The DOI matches its Crossref record; 36 of the 36 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Retrieving Soybean Leaf Area Index from Unmanned Aerial Vehicle Hyperspectral Remote Sensing: Analysis of RF, ANN, and SVM Regression Models
Open accessAbstract
Leaf area index (LAI) is an important indicator of plant growth and yield that can be monitored by remote sensing. Several models were constructed using datasets derived from SRS and STR sampling methods to determine the optimal model for soybean (multiple strains) LAI inversion for the whole crop growth period and a single growth period. Random forest (RF), artificial neural network (ANN), and support vector machine (SVM) regression models were compared with a partial least-squares regression (PLS) model. The RF model yielded the highest precision, accuracy, and stability with V-R2, SDR2, V-RMSE, and SDRMSE values of 0.741, 0.031, 0.106, and 0.005, respectively, over the whole growth period based on STR sampling. The ANN model had the highest precision, accuracy, and stability (0.452, 0.132, 0.086, and 0.009, respectively) over a single growth phase based on STR sampling. The precision, accuracy, and stability of the RF, ANN, and SVM models were improved by inclusion of STR sampling. The RF model is suitable for estimating LAI when sample plots and variation are relatively large (i.e., the whole growth period or more than one growth period). The ANN model is more appropriate for estimating LAI when sample plots and variation are relatively low (i.e., a single growth period).
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Breiman, L. (2001) · Machine Learning · doi:10.1023/a:1010933404324 · Cited by 133,538
Cortes, C., & Vapnik, V. (1995) · Machine Learning · doi:10.1007/bf00994018 · Cited by 59,421
Wu, Y. (1999) · Technometrics · doi:10.1080/00401706.1999.10485951 · Cited by 27,221
Classification and Regression by randomForest
Liaw, A. I., & Wiener, M. C. (2007) · Cited by 18,594
Partial least-squares regression: a tutorial
Geladi, P., & Kowalski, B. R. (1986) · Analytica Chimica Acta · doi:10.1016/0003-2670(86)80028-9 · Cited by 6,992
Sample size in qualitative research
Sandelowski, M. (1995) · Research in Nursing & Health · doi:10.1002/nur.4770180211 · Cited by 4,372
A predictive approach to the random effect model
GEISSER, S. (1974) · Biometrika · doi:10.1093/biomet/61.1.101 · Cited by 2,961
A Continuous Satellite-Derived Measure of Global Terrestrial Primary Production
RUNNING, S. W., NEMANI, R. R., HEINSCH, F. A., ZHAO, M., REEVES, M., & HASHIMOTO, H. (2004) · BioScience · doi:10.1641/0006-3568(2004)054[0547:acsmog]2.0.co;2 · Cited by 2,454
Tu, J. V. (1996) · Journal of Clinical Epidemiology · doi:10.1016/s0895-4356(96)00002-9 · Cited by 1,818
The pls Package: Principal Component and Partial Least Squares Regression in R
Mevik, B.-H., & Wehrens, R. (2007) · Journal of Statistical Software · doi:10.18637/jss.v018.i02 · Cited by 1,782
Metadata
- Authors
- Yuan, H., Yang, G., Li, C., Wang, Y., Liu, J., Yu, H., Feng, H., Xu, B., Zhao, X., & Yang, X.
- Venue
- Remote Sensing
- Publisher
- MDPI AG
- Published
- 2017-03-25
- Volume
- 9
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 309
- ISSN
- 2072-4292 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2600798029
- Cited by
- 283
- References
- 36
- FWCI
- 16.43
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Retrieving Soybean Leaf Area Index from Unmanned Aerial Vehicle Hyperspectral Remote Sensing: Analysis of RF, ANN, and SVM Regression Models. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.3390/rs9040309
- The paper
- Yuan, H., Yang, G., Li, C., Wang, Y., Liu, J., Yu, H., Feng, H., Xu, B., Zhao, X., & Yang, X. (2017). Retrieving Soybean Leaf Area Index from Unmanned Aerial Vehicle Hyperspectral Remote Sensing: Analysis of RF, ANN, and SVM Regression Models. Remote Sensing. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs9040309
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.