Cited by 103Team Dynamics and PerformanceKnowledge Management and SharingOrganizational Management and Innovation

Organizational Silos: A Scoping Review Informed by a Behavioral Perspective on Systems and Networks

Open access
Bento, Fabio, Tagliabue, Marco, Lorenzo, Flora·2020·Societies

Abstract

In recent years, several organizations have implemented interventions aimed at integrating work processes and bridging network clusters. These are often permeated by different assumptions regarding clusters in organizational settings. There are concerns about the formation of silos and structural barriers to communication across the formal and informal network structures. Conversely, network clusters are regarded as spaces of local social reinforcement from which innovation ideas may emerge. Although terminologically and functionally different, they share some common features insofar as organizational behavior is concerned and the production of artifacts that fulfill organizational goals. The present scoping review presents an analysis of the literature on organizational silos while investigating attempts to bridge network clusters. Based on the search results, 40 studies were included in the analysis of the findings; of these, 20 were empirical studies and were included in a further quantitative analysis of methods and findings. We identified patterns of definitions of silos and variation in terms of aims, variables, and methods used to evaluate interventions among the heterogeneous studies. Special attention was dedicated to the role of consequences of siloed organizational behavior. We conclude that silos comprise barriers to achieving organizational goals insofar as they pose a threat to internal cooperation.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3390/soc10030056

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • HEX's silo architecture hinders internal cooperation, affecting overall performance and adaptability.

    “Our findings, amongst other focal points, also suggest that HEX's silo architecture hinders internal cooperation, affecting overall performance and adaptability [31].”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 126

  1. Bannister, F. Dismantling the silos: Extracting new value from IT investments in public administration. Inf. Syst. J. 2001, 11, 65-84, doi:10.1046/j.1365-2575.2001.00094.x. · DOI
  2. Bates, A. Bridge the gap from strategy to execution: Culture change that sticks. Strateg. HR Rev. 2017, 16, 222-228, doi:10.1108/SHR-07-2017-0048. · DOI
  3. Bathurst, R.; Galloway, C. Invitational discourse: Towards a spirituality of communication. Soc. Responsib. J. 2018, 14, 336-350, doi:10.1108/SRJ-05-2016-0089. · DOI
  4. Briody, E.K.; Erickson, K.C. Success despite the silos: System-wide innovation and collaboration. Int. J. Bus. Anthropol. 2014, 5, 30-54, doi:10.33423/ijba.v5i1.1141. · DOI
  5. Buchman, S.; Evans, J.M.; Mackinnon, M.; Gradin, S.; Wright, F.C. Bridging silos: Delivering integrated care to patients with cancer in Ontario, Canada. Psycho-Oncology 2018, 27, 2673-2676, doi:10.1002/pon.4858. · DOI
  6. Bundred, S. Solutions to silos: Joining up knowledge. Public Money Manag. 2006, 26, 125-130, doi:10.1111/j.1467-9302.2006.00511.x. · DOI
  7. Casciaro, T.; Edmondson, A.C.; Jang, S. Cross-silo leadership: How to create more value by connecting experts from inside and outside the organization. Harv. Bus. Rev. 2019, 97, 130-139.
  8. Cromity, J.; de Stricker, U. Silo persistence: It's not the technology, it's the culture! New Rev. Inf. Netw. 2011, 16, 167-184, doi:10.1080/13614576.2011.619924. · DOI
  9. de Waal, A.; Weaver, M.; Day, T.; van der Heijden, B. Silo-busting: Overcoming the greatest threat to organizational performance. Sustainability 2019, 11, 21, doi:10.3390/su11236860. · DOI
  10. Dell, R.K. Breaking organizational silos: Removing barriers to exceptional performance. J. Am. Water Works Assoc. 2005, 97, 34-37, doi:10.1002/j.1551-8833.2005.tb10902.x. · DOI
  11. Doerr, K.H.; Kang, K. Bi-criteria risk analysis of domain-specific and cross-domain changes in complex systems. Comput. Ind. Eng. 2014, 73, 51-60, doi:10.1016/j.cie.2014.04.009. · DOI
  12. Forsten-Astikainen, R.; Hurmelinna-Laukkanen, P.; Lämsä, T.; Heilmann, P.; Hyrkäs, E. Dealing with organizational silos with communities of practice and human resource management. J. Workplace Learn. 2017, 29, 473-489, doi:10.1108/JWL-04-2015-0028. · DOI
  13. Fralicx, R. Strange bed(side) fellows physician-finance collaboration. Healthc. Financ. Manag. 2012, 66, 90-96.
  14. Gyrd-Jones, R.I.; Helm, C.; Munk, J. Exploring the impact of silos in achieving brand orientation. J. Mark. Manag. 2013, 29, 1056-1078, doi:10.1080/0267257X.2013.811283. · DOI
  15. Hallowell, B.; Turisco, F. Breaking down IT silos a "connected" way to improve customer experience and the bottom line. Healthc. Financ. Manag. 2009, 63, 58-64.
  16. Hemon, A.; Lyonnet, B.; Rowe, F.; Fitzgerald, B. From agile to DevOps: Smart skills and collaborations. Inf. Syst. Front. 2019, doi:10.1007/s10796-019-09905-1. · DOI
  17. Hwang, E.H.; Krackhardt, D. Online knowledge communities: Breaking or sustaining knowledge silos? Prod. Oper. Manag. 2020, 29, 138-155, doi:10.1111/poms.13098. · DOI
  18. Kowalski, M. Breaking down silo walls: Successful collaboration across library departments. Libr. Leadersh. Manag. 2017, 31, doi:10.5860/llm.v31i2.7202. · DOI
  19. Lank, E.; Randell-Khan, J.; Rosenbaum, S.; Tate, O. Herding cats: Choosing a governance structure for your communities of practice. J. Chang. Manag. 2008, 8, 101-109, doi:10.1080/14697010701838771. · DOI
  20. Mace-Vadjunec, D.; Hileman, B.M.; Melnykovich, M.B.; Hanes, M.C.; Chance, E.A.; Emerick, E.S. The lack of common goals and communication within a level I trauma system. J. Trauma Nurs. 2015, 22, 274-281, doi:10.1097/JTN.0000000000000153. · DOI
  21. Marren, J.P.; Feazell, G.L.; Paddock, M.W. The hospital board at risk and the need to restructure the relationship with the medical staff: Bylaws, peer review and related solutions. Ann. Health Law 2003, 12, 179-234.
  22. McAdam, R. Fragmenting the function-process interface: The role of process benchmarking. Benchmarking Int. J. 2001, 8, 332-349, doi:10.1108/EUM0000000005953. · DOI
  23. Miller, L.C.; Jones, B.B.; Graves, R.S.; Sievert, M.C. Merging silos: Collaborating for information literacy. J. Contin. Educ. Nurs. 2010, 41, 1-6, doi:10.3928/00220124-20100401-03. · DOI
  24. Mitchell, R.; Parker, V.; Giles, M.; White, N. Toward realizing the potential of diversity in composition of interprofessional health care teams: An examination of the cognitive and psychosocial dynamics of interprofessional collaboration. Med. Care Res. Rev. 2010, 67, 3-26, doi:10.1177/1077558709338478. · DOI
  25. Mohamed, M.; Stankosky, M.; Murray, A. Applying knowledge management principles to enhance cross-functional team performance. J. Knowl. Manag. 2004, 8, 127-142, doi:10.1108/13673270410541097. · DOI
  26. Mohler, M.J. Collaboration across clinical silos. Front. Health Serv. Manag. 2013, 29, 36-44.
  27. Neill, M.S.; Jiang, H. Functional silos, integration & encroachment in internal communication. Public Relat. Rev. 2017, 43, 850-862, doi:10.1016/j.pubrev.2017.06.009. · DOI
  28. Oksanen-Ylikoski, E.; Ylikoski, T. Tensions in creating an innovative community of vocational education and entrepreneurship. Int. J. Innov. Creat. Chang. 2015, 2, 76-82.
  29. Overton, P. Breaking down silos in drug development why interdisciplinary integration is fundamental for pharma's future. Drug Discov. World 2017, 18, 49-52.
  30. Paquin, H.; Bank, I.; Young, M.; Nguyen, L.H.P.; Fisher, R.; Nugus, P. Leadership in crisis situations: Merging the interdisciplinary silos. Leadersh. Health Serv. 2018, 31, 110-128, doi:10.1108/LHS-02-2017-0010. · DOI
  31. Porck, J.P.; van Knippenberg, D.; Tarakci, M.; Ateş, N.Y.; Groenen, P.J.F.; de Haas, M. Do group and organizational identification help or hurt intergroup strategic consensus? J. Manag. 2020, 46, 234-260, doi:10.1177/0149206318788434. · DOI
  32. Scott, J.M.; Hawkins, P. Organisational silos: Affecting the discharge of elderly patients. J. Health Organ. Manag. 2008, 22, 309-318, doi:10.1108/14777260810883567. · DOI
  33. Silvestro, R.; Westley, C. Challenging the paradigm of the process enterprise: A case-study analysis of BPR implementation. Omega Int. J. Manag. Sci. 2002, 30, 215-225, doi:10.1016/S0305-0483(02)00028-2. · DOI
  34. Stoller, J.K.; Sasidhar, M.; Wheeler, D.M.; Chatburn, R.L.; Bivens, R.T.; Priganc, D.; Orens, D.K. Team-building and change management in respiratory care: Description of a process and outcomes. Respir. Care 2010, 55, 741-748.
  35. Vatanpour, H.; Khorramnia, A.; Forutan, N. Silo effect a prominence factor to decrease efficiency of pharmaceutical industry. Iran. J. Pharm. Res. 2013, 12, 203-212.
  36. Walton, P. Information evolution and organisations. Information 2019, 10, 29, doi:10.3390/info10120393. · DOI
  37. Wolak, E.; Ballard, A.; Thomas, M.; Newell, E.; Livingston, B.; Finch, D.; Hawkins, R.; Pickett, J. Breaking down departmental silos for a common purpose. Nurse Lead. 2012, 10, 32-36, doi:10.1016/j.mnl.2012.05.004. · DOI
  38. Sandaker, I. A selectionist perspective on systemic and behavioral change in organizations. J. Organ. Behav. Manag. 2009, 29, 276-293. [CrossRef] · DOI
  39. Clement, J.; Puranam, P. Searching for structure: Formal organization design as a guide to network evolution. Manag. Sci. 2018, 64, 3879-3895. [CrossRef] · DOI
  40. Bento, F.; Garotti, L. Resilience beyond formal structures: A network perspective towards the challenges of an aging workforce in the oil and gas industry. J. Open Innov. Technol. Mark. Complex. 2019, 5, 15. [CrossRef] · DOI
  41. Burke, W.W. Organization Change: Theory and Practice; SAGE: London, UK, 2014; Volume 4.
  42. Centola, D. How Behavior Spreads: The Science of Complex Contagions; Princeton University Press: Princeton, NJ, USA, 2018; Volume 3.
  43. Cromity, J.; de Stricker, U. Silo persistence: It's not the technology, it's the culture! New Rev. Inf. Netw. 2011, 16, 167-184. [CrossRef] · DOI
  44. Lessard, D.R.; Zaheer, S. Breaking the silos: Distributed knowledge and strategic responses to volatile exchange rates. Strateg. Manag. J. 1996, 17, 513-533. [CrossRef] · DOI
  45. Cilliers, F.; Greyvenstein, H. The impact of silo mentality on team identity: An organisational case study. J. Ind. Psychol. 2012, 38, 75-84. [CrossRef] · DOI
  46. Guilbeault, D.; Becker, J.; Centola, D. Complex Contagions: A Decade in Review. In Complex Spreading Phenomena in Social Systems; Lehmann, S., Ahn, Y.-Y., Eds.; Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2018; pp. 3-25.
  47. Zheng, M.; Lü, L.; Zhao, M. Spreading in online social networks: The role of social reinforcement. Phys. Rev. E 2013, 88, 012818. [CrossRef] · DOI
  48. Glenn, S.S.; Malott, M.E. Complexity and selection: Implications for organizational change. Behav. Soc. Issues 2004, 13, 89-106. [CrossRef] · DOI
  49. Glenn, S.S.; Malott, M.E.; Andery, M.A.P.A.; Benvenuti, M.F.L.; Houmanfar, R.A.; Sandaker, I.; Todorov, J.C.; Tourinho, E.Z.; Vasconcelos, L.A. Toward consistent terminology in a behaviorist approach to cultural analysis. Behav. Soc. Issues 2016, 25, 11-27. [CrossRef] · DOI
  50. Malott, M.E.; Glenn, S.S. Targets of intervention in cultural and behavioral change. Behav. Soc. Issues 2006, 15, 31-56. [CrossRef] · DOI
  51. Ludwig, T.D. Process safety behavioral systems: Behaviors interlock in complex metacontingencies. J. Organ. Behav. Manag. 2017, 37, 224-239. [CrossRef] · DOI
  52. Houmanfar, R.A.; Rodrigues, N.J. The metacontingency and the behavioral contingency: Points of contact and departure. Behav. Soc. Issues 2006, 15, 13-30. [CrossRef] · DOI
  53. Borba, A.; Tourinho, E.Z.; Glenn, S.S. Effects of cultural consequences on the interlocking behavioral contingencies of ethical self-control. Psychol. Rec. 2017, 67, 399-411. [CrossRef] · DOI
  54. Borgatti, S.P.; Mehra, A.; Brass, D.J.; Labianca, G. Network analysis in the social sciences. Science 2009, 323, 892-895. [CrossRef] [PubMed] · DOI
  55. Li, A.; Zhou, L.; Su, Q.; Cornelius, S.P.; Liu, Y.-Y.; Wang, L.; Levin, S.A. Evolution of cooperation on temporal networks. Nat. Commun. 2020, 11, 2259. [CrossRef] [PubMed] · DOI
  56. Emmons, S.; Kobourov, S.; Gallant, M.; Börner, K. Analysis of network clustering algorithms and cluster quality metrics at scale. PLoS ONE 2016, 11, e0159161. [CrossRef] · DOI
  57. Mishra, N.; Schreiber, R.; Stanton, I.; Tarjan, R.E. Clustering Social Networks; Springer-Verlag: Heidelberg, Germany, 2007; pp. 56-67.
  58. Carpenter, M.A.; Li, M.; Jiang, H. Social network research in organizational contexts: A systematic review of methodological issues and choices. J. Manag. 2012, 38, 1328-1361. [CrossRef] · DOI
  59. Arksey, H.; O'Malley, L. Scoping studies: Towards a methodological framework. Int. J. Soc. Res. Methodol. 2005, 8, 19-32. [CrossRef] · DOI · Paper page
  60. Dickinson, A.M. The Historical Roots of Organizational Behavior Management in the Private Sector. J. Organ. Behav. Manag. 2001, 20, 9-58. [CrossRef] · DOI
  61. Grigsby, R.K. Enhancing the behavioral science knowledge and skills of 21st-century leaders in academic medicine and science. J. Organ. Behav. Manag. 2015, 35, 123-134. [CrossRef] · DOI
  62. Abernathy, W.B. Implications and Applications of a Behavior Systems Perspective. J. Organ. Behav. Manag. 2008, 28, 123-138. [CrossRef] · DOI
  63. Baker, T.; Schwenk, T.; Piasecki, M.; Smith, G.S.; Reimer, D.; Jacobs, N.; Shonkwiler, G.; Hagen, J.; Houmanfar, R.A. Cultural Change in a Medical School: A Data-Driven Management of Entropy. J. Organ. Behav. Manag. 2015, 35, 95-122. [CrossRef] · DOI
  64. de Carvalho, L.C.; Sandaker, I. Interlocking behavior and cultural selection. Nor. Tidsskr. Atferdsanalyse 2016, 43, 19-25.
  65. Serrat, O. Bridging Organizational Silos; Springer: New York, NY, USA, 2017.
  66. Parsons, T. The Social System; Routledge: London, UK, 1951.
  67. Skyttner, L. General Systems Theory: Problems, Perspectives, Practice, 2nd ed.; World Scientific: Hackensack, NJ, USA, 2005.
  68. Bandura, A. Social Learning Theory; General Learning Press: New York, NY, USA, 1977.
  69. Bandura, A. Toward a psychology of human agency. Perspect. Psychol. Sci. 2006, 1, 164-180. [CrossRef] [PubMed] · DOI · Paper page
  70. Reynolds, C.R., Vannest, K.J., Fletcher-Janzen, E., Eds.; Wiley: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2014. [CrossRef] · DOI
  71. Weiss, H.M. Social learning of work values in organizations. J. Appl. Psychol. 1978, 63, 711-718. [CrossRef] · DOI
  72. Lam, S.K.; Kraus, F.; Ahearne, M. The diffusion of market orientation throughout the organization: A social learning theory perspective. J. Mark. 2010, 7, 61-79. [CrossRef] · DOI
  73. Sims, H.P.; Lorenzi, P. The New Leadership Paradigm: Social Learning and Cognition in Organizations; Sage Publications: Thousand Oaks, CA, USA, 1992.
  74. Diener, L.H.; McGee, H.M.; Miguel, C.F. An integrated approach for conducting a behavioral systems analysis. J. Organ. Behav. Manag. 2009, 29, 108-135. [CrossRef] · DOI
  75. Todorov, J.C.; de Oliveira Castro, J.M.; Hanna, E.S.; Bittencourt de Sa, M.C.; Barreto, M.Q. Choice, experience, and the generalized matching law. J. Exp. Anal. Behav. 1983, 40, 99-111. [CrossRef] · DOI
  76. Vilas-Boas, D.L.O., Cassas, F., Gusso, H.L., Eds.; Associação Brasileira de Psicologia e Medicina Comportamental [Brazilian Association of Psychology and Behavioral Medicine]: São Paulo, Brazil, 2017; Volume 5, pp. 28-40.
  77. Eriksson, A.; Orvik, A.; Strandmark, M.; Nordsteien, A.; Torp, S. Management and leadership approaches to health promotion and sustainable workplaces: A scoping review. Societies 2017, 7, 14. [CrossRef] · DOI
  78. Moore, R.; Hamilton, P. 'Silo Mentalities' and Their Impact on Service Delivery in Prison-Community Transitions: A Case Study of Resettlement Provision at a Male Open Prison. Howard J. Crime Justice 2016, 55, 111-130. [CrossRef] · DOI
  79. Seemann, J.; Gustafsson, J. Inter-organizational management and coordination in Danish health care. Int. J. Integr. Care 2013, 13, 1. [CrossRef] · DOI
  80. Gough, M.Z.; Reece, J. The Impact of the Sustainable Communities Initiative on Engagement and Collaboration in Planning: Experiences from Four U.S. Regions. Cityscape 2017, 19, 115-134.
  81. van der Jagt, A.P.N.; Lawrence, A. Local government and urban forest governance: Insights from Scotland. Scand. J. For. Res. 2019, 34, 53-66. [CrossRef] · DOI
  82. Liberati, A.; Altman, D.G.; Tetzlaff, J.; Mulrow, C.; Gotzsche, P.C.; Ioannidis, J.P.; Clarke, M.; Devereaux, P.J.; Kleijnen, J.; Moher, D. The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate health care interventions: Explanation and elaboration. PLoS Med. 2009, 6, e1000100. [CrossRef] · DOI · Paper page
  83. Heinecke Thulstrup, S.; Eklund Karlsson, L. Children of imprisoned parents and their coping strategies: A systematic review. Societies 2017, 7, 15. [CrossRef] · DOI
  84. Bannister, F. Dismantling the silos: Extracting new value from IT investments in public administration. Inf. Syst. J. 2001, 11, 65-84. [CrossRef] · DOI
  85. Bates, A. Bridge the gap from strategy to execution: Culture change that sticks. Strateg. HR Rev. 2017, 16, 222-228. [CrossRef] · DOI
  86. Forsten-Astikainen, R.; Hurmelinna-Laukkanen, P.; Lämsä, T.; Heilmann, P.; Hyrkäs, E. Dealing with organizational silos with communities of practice and human resource management. J. Workplace Learn. 2017, 29, 473-489. [CrossRef] · DOI
  87. Hwang, E.H.; Krackhardt, D. Online knowledge communities: Breaking or sustaining knowledge silos? Prod. Oper. Manag. 2020, 29, 138-155. [CrossRef] · DOI
  88. Walton, P. Information evolution and organisations. Information 2019, 10, 393. [CrossRef] · DOI
  89. Porck, J.P.; van Knippenberg, D.; Tarakci, M.; Ateş, N.Y.; Groenen, P.J.F.; de Haas, M. Do group and organizational identification help or hurt intergroup strategic consensus? J. Manag. 2020, 46, 234-260. [CrossRef] · DOI
  90. Oksanen-Ylikoski, E.; Ylikoski, T. Tensions in creating an innovative community of vocational education and entrepreneurship. Int. J. Innov. Creat. Chang. 2015, 2, 76-82.
  91. Hemon, A.; Lyonnet, B.; Rowe, F.; Fitzgerald, B. From agile to DevOps: Smart skills and collaborations. Inf. Syst. Front. 2019, 1-19. [CrossRef] · DOI
  92. Buchman, S.; Evans, J.M.; Mackinnon, M.; Gradin, S.; Wright, F.C. Bridging silos: Delivering integrated care to patients with cancer in Ontario, Canada. Psycho-Oncology 2018, 27, 2673-2676. [CrossRef] · DOI
  93. Scott, J.M.; Hawkins, P. Organisational silos: Affecting the discharge of elderly patients. J. Health Organ. Manag. 2008, 22, 309-318. [CrossRef] [PubMed] · DOI
  94. Wolak, E.; Ballard, A.; Thomas, M.; Newell, E.; Livingston, B.; Finch, D.; Hawkins, R.; Pickett, J. Breaking down departmental silos for a common purpose. Nurse Lead. 2012, 10, 32-36. [CrossRef] · DOI
  95. Stoller, J.K.; Sasidhar, M.; Wheeler, D.M.; Chatburn, R.L.; Bivens, R.T.; Priganc, D.; Orens, D.K. Team-building and change management in respiratory care: Description of a process and outcomes. Respir. Care 2010, 55, 741-748.
  96. Silvestro, R.; Westley, C. Challenging the paradigm of the process enterprise: A case-study analysis of BPR implementation. Omega Int. J. Manag. Sci. 2002, 30, 215-225. [CrossRef] · DOI
  97. Neill, M.S.; Jiang, H. Functional silos, integration & encroachment in internal communication. Public Relat. Rev. 2017, 43, 850-862. [CrossRef] · DOI
  98. Holmes, R.D.; Steele, J.G.; Exley, C.; Vernazza, C.R.; Donaldson, C. Use of programme budgeting and marginal analysis to set priorities for local NHS dental services: Learning from the north east of England. J. Public Health 2018, 40, E578-E585. [CrossRef] · DOI
  99. Lara, P.; Sánchez, M.; Villalobos, J. OT Modeling: The Enterprise Beyond IT. Bus. Inf. Syst. Eng. 2019, 61, 399-411. [CrossRef] · DOI
  100. Jones, H. Risking knowledge management. An information audit of risk management activities within the Hobart City Council. Libr. Manag. 2005, 26, 397-407. [CrossRef] · DOI
  101. Jardine, E. The Library Leading: Knowledge Management Supporting Community College Institutional Strategy. New Rev. Acad. Librariansh. 2018, 24, 394-405. [CrossRef] · DOI
  102. Jessop, J. Optimizing mining operations: Integration across the mining enterprise is key to increased productivity. ABB Rev. 2012, 3, 39-43.
  103. Wanberg, J.; Javernick-Will, A.; Chinowsky, P.; Taylor, J.E. Spanning Cultural and Geographic Barriers with Knowledge Pipelines in Multinational Communities of Practice. J. Constr. Eng. Manag. 2015, 141, 10. [CrossRef] · DOI
  104. Braithwaite, J.; Clay-Williams, R.; Vecellio, E.; Marks, D.; Hooper, T.; Westbrook, M.; Westbrook, J.; Blakely, B.; Ludlow, K. The basis of clinical tribalism, hierarchy and stereotyping: A laboratory-controlled teamwork experiment. BMJ Open 2016, 6, 1-10. [CrossRef] · DOI
  105. Schmidt, R.; Lange, O. Account Management 2.0: From Silo Thinking to Integrated Account Development. J. Bus. Chem. 2014, 11, 77-86.
  106. Hansen-Ketchum, P.A.; Halpenny, E.A. Engaging with nature to promote health: Bridging research silos to examine the evidence. Health Promot. Int. 2011, 26, 100-108. [CrossRef] · DOI
  107. Paine, L.A.; Baker, D.R.; Rosenstein, B.; Pronovost, P.J. The Johns Hopkins Hospital: Identifying and addressing risks and safety issues. Jt. Comm. J. Qual. Saf. 2004, 30, 543-550. [CrossRef] · DOI
  108. Sy, T.; D'Annunzio, L.S. Challenges and Strategies of Matrix Organizations: Top-Level and Mid-Level Managers' Perspectives. Hum. Resour. Plan. 2005, 28, 39-48.
  109. Towse, A. The efficient use of pharmaceuticals: Does Europe have any lessons for a medicare drug benefit? Health Aff. 2003, 22, 42-45. [CrossRef] · DOI
  110. Sagarik, D.; Chansukree, P.; Cho, W.; Berman, E. E-government 4.0 in Thailand: The role of central agencies. Inf. Polity 2018, 23, 343-353. [CrossRef] · DOI
  111. Parks, R.; Wigand, R.T.; Othmani, M.B.; Serhier, Z.; Bouhaddou, O. Electronic health records implementation in Morocco: Challenges of silo efforts and recommendations for improvements. Int. J. Med. Inform. 2019, 129, 430-437. [CrossRef] · DOI
  112. Berndt, A.E.; Parsons, M.; Golightly-Jenkins, C. Evaluating an Innovative Educational Strategy for Health Care Organizations. Building Bridges Across Historical Silos for Quality. Perioper. Nurs. Clin. 2012, 7, 315-325. [CrossRef] · DOI
  113. Gray, B. Enhancing Transdisciplinary Research Through Collaborative Leadership. Am. J. Prev. Med. 2008, 35, S124-S132. [CrossRef] · DOI
  114. Kelty, S.F.; Julian, R.; Ross, A. Dismantling the Justice Silos: Avoiding the pitfalls and reaping the benefits of information-sharing between forensic science, medicine and law. Forensic Sci. Int. 2013, 230, 8-15. [CrossRef] · DOI
  115. Livingstone, M.; Dibkey, B. Utilising performance measurement to drive operational excellence in a post-merger environment. J. Facil. Manag. 2002, 1, 131-141. [CrossRef] · DOI
  116. Harris, P. Holistic skills management comes of age. T AND D 2007, 61, 46-51.
  117. Sayles, J.S.; Baggio, J.A. Who collaborates and why: Assessment and diagnostic of governance network integration for salmon restoration in Puget Sound, USA. J. Environ. Manag. 2017, 186, 64-78. [CrossRef] [PubMed] · DOI
  118. Fisher Iii, W.W.; Oberholzer-Gee, F. Strategic management of intellectual property: An integragted approach. Calif. Manag. Rev. 2013, 55, 157-183. [CrossRef] · DOI
  119. Thong, R.; Lotta, T. Creating a Culture of Productivity and Collaborative Innovation. Res. Technol. Manag. 2015, 58, 41-50. [CrossRef] · DOI
  120. Garrido, A.L.; Sangiao, S.; Cardiel, O. Improving the Generation of Infoboxes from Data Silos through Machine Learning and the Use of Semantic Repositories. Int. J. Artif. Intell. Tools 2017, 26, 28. [CrossRef] · DOI
  121. Scholtz, B.; Calitz, A.; Haupt, R. A business intelligence framework for sustainability information management in higher education. Int. J. Sustain. High. Educ. 2018, 19, 266-290. [CrossRef] · DOI
  122. Güngör, K.; Hotez, P.J.; Özdemir, V.; Aynacıo glu, Ş. Glaucomics: A Call for Systems Diagnostics for 21st Century Ophthalmology and Personalized Visual Health. Omics J. Integr. Biol. 2014, 18, 275-279. [CrossRef] · DOI
  123. Connell, J.; Voola, R. Strategic alliances and knowledge sharing: Synergies or silos? J. Knowl. Manag. 2007, 11, 52-66. [CrossRef] · DOI
  124. Kreindler, S.A.; Dowd, D.A.; Dana Star, N.; Gottschalk, T. Silos and social identity: The social identity approach as a framework for understanding and overcoming divisions in health care. Milbank Q. 2012, 90, 347-374. [CrossRef] 100. Marren, J.P.; Feazell, G.L.; Paddock, M.W. The hospital board at risk and the need to restructure the relationship with the medical staff: Bylaws, peer review and related solutions. Ann. Health Law 2003, 12, 179-234. 101. Vatanpour, H.; Khorramnia, A.; Forutan, N. Silo effect a prominence factor to decrease efficiency of pharmaceutical industry. Iran. J. Pharm. Res. 2013, 12, 203-212. 102. · DOI · Paper page
  125. Borgatti, S.P.; Everett, M.G.; Johnson, J.C. Analyzing Social Networks; Sage: Thousand Oaks, CA, USA, 2018. 103. Jokar, E.; Mosleh, M. Community detection in social networks based on improved Label Propagation Algorithm and balanced link density. Phys. Lett. A 2019, 383, 718-727. [CrossRef] 104. Krapfl, J.E.; Cooke, J.; Sullivan, T.; Cogar, W. Iterative Processes and Reciprocal Controlling Relationships in a Systemic Intervention. J. Organ. Behav. Manag. 2009, 29, 136-154. [CrossRef] 105. · DOI
  126. Vasu, M.L.; Stewart, D.W.; Garson, G.D. Organizational Behavior and Public Management, Revised and Expanded; Taylor & Francis: Abingdon, UK, 2017. 106. Bundred, S. Solutions to silos: Joining up knowledge. Public Money Manag. 2006, 26, 125-130. [CrossRef] 107. Houmanfar, R.A.; Rodrigues, N.J.; Smith, G.S. Role of communication networks in behavioral systems analysis. J. Organ. Behav. Manag. 2009, 29, 257-275. [CrossRef] 108. Gyrd-Jones, R.I.; Helm, C.; Munk, J. Exploring the impact of silos in achieving brand orientation. J. Mark. Manag. 2013, 29, 1056-1078. [CrossRef] 109. Miller, L.C.; Jones, B.B.; Graves, R.S.; Sievert, M.C. Merging silos: Collaborating for information literacy. J. Contin. Educ. Nurs. 2010, 41, 1-6. [CrossRef] [PubMed] 110. · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Bento, F., Tagliabue, M., & Lorenzo, F.
Affiliations
  • OsloMet – Oslo Metropolitan University (NO)
  • Universidade de Brasília (BR)
Corresponding author
Bento, Fabio
Venue
Societies
Publisher
MDPI AG
Published
2020-07-24
Volume
10
Issue
3
Pages
56
ISSN
2075-4698 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3044530398
Cited by
103
References
4
Citations by year
2026: 36 · 2025: 28 · 2024: 18 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 1
FWCI
5.40
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Societies (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • NORA - Norwegian Open Research Archives (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • NORA - Norwegian Open Research Archives (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior ((Code 001))
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Team Dynamics and Performance
  • Social Sciences › Communication › Knowledge Management and Sharing
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Organizational Management and Innovation
Keywords
organizational silos, network clusters, organizational behavior, communication barriers, organizational interventions, internal cooperation, innovation, social reinforcement, organizational goals

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review