & Zakhor, A. (2013) · International Conference on 3D Vision (3DV) · doi:10.1109/3dv.2013.14 · Cited by 25
Planar polygon extraction and merging from depth images
Biswas, J., & Veloso, M. (2012) · IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS) · doi:10.1109/iros.2012.6385841 · Cited by 25
Plane segmentation and decimation of point clouds for 3D environment reconstruction
Ma, L., Favier, R., Do, L., Bondarev, E., & de With, P. H. N. (2013) · IEEE Consumer Communications and Networking Conference · doi:10.1109/ccnc.2013.6488423 · Cited by 20
Panoramic rendering-based polygon extraction from indoor mobile LiDAR data
Nakagawa, M., Kataoka, K., Yamamoto, T., Shiozaki, M., & Ohhashi, T. (2014) · The international archives of the photogrammetry, remote sensing and spatial information sciences/International archives of the photogrammetry, remote sensing and spatial information sciences · doi:10.5194/isprsarchives-xl-4-181-2014 · Cited by 5
Research works printed but not linked: 3
- Rabbani, 2006, Segmentation of point clouds using smoothness constraint, ISPRS Int. Arch. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spat. Inf. Sci., 36, 248
- Oehler, B., Stueckler, J., Welle, J., Schulz, D., and Behnke, S. (2011). Intelligent Robotics and Applications, Springer.
- Segal, A., Haehnel, D., and Thrun, S. (July, January 28). Generalized-ICP. Proceedings of the Robotics: Science and Systems V, Seattle, WA, USA.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
A Survey of Autonomous Driving: Common Practices and Emerging Technologies
Yurtsever, E., Lambert, J., Carballo, A., & Takeda, K. (2020) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2020.2983149 · Cited by 1,889
“Traditional methods often used euclidean clustering [158] or region-growing methods [159] for grouping points into objects.”
Path planning algorithms in the autonomous driving system: A comprehensive review
Reda, M., Onsy, A., Haikal, A. Y., & Ghanbari, A. (2024) · Robotics and Autonomous Systems · doi:10.1016/j.robot.2024.104630 · Cited by 348
Performance Analysis of 10 Models of 3D LiDARs for Automated Driving
Lambert, J., Carballo, A., Monrroy, A., Narksri, P., Wong, D., Takeuchi, E., & Takeda, K. (2020) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2020.3009680 · Cited by 118
Wang, W., Sakurada, K., & Kawaguchi, N. (2017) · Remote Sensing · doi:10.3390/rs9080851 · Cited by 116
Self-citationSemantic line framework-based indoor building modeling using backpacked laser scanning point cloud
Wang, C., Hou, S., Wen, C., Gong, Z., Li, Q., Sun, X., & Li, J. (2018) · ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing · doi:10.1016/j.isprsjprs.2018.03.025 · Cited by 102
Metadata
- Authors
- Wang, W., Sakurada, K., & Kawaguchi, N.
- Affiliations
- Nagoya University (JP)
- Institutes of Innovation for Future Society, Nagoya University (JP)
- Corresponding author
- Wang, Weimin
- Venue
- Remote Sensing
- Publisher
- MDPI AG
- Published
- 2016-11-22
- Volume
- 8
- Issue
- 11
- Pages
- 967
- ISSN
- 2072-4292 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2552088091
- Cited by
- 16
- References
- 34
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 2 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 1
- FWCI
- 1.44
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Remote Sensing (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Graphics and Computer-Aided Design › 3D Shape Modeling and Analysis
- Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Geology › 3D Surveying and Cultural Heritage
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Forestry › Remote Sensing and LiDAR Applications
- Keywords
- point cloud segmentation, mobile laser scanning, sparse point clouds, recursive segmentation, surface reconstruction, plane fitting, 3D point clouds
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
