Cited by 26AI in cancer detectionCell Image Analysis TechniquesRadiomics and Machine Learning in Medical Imaging

Efficiency of Machine Learning Algorithms for the Determination of Macrovesicular Steatosis in Frozen Sections Stained with Sudan to Evaluate the Quality of the Graft in Liver Transplantation

Open access
Pérez-Sanz, Fernando, Riquelme-Pérez, Miriam, Martínez-Barba, Enrique, de la Peña-Moral, Jesús, Salazar Nicolás, Alejandro, Carpes-Ruiz, Marina, Esteban-Gil, Angel, Legaz-García, María Del Carmen +3 more·2021·Sensors

Abstract

Liver transplantation is the only curative treatment option in patients diagnosed with end-stage liver disease. The low availability of organs demands an accurate selection procedure based on histological analysis, in order to evaluate the allograft. This assessment, traditionally carried out by a pathologist, is not exempt from subjectivity. In this sense, new tools based on machine learning and artificial vision are continuously being developed for the analysis of medical images of different typologies. Accordingly, in this work, we develop a computer vision-based application for the fast and automatic objective quantification of macrovesicular steatosis in histopathological liver section slides stained with Sudan stain. For this purpose, digital microscopy images were used to obtain thousands of feature vectors based on the RGB and CIE L*a*b* pixel values. These vectors, under a supervised process, were labelled as fat vacuole or non-fat vacuole, and a set of classifiers based on different algorithms were trained, accordingly. The results obtained showed an overall high accuracy for all classifiers (>0.99) with a sensitivity between 0.844 and 1, together with a specificity >0.99. In relation to their speed when classifying images, KNN and Naïve Bayes were substantially faster than other classification algorithms. Sudan stain is a convenient technique for evaluating ME in pre-transplant liver biopsies, providing reliable contrast and facilitating fast and accurate quantification through the machine learning algorithms tested.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3390/s21061993

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The Perez-Sanz et al. algorithm, available as an open-source interactive web platform, proved highly accurate in comparison with the assessment of an expert pathologist.

    “Their algorithm, available as an open-source interactive web platform (50), proved highly accurate in comparison with the assessment of an expert pathologist.”
  • Perez-Sanz et al. developed a quick and easy workflow to quantify steatosis content in Sudan-stained frozen sections of procurement biopsies through machine learning.

    “Perez-Sanz et al. developed a quick and easy workflow to quantify steatosis content in Sudan-stained frozen sections of procurement biopsies through machine learning.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 34 · Cited by 26

Authors
Pérez-Sanz, F., Riquelme-Pérez, M., Martínez-Barba, E., de la Peña-Moral, J., Salazar Nicolás, A., Carpes-Ruiz, M., Esteban-Gil, A., Legaz-García, M. D. C., Parreño-González, M. A., Ramírez, P., & Martínez, C. M.
Affiliations
  • Biomedical Informatics & Bioinformatics Service, Institute for Biomedical Research of Murcia (IMIB), 30120 Murcia, Spain
  • CNRS-CEA, University Paris-Saclay, MIRCen, 92265 Paris, France
  • Pathology Service, University Clinical Hospital Virgen de la Arrixaca-Biomedical Research Institute of Murcia (IMIB), 30120 Murcia, Spain
  • Experimental Pathology Service, Institute for Biomedical Research of Murcia (IMIB), 30120 Murcia, Spain
  • Instituto Murciano de Investigación Biosanitaria (ES)
Corresponding author
Ramírez, Pablo
Venue
Sensors
Publisher
MDPI AG
Published
2021-03-12
Volume
21
Issue
6
Pages
1993
ISSN
1424-8220 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3138668040
Cited by
26
References
34
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 7
FWCI
1.41
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Sensors (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
Fundación Séneca (21104/PDC/19)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › AI in cancer detection
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Biophysics › Cell Image Analysis Techniques
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Radiomics and Machine Learning in Medical Imaging
Keywords
macrovesicular steatosis, liver transplantation, computer vision, histopathology image analysis, machine learning classifiers, k-nearest neighbors, naive Bayes, graft quality assessment, end-stage liver disease
MeSH terms
Machine Learning, Algorithms, Bayes Theorem, Frozen Sections, Humans, Sudan, Liver Transplantation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review