Mitigating Transmission Errors: A Forward Error Correction-Based Framework for Enhancing Objective Video Quality
Open accessAbstract
In video transmission, maintaining high visual quality under variable network conditions, including bandwidth and efficiency, is essential for optimal viewer experience. Channel errors or malicious attacks during transmission can cause degradation in video quality, affecting its secure transmission and putting its confidentiality and integrity at risk. This paper presents a novel approach to enhancing objective video quality by integrating an energy-efficient forward error correction (FEC) technique into video encoding and transmission processes. Moreover, it ensures that the video contents remain secure and unintelligible to unauthorized parties. This is achieved by combining H.264/AVC syntax-based encryption and decryption algorithms with error correction during the video coding process to provide end-to-end confidentiality. Unlike traditional error correction strategies, our approach dynamically adjusts redundancy levels based on real-time network conditions, optimizing bandwidth utilization without compromising quality. The proposed framework is evaluated across full reference objective video quality metrics, demonstrating significant improvements in the peak signal-to-noise ratio (PSNR) and PSNR611 of the recovered videos. Experiments are carried out on multiple test video sequences with different video resolutions having various characteristics, i.e., colors, motions, and structures, and confirm that the FEC-based solution effectively detects and corrects packet loss and transmission errors without the need for retransmission, reducing the impact of channel noise and accidental disruptions on visual quality in challenging network environments. This study contributes to the development of resilient video transmission systems with reduced computational complexity of the codec and provides insights into the role of FEC in addressing quality degradation in modern multimedia applications where low latency is crucial.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
Sensitivity of wireless network simulations to a two-state markov model channel approximation
McDougall, J., & Miller, S. (2004) · GLOBECOM '03. IEEE Global Telecommunications Conference (IEEE Cat. No.03CH37489) · doi:10.1109/glocom.2003.1258328 · Cited by 70 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
- Authors
- Imtiaz, M. B., & Kamran, R.
- Affiliations
- Technological University of the Shannon: Midlands Midwest (IE)
- Islamia University of Bahawalpur (PK)
- Corresponding author
- Imtiaz, Muhammad Babar
- Venue
- Sensors
- Publisher
- MDPI AG
- Published
- 2025-06-01
- Volume
- 25
- Issue
- 11
- Pages
- 3503
- ISSN
- 1424-8220 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC12158371
- OpenAlex
- W4410957123
- Cited by
- 4
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 4
- FWCI
- 1.86
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Sensors (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Signal Processing › Video Coding and Compression Technologies
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Image and Video Quality Assessment
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Advanced Data Compression Techniques
- Keywords
- forward error correction, video transmission, packet loss, spectral efficiency, network resilience, video security, PSNR
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review