Cross-Layer Security for 5G/6G Network Slices: An SDN, NFV, and AI-Based Hybrid Framework
Open accessAbstract
Within the dynamic landscape of fifth-generation (5G) and emerging sixth-generation (6G) wireless networks, the adoption of network slicing has revolutionized telecommunications by enabling flexible and efficient resource allocation. However, this advancement introduces new security challenges, as traditional protection mechanisms struggle to address the dynamic and complex nature of sliced network environments. This study proposes a Hybrid Security Framework Using Cross-Layer Integration, combining Software-Defined Networking (SDN), Network Function Virtualization (NFV), and AI-driven anomaly detection to strengthen network defenses. By integrating security mechanisms across multiple layers, the framework effectively mitigates threats, ensuring the integrity and confidentiality of network slices. An implementation was developed, focusing on the AI-based detection process using a representative 5G security dataset. The results demonstrate promising detection accuracy and real-time response capabilities. While full SDN/NFV integration remains under development, these findings lay the groundwork for scalable, intelligent security architectures tailored to the evolving needs of next-generation networks.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The 5G/6G transition compounds IoT security by introducing network slicing whose isolation guarantees become targets of slice-hopping attacks.
“The 5G/6G transition compounds the problem by introducing network slicing-logical partitions whose isolation guarantees become themselves the target of slice-hopping attacks”
From Agentic AI and Large Language Models for Autonomous IoT Cybersecurity: A Systematic Survey, Taxonomy, and Research Roadmap (2026) · cites this paper as [38]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
Redefining 6G Network Slicing: AI-Driven Solutions for Future Use Cases
Botez, R., Zinca, D., & Dobrota, V. (2025) · Electronics · doi:10.3390/electronics14020368 · Cited by 29 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 27
- [1]Abood M.S. Wang H. Virdee B.S. He D. Fathy M. Yusuf A.A. Jamal O. Elwi T.A. Alibakhshikenari M. Kouhalvandi L. Improved 5G Network Slicing for Enhanced QoS against Attack in SDN Environment Using Deep Learning IET Commun. 2024 18 759 777 10.1049/cmu2.12735 · DOI
- [2]Kaur N. Kshetri N. Pandey P.S. Harnessing Artificial Intelligence for 6G Network Security: Impacts and Challenges arXiv 2024 10.48550/arXiv.2404.08643 2404.08643 · DOI
- [3]Rahouti M. Xiong X. Xin Y. Jagatheesaperumal S.K. Ayyash M. Shaheed M. SDN Security Review: Threat Taxonomy, Implications, and Open Challenges IEEE Access 2022 10 45820 45854 10.1109/ACCESS.2022.3168972 · DOI
- [4]Singh V.P. Singh M. Hedge S. Gupta M. Security in 5G Network Slices: Concerns and Opportunities IEEE Access 2024 12 52727 52743 10.1109/ACCESS.2024.3386632 · DOI
- [5]Cunha J. Ferreira P. Castro E.M. Oliveira P.C. Nicolau M.J. Núñez I. Sousa X.R. Serôdio C. Enhancing Network Slicing Security: Machine Learning, Software-Defined Networking, and Network Functions Virtualization-Driven Strategies Future Internet 2024 16 226 10.3390/fi16070226 · DOI
- [6]Ordonez-Lucena J. Ameigerias P. Lopez D. Ramos-Munoz J.J. Lorca J. Folgueira J. Network Slicing for 5G with SDN/NFV: Concepts, Architectures, and Challenges IEEE Commun. 2017 55 80 87 10.1109/MCOM.2017.1600935 · DOI · Paper page
- [7]Sheibani M. Konur S. Awan I. Qureshi A. A Multi-Layered Defence Strategy against DDoS Attacks in SDN/NFV-Based 5G Mobile Networks Electronics 2024 13 1515 10.3390/electronics13081515 · DOI
- [9]Wu W. Zhou C. Li M. Wu H. Zhou H. Zhang N. Shen X. Zhuang W. AI-Native Network Slicing for 6G Networks IEEE Wirel. Commun. 2021 29 96 103 10.1109/MWC.001.2100338 · DOI
- [10]Li Q. Wu G. Papathanassiou A. Mukherjee U. An end-to-end network slicing framework for 5G wireless communication systems arXiv 2017 10.48550/arXiv.1608.00572 1608.00572 · DOI
- [11]Olimid R.F. Nencioni G. 5G Network Slicing: A Security Overview IEEE Access 2020 8 99999 100009 10.1109/ACCESS.2020.2997702 · DOI
- [13]Rana D.S. Dhondiyal S.A. Software Defined Networking (SDN) Challenges, issues and Solution Int. Comput. Sci. Eng. 2019 7 884 889 10.26438/ijcse/v7i1.884889 · DOI
- [14]Ahmad S. Mir A.H. SDN Interfaces: Protocols, Taxonomy and Challenges Int Microw. Wirel. 2022 12 11 32 10.5815/ijwmt.2022.02.02 · DOI
- [15]Alnaim A.K. Securing 5G virtual networks: A critical analysis of SDN, NFV, and network slicing security Int. Inf. Secur. 2024 23 3569 3589 10.1007/s10207-024-00900-5 · DOI
- [16]Zhang T. NFV Platform Design: A Survey arXiv 2020 10.48550/arXiv.2002.11059 2002.11059 · DOI
- [17]Gao S. Lin R. Fu Y. Li H. Cao J. Security Threats, requirements and Recommendations on Creating 5G Network Slicing System: A Survey Electronics 2024 13 1860 10.3390/electronics13101860 · DOI
- [18]Thantharate A. Paropkari R. Kankariya P. Thimmapuram M. Secure5G: A Deep Learning Framework Towards a Secure Network Slicing in 5G and Beyond Proceedings of the 10th Annual Computing and Communication Workshop and Conference (CCWC) Las Vegas, NV, USA 6–8 January 2020 0852 0857
- [19]Salahdine F. Han T. Zhang N. Security in 5G and beyond recent advances and future challenges Secur. Priv. 2023 6 e271 10.1002/spy2.271 · DOI
- [20]Alwis D.C. Porambage P. Dev K. Gadekallu T.R. Liyanage M. A Survey on Network Slicing Security: Attacks, Challenges, Solutions and Research Directions IEEE Commun. Surv. Tutor. 2024 26 534 570 10.1109/COMST.2023.3312349 · DOI
- [22]Ramezanpour K. Jangannath J. Jangannath A. Security and privacy vulnerabilities of 5G/6G and WiFi 6: Survey and research directions from a coexistence perspective Comput. Netw. 2023 221 109515 10.1016/j.comnet.2022.109515 · DOI
- [23]Suomalainen J. Juhola A. Shahabuddin S. Mammela A. Ahmad I. Machine Learning Threatens 5G Security IEEE Access 2020 8 190822 190842 10.1109/ACCESS.2020.3031966 · DOI
- [24]Kaur J. Khan M.A. Iftikhar M. Imran M. Haq E. Machine Learning Techniques for 5G and Beyond IEEE Access 2021 9 23472 23488 10.1109/ACCESS.2021.3051557 · DOI
- [25]Fakhouri H.N. Alawadi S. Awaysheh F.M. Hani I.B. Alkhalaileh M. Hamad F. A Comprehensive Study on the Role of Machine Learning in 5G Security: Challenges, Technologies, and Solutions Electronics 2023 22 4604 10.3390/electronics12224604 · DOI
- [26]Wang W. Liang C. Chen Q. Tang L. Yanikomergolu H. Liu T. Distributed Online Anomaly Detection for Virtualized Network Slicing Environment IEEE Technol. Veh. Technol. 2022 71 12235 12249 10.1109/TVT.2022.3193074 · DOI
- [27]Alnaim A.K. Alwakeel A.M. Fernandez E.B. Towards a Security Reference Architecture for NFV Sensors 2022 22 3750 10.3390/s22103750 35632161 PMC9146665 · DOI
- [28]Ramadhan A.J. TT-S3RA: Traffic-Aware Scheduling for Secure Slicing and Resource Allocation in SDN/NFVEnabled 5G Networks Int. J. Eng. Trends Technol. 2021 69 215 232 10.14445/22315381/IJETT-V69I7P229 · DOI
- [29]Khan S. Khan S. Ali Y. Khalid M. Ullah Z. Mumtaz S. Highly Accurate and Reliable Wireless Network Slicing in 5th Generation Networks: A Hybrid Deep Learning Approach arXiv 2021 2111.09416 10.1007/s10922-021-09636-2 · DOI
- [30]Mahyoub M. AbdulGhaffar A. Alalade E. Matrawy A. A Security-aware Network Function Sharing Model for 5G Slicing arXiv 2023 2303.03492 10.1002/spy2.70039 · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Nageshwaran, V., & Ezekiel, S. (2026) · Electronics · doi:10.3390/electronics15122740 · Cited by 4 · see citing works
“The 5G/6G transition compounds the problem by introducing network slicing—logical partitions whose isolation guarantees become themselves the target of slice-hopping attacks [38,39,48,49].”
- Authors
- Allaw, Z., Zein, O., & Ahmad, A.-M.
- Affiliations
- Lebanese International University (LB)
- Corresponding author
- Allaw, Zeina
- Zein, Ola
- Venue
- Sensors
- Publisher
- MDPI AG
- Published
- 2025-05-26
- Volume
- 25
- Issue
- 11
- Pages
- 3335
- ISSN
- 1424-8220 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC12157302
- OpenAlex
- W4410766892
- Cited by
- 29
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 24 · 2025: 5
- FWCI
- 12.17
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Sensors (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- Funders
- Lebanese International University
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Networks and Communications › Software-Defined Networks and 5G
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Networks and Communications › Network Security and Intrusion Detection
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Networks and Communications › Cybersecurity and Information Systems
- Keywords
- cross-layer security, network slicing, 5G, 6G, software-defined networking, network function virtualization, AI-driven anomaly detection, network security, hybrid security framework, real-time threat detection
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review