The DOI matches its Crossref record; 34 of the 34 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Detecting Falls with Wearable Sensors Using Machine Learning Techniques
Open accessAbstract
Falls are a serious public health problem and possibly life threatening for people in fall risk groups. We develop an automated fall detection system with wearable motion sensor units fitted to the subjects’ body at six different positions. Each unit comprises three tri-axial devices (accelerometer, gyroscope, and magnetometer/compass). Fourteen volunteers perform a standardized set of movements including 20 voluntary falls and 16 activities of daily living (ADLs), resulting in a large dataset with 2520 trials. To reduce the computational complexity of training and testing the classifiers, we focus on the raw data for each sensor in a 4 s time window around the point of peak total acceleration of the waist sensor, and then perform feature extraction and reduction. Most earlier studies on fall detection employ rule-based approaches that rely on simple thresholding of the sensor outputs. We successfully distinguish falls from ADLs using six machine learning techniques (classifiers): the k-nearest neighbor (k-NN) classifier, least squares method (LSM), support vector machines (SVM), Bayesian decision making (BDM), dynamic time warping (DTW), and artificial neural networks (ANNs). We compare the performance and the computational complexity of the classifiers and achieve the best results with the k-NN classifier and LSM, with sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy all above 99%. These classifiers also have acceptable computational requirements for training and testing. Our approach would be applicable in real-world scenarios where data records of indeterminate length, containing multiple activities in sequence, are recorded.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
LIBSVM: A library for support vector machines
Chang, C.-C., & Lin, C.-J. (2011) · ACM Transactions on Intelligent Systems and Technology · doi:10.1145/1961189.1961199 · Cited by 40,918
Neural Networks And Learning Machines
Haykin, S. (2010) · Cited by 6,609
Activity recognition using cell phone accelerometers
Kwapisz, J. R., Weiss, G. M., & Moore, S. A. (2011) · ACM SIGKDD Explorations Newsletter · doi:10.1145/1964897.1964918 · Cited by 2,912 · cited 1×
“Furthermore, smartphones that usually contain embedded accelerometers are suitable devices for executing fall detection algorithms [24–26].”
MethodPattern Classification (2nd ed.)
Duda, R. O., Hart, P. E., & Stork, D. G. (1999) · Cited by 2,520
Exact indexing of dynamic time warping
Keogh, E., & Ratanamahatana, C. A. (2005) · Knowledge and Information Systems · doi:10.1007/s10115-004-0154-9 · Cited by 1,962
A Review of Accelerometry-Based Wearable Motion Detectors for Physical Activity Monitoring
Yang, C.-C., & Hsu, Y.-L. (2010) · Sensors · doi:10.3390/s100807772 · Cited by 1,058
A survey on fall detection: Principles and approaches
Mubashir, M., Shao, L., & Seed, L. (2013) · Neurocomputing · doi:10.1016/j.neucom.2011.09.037 · Cited by 869
Fall detection - Principles and Methods
Noury, N., Fleury, A., Rumeau, P., Bourke, A. K., Laighin, G. O., Rialle, V., & Lundy, J. E. (2007) · 2007 29th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society · doi:10.1109/iembs.2007.4352627 · Cited by 615
Evaluation of Accelerometer-Based Fall Detection Algorithms on Real-World Falls
Bagalà, F., Becker, C., Cappello, A., Chiari, L., Aminian, K., Hausdorff, J. M., Zijlstra, W., & Klenk, J. (2012) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0037062 · Cited by 464
Ambulatory Position and Orientation Tracking Fusing Magnetic and Inertial Sensing
Roetenberg, D., Slycke, P. J., & Veltink, P. H. (2007) · IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering · doi:10.1109/tbme.2006.889184 · Cited by 334
Cited by
Automated machine learning: Review of the state-of-the-art and opportunities for healthcare
Waring, J., Lindvall, C., & Umeton, R. (2020) · Artificial Intelligence in Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.artmed.2020.101822 · Cited by 834
Machine learning in medical applications: a review of state-of-the-art methods
Shehab, M., Abualigah, L., Shambour, Q., Abu-Hashem, M. A., Shambour, M. K. Y., Alsalibi, A. I., & Gandomi, A. H. (2022) · Computers in Biology and Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.compbiomed.2022.105458 · Cited by 542
Applications of machine learning methods for engineering risk assessment – A review
Hegde, J., & Rokseth, B. (2020) · Safety Science · doi:10.1016/j.ssci.2019.09.015 · Cited by 363
A review of AI Technologies for Wearable Devices
Jin, C. Y. (2019) · IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering · doi:10.1088/1757-899x/688/4/044072 · Cited by 32
Metadata
- Authors
- Özdemir, A., & Barshan, B.
- Venue
- Sensors
- Publisher
- MDPI AG
- Published
- 2014-06-18
- Volume
- 14
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 10691-10708
- ISSN
- 1424-8220 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2146291834
- Cited by
- 375
- References
- 34
- FWCI
- 20.47
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Detecting Falls with Wearable Sensors Using Machine Learning Techniques. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.3390/s140610691
- The paper
- Özdemir, A., & Barshan, B. (2014). Detecting Falls with Wearable Sensors Using Machine Learning Techniques. Sensors. https://doi.org/10.3390/s140610691
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.