The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Digital Counts of Maize Plants by Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs)
Open accessAbstract
Precision phenotyping, especially the use of image analysis, allows researchers to gain information on plant properties and plant health. Aerial image detection with unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) provides new opportunities in precision farming and precision phenotyping. Precision farming has created a critical need for spatial data on plant density. The plant number reflects not only the final field emergence but also allows a more precise assessment of the final yield parameters. The aim of this work is to advance UAV use and image analysis as a possible high-throughput phenotyping technique. In this study, four different maize cultivars were planted in plots with different seeding systems (in rows and equidistantly spaced) and different nitrogen fertilization levels (applied at 50, 150 and 250 kg N/ha). The experimental field, encompassing 96 plots, was overflown at a 50-m height with an octocopter equipped with a 10-megapixel camera taking a picture every 5 s. Images were recorded between BBCH 13–15 (it is a scale to identify the phenological development stage of a plant which is here the 3- to 5-leaves development stage) when the color of young leaves differs from older leaves. Close correlations up to R2 = 0.89 were found between in situ and image-based counted plants adapting a decorrelation stretch contrast enhancement procedure, which enhanced color differences in the images. On average, the error between visually and digitally counted plants was ≤5%. Ground cover, as determined by analyzing green pixels, ranged between 76% and 83% at these stages. However, the correlation between ground cover and digitally counted plants was very low. The presence of weeds and blurry effects on the images represent possible errors in counting plants. In conclusion, the final field emergence of maize can rapidly be assessed and allows more precise assessment of the final yield parameters. The use of UAVs and image processing has the potential to optimize farm management and to support field experimentation for agronomic and breeding purposes.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Science, technology and the future of small autonomous drones
Floreano, D., & Wood, R. J. (2015) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature14542 · Cited by 1,476
Cited by
Internet-of-Things (IoT)-Based Smart Agriculture: Toward Making the Fields Talk
Ayaz, M., Ammad-Uddin, M., Sharif, Z., Mansour, A., & Aggoune, E.-H. M. (2019) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2019.2932609 · Cited by 1,306
What good are unmanned aircraft systems for agricultural remote sensing and precision agriculture?
Hunt, E. R., & Daughtry, C. S. T. (2018) · International Journal of Remote Sensing · doi:10.1080/01431161.2017.1410300 · Cited by 325
Metadata
- Authors
- Gnädinger, F., & Schmidhalter, U.
- Venue
- Remote Sensing
- Publisher
- MDPI AG
- Published
- 2017-05-31
- Volume
- 9
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 544
- ISSN
- 2072-4292 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2618732405
- Cited by
- 181
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 13.23
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Digital Counts of Maize Plants by Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs). https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.3390/rs9060544
- The paper
- Gnädinger, F., & Schmidhalter, U. (2017). Digital Counts of Maize Plants by Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs). Remote Sensing. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs9060544
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.