Cited by 197Analytical Chemistry and SensorsElectrochemical sensors and biosensorsBiosensors and Analytical Detection

EGFET-Based Sensors for Bioanalytical Applications: A Review

Open access
Pullano, Salvatore Andrea, Critello, Costantino Davide, Mahbub, Ifana, Tasneem, Nishat Tarannum, Shamsir, Samira, Islam, Syed Kamrul, Greco, Marta, Fiorillo, Antonino S.·2018·Sensors

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

Since the 1970s, a great deal of attention has been paid to the development of semiconductor-based biosensors because of the numerous advantages they offer, including high sensitivity, faster response time, miniaturization, and low-cost manufacturing for quick biospecific analysis with reusable features. Commercial biosensors have become highly desirable in the fields of medicine, food, and environmental monitoring as well as military applications, whereas increasing concerns about food safety and health issues have resulted in the introduction of novel legislative standards for these sensors. Numerous devices have been developed for monitoring biological processes such as nucleic acid hybridization, protein–protein interaction, antigen–antibody bonds, and substrate–enzyme reactions, just to name a few. Since the 1980s, scientific interest moved to the development of semiconductor-based devices, which also include integrated front-end electronics, such as the extended-gate field-effect transistor (EGFET) biosensor, one of the first miniaturized chemical sensors. This work is intended to be a review of the state of the art focused on the development of biosensors and chemosensors based on extended-gate field-effect transistor within the field of bioanalytical applications, which will highlight the most recent research reported in the literature. Moreover, a comparison among the diverse EGFET devices will be presented, giving particular attention to the materials and technologies.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3390/s18114042

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Electrochemical glucose sensors can be divided into potentiometric, amperometric, or conductometric.

    “Electrochemical glucose sensors can be divided into potentiometric (employed to detect variations of surface charge onto a counter electrode), amperometric (charge flow between the counter electrode and the bio-system), or conductometric (variations in ionic conductance between electrodes) 74,75.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 216 · Cited by 197

Research works printed but not linked: 20

  1. [2]Luz R.A.S. Rodrigo M. Crespilho I. Crespilho F.N. Nanomaterials for Biosensors and Implantable Biodevices Nanobioelectrochemistry: From Implantable Biosensors to Green Power Generation Springer Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany 2013 27 28 978-3-642-29249-1
  2. [17]Valdes Zaldivar E. Lastres Capote A. Horna C.D. Arias de Fuentes O. Estudio de la deriva del isfet utilizando instrumentaciòn virtual Proceedings of the XI IBERCHIP Workshop Salvador de Bahía, Brazil 28–30 March 2005
  3. [26]Mokhtarifar N. Goldschmidtboeing F. Woias P. Low-cost EGFET-based pH-sensor using encapsulated ITO/PET-electrodes Proceedings of the 2018 IEEE International Instrumentation and Measurement Technology Conference (I2MTC) Houston, TX, USA 14–17 July 2018
  4. [34]Brouk I. Nemirovsky Y. l/f noise in CMOS transistors for analog applications Proceedings of the 21st IEEE Convention of the Electrical and Electronic Engineers in Israel Tel-Aviv, Israel 11–12 April 2001
  5. [43]Magee A. Fabrication and design of EGFET devices for biosensing Proceedings of the NNIN REU Research Accomplishments Ithaca, NY, USA 9–12 August 2015
  6. [47]Ho C. Yu H.-Z. Aptamer-based electrochemical biosensors for the detection of small molecules and plasma proteins Microelectrode Biosensors. Neuromethods Marinesco S. Dale N. Humana Press Totowa, NJ, USA 2013 Volume 80 319 346
  7. [70]Islam A.B. Islam S.K. Rahman T. A highly selective mediator less glucose detector employing vertically aligned carbon nanofiber (VACNF) Proceedings of the 2010 IEEE Sensors Kona, HI, USA 1–4 November 2010
  8. [72]Islam S.K. Mahbub I. Shamsir S. Carbon nanomaterial based sensors for astrobiology exploration Proceedings of the 2017 IEEE 60th International Midwest Symposium on Circuits and Systems (MWSCAS) Boston, MA, USA 6–9 August 2017
  9. [84]Lakadamyali M. Rust M.J. Babcock H.P. Zhuang X. Visualizing infection of individual influenza viruses Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2013 100 9280 9285 10.1073/pnas.0832269100 12883000 PMC170909 · DOI
  10. [86]Siqueira J.R. Fernandes E.G.R. de Oliveira O.N. Zucolotto V. Biosensors Based on Field-Effect Devices Nanobioelectrochemistry Crespilho F. Springer Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany 2013
  11. [103]Chou J.C. Tzeng D.J. Study on the characteristics of the ruthenium oxide pH electrode Rare Met. Mater. Eng. 2006 35 603 612 10.1016/j.snb.2007.07.023 · DOI
  12. [117]Silva G.O. Mulato M. Urea-EnFET biosensor based on pHEGFET using FTO and ITO support films Proceedings of the 223rd ECS Meeting Toronto, ON, Canada 12–16 May 2013
  13. [126]Sungur S. Murat Elcin Y. Akbulut U. Studies on immobilization of urease in gelatin by cross-linking Biomaterials 2003 13 795 800 10.1016/0142-9612(92)90020-O 1391402 · DOI
  14. [128]Ulber R. Scheper T. Enzyme Biosensors Based on ISFETs Enzyme and Microbial Biosensors Mulchandani A. Rogers K.R. Methods in Biotechnology Humana Press New York, NY, USA 1998 Volume 6
  15. [135]Chiu Y.-S. Tseng C.-Y. Lee C.-T. An extended-gate CMOS sensor array with enzyme-immobilized microbeads for redox-potential glucose detection Proceedings of the Biomedical Circuits and Systems Conference (BioCAS) Lausanne, Switzerland 22–24 October 2014
  16. [148]Chung W.-Y. Silverio A.A. Tsai V.F.S. Cheng C. Chang S.-Y. Ming-Ying Z. Kaoc C.-Y. Chend S.-Y. Pijanowska D. An implementation of an electronic tongue system based on a multi-sensor potentiometric readout circuit with embedded calibration and temperature compensation Proceedings of the IEEE Sensors Conference Busan, Korea 1–4 November 2015
  17. [166]Lin F. Chang H.Y. Hsiao S.H. Chen H.I. Liu W.C. Preparation and characterization of nickel oxide-based EGFET pH sensors Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Sensing Technology (ICST) Auckland, New Zealand 8–10 December 2015
  18. [168]Zulkefle M.A. Rahman R.A. Mahmood M.R. Abdullah W.F.H. Herman S.H. Sensing capability of TiO2 thin films with different thicknesses as sensing membrane of EGFET pH sensor Proceedings of the International Symposium on Technology Management and Emerging Technologies (ISTMET) Langkawai Island, Malaysia 25–27 August 2015
  19. [169]Rosli A.B. Shariffudin S.S. Awang Z. Herman S.H. Deposition temperature dependence of ZnO nanostructures growth using TCVD for EGFET pH sensor Proceedings of the IEEE Regional Symposium on Micro and Nanoelectronics (RSM) Batu Ferringhi, Malaysia 23–25 August 2017
  20. [172]Arafa H. Obahiagbon U. Kullman D. Dominguez F.-J. Magee A. Christen J.B. Characterization and application of a discrete quartz extended-gate ISFET for the assessment of tumor cell viability, International Conference on Electrical Proceedings of the Electronics and System Engineering (ICEESE) Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia 9–10 December 2014

Authors
Pullano, S. A., Critello, C. D., Mahbub, I., Tasneem, N. T., Shamsir, S., Islam, S. K., Greco, M., & Fiorillo, A. S.
Affiliations
  • Magna Graecia University (IT)
  • University of North Texas (US)
  • University of Missouri (US)
Corresponding author
Pullano, Salvatore Andrea
Venue
Sensors
Publisher
MDPI AG
Published
2018-11-20
Volume
18
Issue
11
Pages
4042
ISSN
1424-8220 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2900514596
Cited by
197
References
216
Citations by year
2026: 26 · 2025: 20 · 2024: 38 · 2023: 19 · 2022: 34 · 2021: 27 · 2020: 17 · 2019: 15 · 2018: 1
FWCI
1.98
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Sensors (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Preprints.org (acceptedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • University of North Texas Digital Library (University of North Texas) (submittedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Chemical Engineering › Bioengineering › Analytical Chemistry and Sensors
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Electrochemical sensors and biosensors
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Biosensors and Analytical Detection
Keywords
extended-gate field-effect transistor, semiconductor biosensors, chemical sensors, bioanalytical applications, nucleic acid hybridization, protein-protein interaction, antigen-antibody reaction
MeSH terms
Calcium, DNA, Glucose, Humans, Miniaturization, Transistors, Electronic, Urea, Biosensing Techniques, Electrochemical Techniques

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review