Cited by 119Digital Transformation in IndustryIoT and Edge/Fog ComputingAdvanced Data and IoT Technologies

Key Challenges and Emerging Technologies in Industrial IoT Architectures: A Review

Open access
Mirani, Akseer Ali, Velasco-Hernandez, Gustavo, Awasthi, Anshul, Walsh, Joseph·2022·Sensors

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

The Industrial Internet of Things (IIoT) is bringing evolution with remote monitoring, intelligent analytics, and control of industrial processes. However, as the industrial world is currently in its initial stage of adopting full-stack development solutions with IIoT, there is a need to address the arising challenges. In this regard, researchers have proposed IIoT architectures based on different architectural layers and emerging technologies for the end-to-end integration of IIoT systems. In this paper, we review and compare three widely accepted IIoT reference architectures and present a state-of-the-art review of conceptual and experimental IIoT architectures from the literature. We identified scalability, interoperability, security, privacy, reliability, and low latency as the main IIoT architectural requirements and detailed how the current architectures address these challenges by using emerging technologies such as edge/fog computing, blockchain, SDN, 5G, Machine Learning, and Wireless Sensor Networks (WSN). Finally, we discuss the relation between the current challenges and emergent technologies and present some opportunities and directions for future research work.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3390/s22155836

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The present methods for time-slotted packet scheduling, frequently used in IIoT systems to achieve appropriate Quality of Service (QoS), are hampered by network overhead and scalability issues.

    “The present methods for time-slotted packet scheduling, which are frequently used in IIoT systems to achieve the appropriate Quality of Service (QoS), are hampered by network overhead and scalability issues [37].”

    From A Critical Overview of Industrial Internet of Things Security and Privacy Issues Using a Layer-Based Hacking Scenario (2023) · cites this paper as [37]

    Section 3.3 discusses QoS-based communication and scalability in IIoT architectures, but does not address time-slotted packet scheduling or attribute network overhead and scalability problems to those methods. Searches for time-slotted scheduling, packet scheduling, and network overhead found no passage establishing the claim. (LLM, conf=0.74)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 101 · Cited by 119

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [38]Wang Y. Towara T. Anderl R. Topological Approach for Mapping Technologies in Reference Architectural Model Industrie 4.0 (RAMI 4.0) Proceedings of the World Congress on Engineering and Computer Science San Francisco, CA, USA 25–27 October 2017

Authors
Mirani, A. A., Velasco-Hernandez, G., Awasthi, A., & Walsh, J.
Affiliations
  • Munster Technological University (IE)
  • University of Limerick (IE)
Corresponding author
  • Mirani, Akseer Ali
  • Velasco-Hernandez, Gustavo
Venue
Sensors
Publisher
MDPI AG
Published
2022-08-04
Volume
22
Issue
15
Pages
5836
ISSN
1424-8220 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4289941885
Cited by
119
References
101
Citations by year
2026: 23 · 2025: 32 · 2024: 31 · 2023: 27 · 2022: 6
FWCI
2.16
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Sensors (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Preprints.org (acceptedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
  • University of Limerick Institutional Repository (University of Limerick) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
  • University of Limerick Institutional Repository (University of Limerick)
Funders
  • Science Foundation Ireland (16/RC/3918, 13/RC/2094_P2, 754489)
  • European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme (16/RC/3918, 13/RC/2094_P2, 754489)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering › Digital Transformation in Industry
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Networks and Communications › IoT and Edge/Fog Computing
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Advanced Data and IoT Technologies
Keywords
Industrial Internet of Things, IIoT architecture, reference architecture, scalability, interoperability, security (computing), privacy, reliability, low latency, edge computing, fog computing, blockchain, software-defined networking, 5G, machine learning, wireless sensor networks, industrial process monitoring
MeSH terms
Internet of Things, Blockchain, Reproducibility of Results, Computer Security, Privacy

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review