The DOI matches its Crossref record; 34 of the 34 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Environmental Regulation, Government R&D Funding and Green Technology Innovation: Evidence from China Provincial Data
Open accessAbstract
The “environmental pollution–economic development” circle is a problem in the process of national sustainable development. As a complex concept of environmental protection and technology innovation, green technology innovation is the key to cracking this strange circle. This paper divides green technology innovation into green product innovation and green process innovation and measures green technology innovation based on the perspective of energy saving and emission reduction. Furthermore, we examine the effects of environmental regulation and government R&D funding on green technology innovation. The empirical findings are as follows: (1) from the dynamic point of view, we test whether there is a significant ”U-shaped” relationship between environmental regulation and green technological innovation, and we find there exists an “inflection point” in the role of environmental regulation in green technology innovation, and China is at the stage of inhibition before the “inflection point”; (2) direct government funding and tax incentives can promote green technology innovation, but the promotion of government tax incentives to green technology innovation is not significant; (3) the interaction between environmental regulation and government R&D will promote green product innovation and inhibit green process innovation, which is closely related to the imbalance of environmental regulation intensity in energy saving and emission reduction. In addition, this paper also gives out three kinds of control variables (the level of regional development, the proportion of the regional manufacturing industry, and the development level of regional export-oriented economy) and presents their effects on green technology innovation.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Endogenous Technological Change
Romer, P. M. (1990) · Journal of Political Economy · doi:10.1086/261725 · Cited by 17,711
Toward a New Conception of the Environment-Competitiveness Relationship
Porter, M. E., & Linde, C. V. D. (1995) · Journal of Economic Perspectives · doi:10.1257/jep.9.4.97 · Cited by 13,365
The Influence of Green Innovation Performance on Corporate Advantage in Taiwan
Chen, Y.-S., Lai, S.-B., & Wen, C.-T. (2006) · Journal of Business Ethics · doi:10.1007/s10551-006-9025-5 · Cited by 2,684
Determinants of environmental innovation in US manufacturing industries
Brunnermeier, S. B., & Cohen, M. A. (2003) · Journal of Environmental Economics and Management · doi:10.1016/s0095-0696(02)00058-x · Cited by 1,586
Chiou, T.-Y., Chan, H. K., Lettice, F., & Chung, S. H. (2011) · Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review · doi:10.1016/j.tre.2011.05.016 · Cited by 1,339
Wallsten, S. J. (2000) · The RAND Journal of Economics · doi:10.2307/2601030 · Cited by 1,068
Public policies against global warming: a supply side approach
Sinn, H.-W. (2008) · International Tax and Public Finance · doi:10.1007/s10797-008-9082-z · Cited by 1,014
How effective are fiscal incentives for R&D? A review of the evidence
Hall, B., & Van Reenen, J. (2000) · Research Policy · doi:10.1016/s0048-7333(99)00085-2 · Cited by 1,012
Environmental regulation and productivity: testing the porter hypothesis
Lanoie, P., Patry, M., & Lajeunesse, R. (2008) · Journal of Productivity Analysis · doi:10.1007/s11123-008-0108-4 · Cited by 808
Environmental Regulation and Productivity: Evidence from Oil Refineries
Berman, E., & Bui, L. T. M. (2001) · Review of Economics and Statistics · doi:10.1162/00346530152480144 · Cited by 749
Cited by
Anwar, M., Khattak, M. S., Popp, J., Meyer, D. F., & Máté, D. (2020) · Technological and Economic Development of Economy · doi:10.3846/tede.2020.13404 · Cited by 46
“Hence, the government should facilitate the industries to reduce environmental pollution to create a clean environment (Guo et al., 2018).”
Background
Metadata
- Authors
- Guo, Y., Xia, X., Zhang, S., & Zhang, D.
- Venue
- Sustainability
- Publisher
- MDPI AG
- Published
- 2018-03-23
- Volume
- 10
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 940
- ISSN
- 2071-1050 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2789696442
- Cited by
- 341
- References
- 34
- FWCI
- 41.50
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Environmental Regulation, Government R&D Funding and Green Technology Innovation: Evidence from China Provincial Data. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.3390/su10040940
- The paper
- Guo, Y., Xia, X., Zhang, S., & Zhang, D. (2018). Environmental Regulation, Government R&D Funding and Green Technology Innovation: Evidence from China Provincial Data. Sustainability. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10040940
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.