Governing Healthcare AI in the Real World: How Fairness, Transparency, and Human Oversight Can Coexist: A Narrative Review
Open accessAbstract
Artificial intelligence (AI) is rapidly shifting from experimental pilots to mainstream clinical infrastructure, redefining how evidence, accountability, and ethics intersect in healthcare. This narrative review integrates insights from peer-reviewed studies and policy frameworks to examine seven cross-cutting aspects: bias and fairness, explainability, safety and quality, privacy and data protection, accountability and liability, human oversight, and procurement and deployment. Findings reveal persistent inequities driven by dataset bias and opaque design; the need for explainability tools that are validated, task-specific, and usable by clinicians; and the centrality of post-market surveillance for sustaining patient safety. Privacy-preserving methods such as federated learning and differential privacy show promise but demand rigorous validation and regulatory coherence. Emerging liability models advocate shared enterprise responsibility, while governance-by-design—embedding transparency, auditability, and equity across the AI lifecycle—appears most effective in balancing innovation with public trust. Ethical, legal, and technical safeguards must evolve together to ensure that AI augments, rather than replaces, clinical judgment and institutional accountability.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The underlying evidence for the socio-technical framing of robustness was heterogeneous and often more conceptual or methodological than operational.
“although the underlying evidence was heterogeneous and often more conceptual or methodological than operational [6,19,29,31,32,37,45,46].”
From Beyond Model Development in Healthcare AI: Post-Development Robustness, Post-Deployment Monitoring, and Lifecycle Governance—A Scoping Review of Reviews (2026) · cites this paper as [29]
The Introduction describes the evidence base as “heterogeneous by design,” spanning implementation research, bioethics, law, regulatory guidance, and governance. The Discussion calls the review concept-driven, and Safety and Quality identifies methodological contributions. The paper does not establish that the evidence was often more conceptual or methodological than operational. (LLM, conf=0.82)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredMuch of the review literature addressed governance architectures, robustness concepts, implementation barriers, monitoring frameworks, MLOps, or deployment-proximal evaluation, rather than mature evidence generated during sustained routine deployment.
“Much of the review literature instead addressed governance architectures, robustness concepts, implementation barriers, monitoring frameworks, MLOps, or deployment-proximal evaluation, rather than mature evidence generated during sustained routine deployment [18,19,20,29,35,37,47,49].”
From Beyond Model Development in Healthcare AI: Post-Development Robustness, Post-Deployment Monitoring, and Lifecycle Governance—A Scoping Review of Reviews (2026) · cites this paper as [29]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 117 · Cited by 22
Research works printed but not linked: 72
- Topol, E.J. High-performance medicine: The convergence of human and artificial intelligence. Nat. Med. 2019, 25, 44-56. [CrossRef] · DOI · Paper page
- Busch, F.; Kather, J.N.; Johner, C.; Moser, M.; Truhn, D.; Adams, L.C.; Bressem, K.K. Navigating the European Union Artificial Intelligence Act for healthcare. npj Digit. Med. 2024, 7, 210. [CrossRef] [PubMed] · DOI
- Ministry of Food and Drug Safety (MFDS). Guidance on the Review and Approval of Artificial Intelligence (AI)-Based Medical Devices. 20 July 2023. Available online: https://www.mfds.go.kr/eng/brd/m_40/view.do?seq=72627 (accessed on 14 January 2026).
- Ning, Y.; Teixayavong, S.; Shang, Y.; Savulescu, J.; Nagaraj, V.; Miao, D.; Mertens, M.; Ting, D.S.W.; Ong, J.C.L.; Liu, M.; et al. Generative artificial intelligence and ethical considerations in health care: A scoping review and ethics checklist. Lancet Digit. Health 2024, 6, e848-e856. [CrossRef] [PubMed] · DOI · Paper page
- Du, J.; Tao, X.; Zhu, L.; Wang, H.; Qi, W.; Min, X.; Wei, S.; Zhang, X.; Liu, Q.; Du, Q. Development of a visualized risk prediction system for sarcopenia in older adults using machine learning: A cohort study based on CHARLS. Front. Public Health 2025, 13, 1544894. [CrossRef] · DOI
- Weissman, G.E. Evaluation and regulation of artificial intelligence medical devices. Annu. Rev. Biomed. Data Sci. 2025, 8, 81-99. [CrossRef] · DOI
- Maliha, G.; Gerke, S.; Cohen, I.G.; Parikh, R.B. Artificial intelligence and liability in medicine: Balancing safety and innovation. Milbank Q. 2021, 99, 629-647. [CrossRef] · DOI
- Pham, T. Ethical and legal considerations in healthcare AI: Innovation and policy for safe and fair use. R. Soc. Open Sci. 2025, 12, 241873. [CrossRef] · DOI
- Mahamadou, A.J.D.; Trotsyuk, A.A. Revisiting technical bias mitigation strategies. Annu. Rev. Biomed. Data Sci. 2025, 8, 287-303. [CrossRef] · DOI
- Hanna, M.G.; Pantanowitz, L.; Jackson, B.; Palmer, O.; Visweswaran, S.; Pantanowitz, J.; Deebajah, M.; Rashidi, H.H. Ethical and bias considerations in artificial intelligence/machine learning. Mod. Pathol. 2025, 38, 100686. [CrossRef] · DOI · Paper page
- Dehghani, F.; Paiva, P.; Malik, N.; Lin, J.; Bayat, S.; Bento, M. Accuracy-fairness trade-off in ML for healthcare: A quantitative evaluation of bias mitigation strategies. Inf. Softw. Technol. 2025, 188, 107896. [CrossRef] · DOI
- Stanley, E.A.M.; Wilms, M.; Forkert, N.D. Disproportionate subgroup impacts and other challenges of fairness in artificial intelligence for medical image analysis. In Ethical and Philosophical Issues in Medical Imaging, Multimodal Learning and Fusion Across Scales for Clinical Decision Support, and Topological Data Analysis for Biomedical Imaging; Lecture Notes in Computer Science; Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2022; Volume 13755, pp. 14-25.
- Vogt, Y. Disability and algorithmic fairness in healthcare: A narrative review. J. Med. Artif. Intell. 2025, 8, 56. [CrossRef] https://doi.org/10.3390/sci8020036
- Liu, M.; Ning, Y.; Teixayavong, S.; Mertens, M.; Xu, J.; Ting, D.S.W.; Cheng, L.T.-E.; Ong, J.C.L.; Teo, Z.L.; Tan, T.F.; et al. A translational perspective towards clinical AI fairness. npj Digit. Med. 2023, 6, 172. [CrossRef] · DOI · Paper page
- Long, Y.; Novak, L.; Walsh, C.G. Searching for value-sensitive design in applied health AI: A narrative review. Yearb. Med. Inform. 2024, 33, 75-82. [CrossRef] [PubMed] · DOI
- Ferrara, E. Fairness and bias in artificial intelligence: A brief survey of sources, impacts, and mitigation strategies. Sci 2024, 6, 3. [CrossRef] · DOI · Paper page
- Radanliev, P. AI ethics: Integrating transparency, fairness, and privacy in AI development. Appl. Artif. Intell. 2025, 39, 2463722. [CrossRef] · DOI
- Kale, A.U.; Hogg, H.D.J.; Pearson, R.; Glocker, B.; Golder, S.; Coombe, A.; Coombe, A.; Waring, J.; Liu, X.; Moore, D.J.; et al. Detecting algorithmic errors and patient harms for AI-enabled medical devices in randomized trials: Protocol. JMIR Res. Protoc. 2024, 13, e55707. [CrossRef] [PubMed] · DOI
- Kumar, A.; Aelgani, V.; Vohra, R.; Gupta, S.K.; Bhagawati, M.; Paul, S.; Saba, L.; Suri, N.; Khanna, N.N.; Laird, J.R.; et al. Artificial intelligence bias in medical system designs: A systematic review. Multimed. Tools Appl. 2024, 83, 18005-18057. [CrossRef] · DOI · Paper page
- Rajkomar, A.; Hardt, M.; Howell, M.D.; Corrado, G.; Chin, M.H. Ensuring fairness in machine learning to advance health equity. Ann. Intern. Med. 2018, 169, 866-872. [CrossRef] · DOI · Paper page
- Griffin, A.C.; Wang, K.H.; Leung, T.I.; Facelli, J.C. Recommendations to promote fairness and inclusion in biomedical AI. J. Biomed. Inform. 2024, 152, 104693. [CrossRef] · DOI
- Nazer, L.H.; Zatarah, R.; Waldrip, S.; Ke, J.X.C.; Moukheiber, M.; Khanna, A.K.; Hicklen, R.S.; Moukheiber, L.; Moukheiber, D.; Ma, H.; et al. Bias in artificial intelligence algorithms and recommendations for mitigation. PLoS Digit. Health 2023, 2, e0000278. [CrossRef] · DOI · Paper page
- van den Heuvel, J.; Porter, A.; Kirkpatrick, E.; Verjans, J.; Reddy, S.; Freckelton, I. The silent partner: A narrative review of AI's impact on informed consent. J. Law Med. 2025, 32, 74-84.
- Amann, J.; Blasimme, A.; Vayena, E.; Frey, D.; Madai, V.I. Explainability for artificial intelligence in healthcare: A multidisciplinary perspective. BMC Med. Inform. Decis. Mak. 2020, 20, 310. [CrossRef] · DOI · Paper page
- Park, S.H.; Kim, Y.-H.; Lee, J.Y.; Yoo, S.; Kim, C.J. Ethical challenges regarding artificial intelligence in medicine from the perspective of scientific editing and peer review. Sci. Ed. 2019, 6, 91-98. [CrossRef] · DOI
- Alkhanbouli, R.; Almadhaani, H.M.A.; Alhosani, F.; Simsekler, M.C.E. The role of explainable artificial intelligence in disease prediction: A systematic literature review and future research directions. BMC Med. Inform. Decis. Mak. 2025, 25, 110. [CrossRef] · DOI
- Ali, S.; Akhlaq, F.; Imran, A.S.; Kastrati, Z.; Daudpota, S.M.; Moosa, M. The enlightening role of explainable artificial intelligence in medical and healthcare domains: A systematic literature review. Comput. Biol. Med. 2023, 166, 107555. [CrossRef] [PubMed] · DOI
- Kapcia, M.; Eshkiki, H.; Duell, J.; Fan, X.; Zhou, S.; Mora, B. ExMed: An AI tool for experimenting explainable techniques on medical data analytics. In Proceedings of the 2021 IEEE 33rd International Conference on Tools with Artificial Intelligence (ICTAI), Virtual, 1-3 November 2021; pp. 841-845.
- Falvo, F.R.; Cannataro, M. Explainability techniques for artificial intelligence models in medical diagnostic. In Proceedings of the 2024 IEEE International Conference on Bioinformatics and Biomedicine (BIBM), Lisbon, Portugal, 3-6 December 2024; pp. 6907-6913.
- Phillips, V. A counterintuitive approach to explainable AI in healthcare: Balancing transparency, efficiency, and cost. AI Soc. 2025, 40, 5735-5741. [CrossRef] · DOI
- Rudin, C. Stop explaining black-box machine learning models for high-stakes decisions and use interpretable models instead. Nat. Mach. Intell. 2019, 1, 206-215. [CrossRef] · DOI · Paper page
- McNamara, S.L.; Yi, P.H.; Lotter, W. The clinician-AI interface: Intended use and explainability in FDA-cleared AI devices for medical image interpretation. npj Digit. Med. 2024, 7, 80. [CrossRef] · DOI · Paper page
- Wenderott, K.; Krups, J.; Zaruchas, F.; Weigl, M. Effects of artificial intelligence implementation on efficiency in medical imaging: A systematic literature review and meta-analysis. npj Digit. Med. 2024, 7, 265. [CrossRef] · DOI
- Doumard, E.; Aligon, J.; Escriva, E.; Excoffier, J.-B.; Monsarrat, P.; Soulé-Dupuy, C. A quantitative approach for the comparison of additive local explanation methods. Inf. Syst. 2023, 114, 102254. [CrossRef] · DOI
- Loh, H.W.; Ooi, C.P.; Seoni, S.; Barua, P.D.; Molinari, F.; Acharya, U.R. Application of explainable artificial intelligence for healthcare: A systematic review of the last decade (2011-2022). Int. J. Med. Inform. 2022, 157, 104222. [CrossRef] [PubMed] · DOI · Paper page
- Mandava, R.; Vellela, S.S.; Malathi, N.; Haritha, K.; Gorintla, S.; Dalavai, L. Exploring the Role of XAI in Enhancing Predictive Model Transparency in Healthcare Risk Assessment 2025. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Computational Robotics, Testing and Engineering Evaluation (ICCRTEE), Virudhunagar, India, 28-30 May 2025; pp. 1-5. [CrossRef] · DOI
- Kumar, A., Ananth Kumar, T., Das, P., Sharma, C., Dubey, A.K., Eds.; Wiley-Scrivener: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2025; pp. 307-323. Available online: https://www.wiley.com/en-us/Explainable+Artificial+Intelligence+in+the+Healthcare+Industry- p-9781394249268 (accessed on 14 January 2026).
- Blahodelskyi, O. Systematic review: Innovative approaches in artificial intelligence development. Nigerian J. Technol. 2025, 43, 839-848. [CrossRef] · DOI
- Aldhafeeri, F.M. Governing artificial intelligence in radiology: A systematic review of ethical, legal, and regulatory frameworks. Diagnostics 2025, 15, 2300. [CrossRef] [PubMed] · DOI
- Nawawi, M.H.M.; Ishak, M.S.; Raes, R.F.A.; Razak, I.A.; Hasan, S.; Rahim, A.I.A. The intersection of quality improvement, artificial intelligence and patient safety in healthcare-Current applications, challenges and risks, and future directions: A scoping review. J. Med. Artif. Intell. 2025, 8, 57. [CrossRef] · DOI
- Doolan, P.; Michopoulou, S.; Meades, R. IPEM topical report: Results of a 2024 UK survey of artificial intelligence in medical physics and clinical engineering. Phys. Med. Biol. 2025, 70, 14TR01. [CrossRef] · DOI
- Hodges, B.D. Education and the adoption of AI in healthcare: "What is happening?". Healthc. Pap. 2025, 22, 39-43. [CrossRef] · DOI
- Zhang, Y.; Li, J.; Meng, X.; Li, S.; Wang, H. Interpretation of sectoral standard AI medical device-Specific requirement for datasets: Color fundus images of diabetic retinopathy. Med. J. Peking Union Med. Coll. Hosp. 2025, 16, 916-924. [CrossRef] · DOI
- Gornet, M.; Maxwell, W. The European approach to regulating AI through technical standards. Internet Policy Rev. 2024, 13, 1-27. [CrossRef] · DOI
- Reddy, S. Global harmonization of AI-enabled software as a medical device regulation: Addressing challenges and unifying standards. Mayo Clin. Proc. Digit. Health 2024, 3, 100191. [CrossRef] · DOI
- Chauhan, S.B.; Gaur, R.; Akram, A.; Singh, I. Artificial intelligence-driven insights for regulatory intelligence in medical devices: Evaluating EMA, FDA, and CDSCO frameworks. Glob. Clin. Eng. J. 2025, 7, 11-24. [CrossRef] · DOI
- Vardas, E.P.; Marketou, M.; Vardas, P.E. Medicine, healthcare and the AI Act: Gaps, challenges and future implications. Eur. Heart J. Digit. Health 2025, 6, 833-839. [CrossRef] · DOI · Paper page
- Duffourc, M.N.; Gerke, S. The proposed EU directives for AI liability leave worrying gaps likely to impact medical AI. npj Digit. Med. 2023, 6, 77. [CrossRef] · DOI
- Lyell, D.; Wang, Y.; Coiera, E.; Magrabi, F. More than algorithms: Analysis of safety events involving ML-enabled medical devices reported to the FDA. J. Am. Med. Inform. Assoc. 2023, 30, 1227-1236. [PubMed]
- Handley, J.L.; Krevat, S.A.; Fong, A.; Ratwani, R.M. Artificial intelligence-related safety issues associated with ML-enabled medical devices: An analysis of MAUDE reports. npj Digit. Med. 2024, 7, 351. [PubMed]
- Abrisqueta-Costa, P.; García-Marco, J.A.; Gutiérrez, A.; Hernández-Rivas, J.Á.; Andreu-Lapiedra, R.; Arguello-Tomas, M.; Leiva- Farré, C.; López-Roda, M.D.; Callejo-Mellén, Á.; Álvarez-García, E.; et al. Real-world evidence on adverse events and healthcare resource utilization in patients with chronic lymphocytic leukaemia in Spain using natural language processing: The SRealCLL study. Cancers 2024, 16, 4004. [PubMed]
- Stogiannos, N.; Cuocolo, R.; D'Antonoli, A.T.; dos Santos, D.P.; Harvey, H.; Huisman, M.; Kocak, B.; Kotter, E.; Lekadir, K.; Shelmerdine, S.C.; et al. Recognising errors in AI implementation in radiology: A narrative review. Eur. J. Radiol. 2025, 191, 112311. [CrossRef] · DOI
- Federico, C.A.; Trotsyuk, A.A. Biomedical data science, artificial intelligence, and ethics: Navigating challenges in the face of explosive growth. Annu. Rev. Biomed. Data Sci. 2024, 7, 1-14. [CrossRef] [PubMed] · DOI
- Williamson, S.M.; Prybutok, V. Balancing privacy and progress: A review of privacy challenges, systemic oversight, and patient perceptions in AI-driven healthcare. Appl. Sci. 2024, 14, 675. [CrossRef] · DOI · Paper page
- Amini, M.M.; Jesus, M.; Sheikholeslami, D.F.; Alves, P.; Benam, A.H.; Hariri, F. Artificial intelligence ethics and challenges in healthcare applications: A comprehensive review in the context of the European GDPR mandate. Mach. Learn. Knowl. Extr. 2023, 5, 1023-1035. [CrossRef] · DOI
- Meszaros, J.; Minari, J.; Huys, I. The future regulation of artificial intelligence systems in healthcare services and medical research in the European Union. Front. Genet. 2022, 13, 927721. [CrossRef] · DOI
- Wang, Y.; Liu, C.; Zhou, K.; Zhu, T.; Han, X. Towards regulatory generative AI in ophthalmology healthcare: A security and privacy perspective. Br. J. Ophthalmol. 2024, 108, 1349-1353. [CrossRef] · DOI
- Wang, X.; Li, J.; Ding, X.; Zhang, H.; Sun, L. A survey of differential privacy techniques for federated learning. IEEE Access 2025, 13, 6539-6555. [CrossRef] · DOI
- Shukla, S.; Rajkumar, S.; Sinha, A.; Esha, M.; Elango, K.; Sampath, V. Federated learning with differential privacy for breast cancer diagnosis enabling secure data sharing and model integrity. Sci. Rep. 2025, 15, 12345. [CrossRef] · DOI
- Mahato, G.K.; Banerjee, A.; Chakraborty, S.K.; Gao, X.-Z. Privacy-preserving verifiable federated learning scheme using blockchain and homomorphic encryption. Appl. Soft Comput. 2024, 156, 111208. [CrossRef] 103. Li, K.; Lohachab, A.; Dumontier, M.; Urovi, V. Privacy preservation in blockchain-based healthcare data sharing: A systematic review. Peer-to-Peer Netw. Appl. 2025, 18, 302. [CrossRef] [PubMed] 104. · DOI
- Conduah, A.K.; Ofoe, S.; Siaw-Marfo, D. Data privacy in healthcare: Global challenges and solutions. Digit. Health 2025, 11, 20552076241234567. [CrossRef] 105. Alshohoumi, F. Privacy concerns of IoT medical applications: An empirical analysis of the current privacy policies under the GDPR. Int. J. Electron. Healthc. 2025, 15, 155-175. [CrossRef] 106. Puneeth, R.P.; Parthasarathy, G. Blockchain-based framework for privacy preservation and securing EHR with patient-centric access control. Acta Inform. Pragensia 2024, 13, 84195-84229. [CrossRef] 107 · DOI
- Chan, H.Y. A proportionality-by-design approach for mobile mental health and well-being applications. Law Innov. Technol. 2025, 17, 58-83. [CrossRef] 108. · DOI
- Sella, N.; Guinot, F.; Lagrange, N.; Albou, L.-P.; Desponds, J.; Isambert, H. Preserving information while respecting privacy through an information theoretic framework for synthetic health data generation. npj Digit. Med. 2025, 8, 49. [CrossRef] 113. Habli, I.; Lawton, T.; Porter, Z. Artificial intelligence in health care: Accountability and safety. Bull. World Health Organ. 2020, 98, 251-256. [CrossRef] [PubMed] 114. Chan, B. Applying a common enterprise theory of liability to clinical AI systems. Am. J. Law Med. 2021, 47, 351-385. [CrossRef] 115. Daye, D.; Wiggins, W.F.; Lungren, M.P.; Alkasab, T.; Kottler, N.; Allen, B.; Roth, C.J.; Bizzo, B.C.; Durniak, K.; Brink, J.A.; et al. Implementation of Clinical Artificial Intelligence in Radiology: Who Decides and How? Radiology 2022, 305, 555-563. [CrossRef] [PubMed] 116. · DOI
- Contaldo, M.T.; Pasceri, G.; Vignati, G.; Bracchi, L.; Triggiani, S.; Carrafiello, G. AI in radiology: Navigating medical responsibility. Diagnostics 2024, 14, 1506. [CrossRef] [PubMed] 119. Chan, G.K.Y. AI in healthcare: Regulatory guidelines and judge-made negligence principles for AI implementers. Med. Law Int. 2025. [CrossRef] 120. · DOI
- Warraich, H.J.; Tazbaz, T.; Califf, R.M. FDA perspective on the regulation of artificial intelligence in health care and biomedicine. JAMA 2025, 333, 241-247. [CrossRef] 129. · DOI · Paper page
- Labkoff, S.; Oladimeji, B.; Kannry, J.; Solomonides, A.; Leftwich, R.; Koski, E.; Joseph, A.L.; Lopez-Gonzalez, M.; Fleisher, L.A.; Nolen, K.; et al. Toward a responsible future: Recommendations for AI-enabled clinical decision support. J. Am. Med. Inform. Assoc. 2024, 31, 2730-2739. [CrossRef] 138. Bignami, E.G.; Russo, M.; Semeraro, F.; Bellini, V. The European Union AI Act in an era of global uncertainty. JMIR AI 2025, 4, e75527. [CrossRef] [PubMed] 139. NHS Digital. Artificial Intelligence (AI) Buyer's Guide Assessment Template. Available online: https://digital.nhs.uk/services/ai- knowledge-repository/develop-ai/a-buyers-guide-to-ai-in-health-and-care/assessment-template (accessed on 14 January 2026). 140. · DOI
- Bidenko, N.V.; Stuchynska, N.V.; Palamarchuk, Y.V.; Matviienko, M.M. Integrating artificial intelligence in healthcare practice: Challenges and future prospects. Wiad. Lek. 2025, 78, 1199-1205. [CrossRef] 142. Kim, J.Y.; Hasan, A.; Kellogg, K.C.; Ratliff, W.; Murray, S.G.; Suresh, H.; Valladares, A.; Shaw, K.; Tobey, D.; Vidal, D.E.; et al. Development and preliminary testing of Health Equity Across the AI Lifecycle (HEAAL): A framework for healthcare delivery organizations to mitigate the risk of AI solutions worsening health inequities. PLoS Digit. Health 2024, 3, e0000390. [CrossRef] 143. · DOI · Paper page
- Arnaout, A.; Gill, P.; Virani, A.; Flatt, A.; Prodan-Balla, N.; Byres, D.; Stowe, M.; Saremi, A.; Coss, M.; Tatto, M.; et al. Shaping the future of healthcare in British Columbia: Establishing provincial clinical governance for responsible deployment of artificial intelligence tools. Healthc. Manag. Forum 2024, 37, 320-328. [CrossRef] 144. Torkilsheyggi, A. Flexibility first, then standardize: A strategy for growing inter-departmental systems. Stud. Health Technol. Inform. 2015, 216, 477-481. 145. · DOI
- Lukkien, D.R.M.; Nap, H.H.; Peine, A.; Minkman, M.M.N.; Moors, E.H.M.; Boon, W.P.C. Responsible scaling of artificial intelligence in healthcare: Standardization meets customization. Ethics Inf. Technol. 2025, 27, 34. [CrossRef] 146. · DOI
- Vasey, B.; Nagendran, M.; Campbell, B.; Clifton, D.A.; Collins, G.S.; Denaxas, S.; Denniston, A.K.; Faes, L.; Geerts, B.; Ibrahim, M.; et al. Reporting guideline for the early-stage clinical evaluation of decision support systems driven by artificial intelligence: DECIDE-AI. BMJ 2022, 377, e070904. [CrossRef] [PubMed] 147. · DOI · Paper page
- Sakly, H.; Guetari, R.; Kraiem, N. Deployment and Continuous Integration of AI in Healthcare. In Scalable Artificial Intelligence for Healthcare: Advancing AI Solutions for Global Health Challenges; CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL, USA, 2025; pp. 95-112. 148.
- Brady, A.P.; Allen, B.; Chong, J.; Kotter, E.; Kottler, N.; Mongan, J.; Oakden-Rayner, L.; dos Santos, D.P.; Tang, A.; Wald, C.; et al. Developing, purchasing, implementing and monitoring AI tools in radiology: Practical considerations. A multi-society statement from the ACR, CAR, ESR, RANZCR & RSNA. J. Med. Imaging Radiat. Oncol. 2024, 68, 7-26. [CrossRef] 149. Rajendra, J.B.; Thuraisingam, A.S. The role of explainability and human intervention in AI decisions: Jurisdictional and regulatory aspects. Inf. Commun. Technol. Law 2025, 34, 1-32. [CrossRef] 150. Wang, Y.; Li, N.; Chen, L.; Wu, M.; Meng, S.; Dai, Z.; Zhang, Y.; Clarke, M. Guidelines, consensus statements, and standards for the use of artificial intelligence in medicine: Systematic review. J. Med. Internet Res. 2023, 25, e46089. [CrossRef] [PubMed] 151. · DOI
- Authors
- Bailo, P., Nittari, G., Pesel, G., Basello, E., Spasari, T., & Ricci, G.
- Affiliations
- Università di Camerino (IT)
- University of Trieste (IT)
- University Niccolò Cusano (IT)
- Corresponding author
- Ricci, Giovanna
- Venue
- Sci
- Publisher
- MDPI AG
- Published
- 2026-02-06
- Volume
- 8
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 36
- ISSN
- 2413-4155 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W7128166289
- Cited by
- 22
- References
- 117
- Citations by year
- 2026: 22
- FWCI
- 13.85
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Sci (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (acceptedVersion)
- Unicam Scientific Publications (University of Camerino) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Health Informatics › Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
- Social Sciences › Safety Research › Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI)
- Keywords
- algorithmic fairness, algorithmic bias, explainability, human oversight, privacy-preserving machine learning, federated learning, differential privacy, post-marketing surveillance, data bias, clinical implementation of AI, AI ethics, governance-by-design
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review