Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 710

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 48 of the 48 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The Role and Impact of Industry 4.0 and the Internet of Things on the Business Strategy of the Value Chain—The Case of Hungary

Open access
Nagy, Judit, Oláh, Judit, Erdei, Edina, Máté, Domicián, Popp, József·2018·Sustainability

Abstract

In the era of industrial digitalization, companies are increasingly investing in tools and solutions that allow their processes, machines, employees, and even the products themselves, to be integrated into a single integrated network for data collection, data analysis, the evaluation of company development, and performance improvement. To study the impact of Industry 4.0 on the company we used Porter’s (1985) value chain model, which is particularly useful when paying particular attention to corporate areas which have a primary role in customer value creation. Since the primary impact of Industry 4.0 is perceived in value-creating processes, and has so far had the greatest transformative effect in this area, the model can be considered to be appropriate. The objective of our research is to discover how companies operating in Hungary interpret the phenomenon of Industry 4.0, what Internet of Things (IoT) tools they use to support their processes, and what critical issues they face during adaptation. We applied a dual methodology in our investigation: We sent an online questionnaire to manufacturing and logistical service companies to investigate the IoT tools they use, and the problems they face, and received 43 answers we could evaluate. We also conducted four expert interviews with manufacturing firms to get deeper insights into the application, critical issues and development phases of IoT tools. During our research, we found that the spread of real-time data across companies—given the availability of appropriate analytical tools and methods—can have a significant impact on the entire company. In the case of CPS (Cyber Physical System), CPPS and Big Data Technologies, companies using them have been evaluated as having a higher level of logistic service, more efficient processes with their partners, improved cooperation between certain logistic functions, and higher market and financial performance and competitiveness. Applying more efficient production processes, and achieving better productivity and economies of scale, might also result in increased economic sustainability. Furthermore, we have found that companies have started on the path to digital evolution, and investments of this type have already begun.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3390/su10103491

Cites

48 of 48 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 48 references

Research works printed but not linked: 10

  1. Nick, 2016, How to Measure Industry 4.0 Readiness of Cities, Int. Sci. J. Ind. 4.0, 2, 64
  2. Bildstein, A., and Seidelmann, J. (2016). Migration zur Industrie-4.0-Fertigung, Springer Vieweg. · doi:10.1007/978-3-662-45279-0_44
  3. Popp, 2018, A precíziós gazdálkodás kilátásai Magyarországon, Int. J. Eng. Manag. Sci., 3, 133
  4. 2017, Shared Services Centres in Central and Eastern Europe: The Examples of Poland and Slovakia, Econ. Sociol., 10, 46
  5. Porter, M.A. (1985). Competitive Advantage: Creating and Sustaining Superior Performance, Free Press.
  6. PwC (2016). Industry 4.0-Building the Digital Enterprise, PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP. Available online: https://www.google.com/search?q=PwC+%282016%29%3A+Industry+4.0+-+Building+the+digital+enterprise.+PricewaterhouseCoopers+LLP+Hermann%2C+M.%2C+Pentek%2C+T.%2C+Otto%2C+B.+%282016%29%3A+Design+principles+for+industrie+4.0+scenarios.+In+System+Sciences+%28HICSS%29%2C+2016+49th+Hawaii+International+Conference+on+%28p.+392&ie=utf-8&oe=utf-8&client=firefox-b.
  7. Reinhart, G., Engelhardt, P., Geiger, F., Philipp, T.R., Wahlster, W., Zühlke, D., Schlick, J., Becker, T., Löckelt, M., and Pirvu, B. (2013). CYBER physical Production-Systeme: Enhancement of Productivity and Flexibility by Networking of Intelligent Systems in the Factor, Springer.
  8. Kocsi, B., and Oláh, J. (2017). Potential connections of unique manufacturing and industry 4.0. LogForum, 13. · doi:10.17270/j.log.2017.4.1
  9. Piccarozzi, M., Abbate, T., and Aquilani, B. (2017, January 14). Do platforms contribute to value co-creation processes? Insights from a service-dominant logic perspective. Proceedings of the 20th Excellence in Services International Conferences, Verona, Italy.
  10. Kliestikova, 2017, Bankruptcy in Slovakia: International comparison of the creditor’s position, Oecon. Copernic., 8, 221, 10.24136/oc.v8i2.14 · doi:10.24136/oc.v8i2.14

Cited by

See all 710

Metadata

Authors
Nagy, J., Oláh, J., Erdei, E., Máté, D., & Popp, J.
Venue
Sustainability
Publisher
MDPI AG
Published
2018-09-29
Volume
10
Issue
10
Pages
3491
ISSN
2071-1050 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2894592380
Cited by
710
References
48
FWCI
58.36
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
gold

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Role and Impact of Industry 4.0 and the Internet of Things on the Business Strategy of the Value Chain—The Case of Hungary. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.3390/su10103491
The paper
Nagy, J., Oláh, J., Erdei, E., Máté, D., & Popp, J. (2018). The Role and Impact of Industry 4.0 and the Internet of Things on the Business Strategy of the Value Chain—The Case of Hungary. Sustainability. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10103491

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.