The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Review of the Current State of UAV Regulations
Open accessAbstract
UAVs—unmanned aerial vehicles—facilitate data acquisition at temporal and spatial scales that still remain unachievable for traditional remote sensing platforms. However, current legal frameworks that regulate UAVs present significant barriers to research and development. To highlight the importance, impact, and diversity of UAV regulations, this paper provides an exploratory investigation of UAV regulations on the global scale. For this, the methodological approach consists of a research synthesis of UAV regulations, including a thorough literature review and a comparative analysis of national regulatory frameworks. Similarities and contrasting elements in the various national UAV regulations are explored including their statuses from the perspectives of past, present, and future trends. Since the early 2000s, countries have gradually established national legal frameworks. Although all UAV regulations have one common goal—minimizing the risks to other airspace users and to both people and property on the ground—the results reveal distinct variations in all the compared variables. Furthermore, besides the clear presence of legal frameworks, market forces such as industry design standards and reliable information about UAVs as public goods are expected to shape future developments.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Security analysis of drones systems: Attacks, limitations, and recommendations
Yaacoub, J.-P., Noura, H., Salman, O., & Chehab, A. (2020) · Internet of Things · doi:10.1016/j.iot.2020.100218 · Cited by 727
Drones for parcel and passenger transportation: A literature review
Kellermann, R., Biehle, T., & Fischer, L. (2020) · Transportation Research Interdisciplinary Perspectives · doi:10.1016/j.trip.2019.100088 · Cited by 319
A Tutorial on UAVs for Wireless Networks: Applications, Challenges, and Open Problems
Mozaffari, M., Saad, W., Bennis, M., Nam, Y.-H., & Debbah, M. (2019) · IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials · doi:10.1109/comst.2019.2902862 · Cited by 299
Applications of blockchain in unmanned aerial vehicles: A review
Alladi, T., Chamola, V., Sahu, N., & Guizani, M. (2020) · Vehicular Communications · doi:10.1016/j.vehcom.2020.100249 · Cited by 274
Cognition in UAV-Aided 5G and Beyond Communications: A Survey
Ullah, Z., Al-Turjman, F., & Mostarda, L. (2020) · IEEE Transactions on Cognitive Communications and Networking · doi:10.1109/tccn.2020.2968311 · Cited by 226
Metadata
- Authors
- Stöcker, C., Bennett, R., Nex, F., Gerke, M., & Zevenbergen, J.
- Venue
- Remote Sensing
- Publisher
- MDPI AG
- Published
- 2017-05-09
- Volume
- 9
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 459
- ISSN
- 2072-4292 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2613927007
- Cited by
- 596
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 252.03
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Review of the Current State of UAV Regulations. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.3390/rs9050459
- The paper
- Stöcker, C., Bennett, R., Nex, F., Gerke, M., & Zevenbergen, J. (2017). Review of the Current State of UAV Regulations. Remote Sensing. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs9050459
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.