Cited by 10AI in cancer detectionMedical Image Segmentation TechniquesAdvanced Neural Network Applications

Using Sparse Patch Annotation for Tumor Segmentation in Histopathological Images

Open access
Liu, Yiqing, He, Qiming, Duan, Hufei, Shi, Huijuan, Han, Anjia, He, Yonghong·2022·Sensors

Abstract

Tumor segmentation is a fundamental task in histopathological image analysis. Creating accurate pixel-wise annotations for such segmentation tasks in a fully-supervised training framework requires significant effort. To reduce the burden of manual annotation, we propose a novel weakly supervised segmentation framework based on sparse patch annotation, i.e., only small portions of patches in an image are labeled as ‘tumor’ or ‘normal’. The framework consists of a patch-wise segmentation model called PSeger, and an innovative semi-supervised algorithm. PSeger has two branches for patch classification and image classification, respectively. This two-branch structure enables the model to learn more general features and thus reduce the risk of overfitting when learning sparsely annotated data. We incorporate the idea of consistency learning and self-training into the semi-supervised training strategy to take advantage of the unlabeled images. Trained on the BCSS dataset with only 25% of the images labeled (five patches for each labeled image), our proposed method achieved competitive performance compared to the fully supervised pixel-wise segmentation models. Experiments demonstrate that the proposed solution has the potential to reduce the burden of labeling histopathological images.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3390/s22166053

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Region-of-interest (ROI)-level annotations remain essential for localization and segmentation tasks, including tumor boundary identification and mitotic figure detection.

    “In contrast, region-of-interest (ROI)-level annotations remain essential for localization and segmentation tasks, including tumor boundary identification and mitotic figure detection [46,47].”

    From Artificial Intelligence in Dermatopathology: An Update and Review of the Current Literature (2026) · cites this paper as [46]

    The Introduction and Related Works explain that image-level labels lack tumor-location information and that more spatially informative annotations help tumor segmentation. The Conclusions, however, report comparable segmentation using sparse patch labels rather than carefully delineated boundaries. The paper does not address mitotic figure detection, so it does not support that example or the unqualified claim that ROI-level annotations remain essential. (LLM, conf=0.85)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 54 · Cited by 10

Research works printed but not linked: 9

  1. [8]Wang D. Khosla A. Gargeya R. Irshad H. Beck A.H. Deep learning for identifying metastatic breast cancer arXiv 2016 1606.05718
  2. [12]Liu Y. Gadepalli K. Norouzi M. Dahl G.E. Kohlberger T. Boyko A. Venugopalan S. Timofeev A. Nelson P.Q. Corrado G.S. Detecting cancer metastases on gigapixel pathology images arXiv 2017 1703.02442
  3. [14]Li Z. Tao R. Wu Q. Li B. Da-refinenet: A dual input whole slide image segmentation algorithm based on attention arXiv 2019 1907.06358
  4. [20]Dosovitskiy A. Beyer L. Kolesnikov A. Weissenborn D. Zhai X. Unterthiner T. Dehghani M. Minderer M. Heigold G. Gelly S. An image is worth 16x16 words: Transformers for image recognition at scale arXiv 2020 2010.11929
  5. [23]Yalniz I.Z. Jégou H. Chen K. Paluri M. Mahajan D. Billion-scale semi-supervised learning for image classification arXiv 2019 1905.00546
  6. [44]Vaswani A. Shazeer N. Parmar N. Uszkoreit J. Jones L. Gomez A.N. Kaiser Ł. Polosukhin I. Attention is all you need Proceedings of the Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems Long Beach, CA, USA 4–9 December 2017 6000 6010
  7. [46]Laine S. Aila T. Temporal ensembling for semi-supervised learning arXiv 2016 1610.02242
  8. [49]Loshchilov I. Hutter F. Decoupled weight decay regularization arXiv 2017 1711.05101
  9. [52]He K. Zhang X. Ren S. Sun J. Deep residual learning for image recognition Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition Las Vegas, NV, USA 26 June–1 July 2016 770 778

Authors
Liu, Y., He, Q., Duan, H., Shi, H., Han, A., & He, Y.
Affiliations
  • Tsinghua Shenzhen International Graduate School (CN)
  • Sun Yat-sen University (CN)
Corresponding author
  • Han, Anjia
  • He, Yonghong
Venue
Sensors
Publisher
MDPI AG
Published
2022-08-13
Volume
22
Issue
16
Pages
6053
ISSN
1424-8220 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4291825057
Cited by
10
References
54
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 5
FWCI
0.66
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Sensors (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
  • National Science Foundation of China (61875102, JCYJ20180508152528735, HW2018007, 2020Z99CFZ023)
  • Science and Technology Research Program of Shenzhen City (61875102, JCYJ20180508152528735, HW2018007, 2020Z99CFZ023)
  • Tsinghua University (61875102, JCYJ20180508152528735, HW2018007, 2020Z99CFZ023)
  • singhua University Spring Breeze Fund (61875102, JCYJ20180508152528735, HW2018007, 2020Z99CFZ023)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › AI in cancer detection
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Medical Image Segmentation Techniques
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Advanced Neural Network Applications
Keywords
tumor segmentation, histopathological images, weakly supervised segmentation, semi-supervised learning, consistency learning, self-training, dual-branch network, annotation burden reduction
MeSH terms
Supervised Machine Learning, Algorithms, Humans, Image Processing, Computer-Assisted, Neoplasms

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review