Cited by 16Agronomic Practices and Intercropping SystemsAgricultural economics and policiesAgricultural Innovations and Practices

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 21 of the 21 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Economic Analysis of Perennial Crop Systems in Dak Lak Province, Vietnam

Open access

Abstract

Dak Lak province, Central Highlands, Vietnam presents an interesting case in perennial crop systems, of which coffee and black pepper are the two premier commodities and contribute a large part to economic growth provincially and at the national level. In recent years, in addition to mono-cropping systems, intercropping systems for diversification have developed quickly. This paper focuses on (1) comparing the economic efficiency of mono-coffee systems (MCSes), mono-pepper systems (MPSes), and coffee and pepper intercropping (CPI) by analyzing startup cost, annual cost, and profits; and (2) identifying the main factors affecting farmers’ decisions to convert their crop systems. The study was carried out by investigating 90 perennial crop samples using the three perennial crop systems (MCSes, MPSes, and CPI) in 2017–2018. Additionally, in-depth interviews and focus group discussion (FGD) methods were applied to collect more information about the operations of each system. Another survey with 37 samples (new plantations) was carried out to compute the startup cost. The findings showed evidence that MCSes had the lowest startup and annual costs, whereas MPSes had the highest costs of the three perennial crop systems. MCSes used less manure or compost in the initial setup and overused chemical fertilizer in annual production. Similarly, MPSes had high pesticide-stimulant costs in the production process to sustain crop development. The study indicated that CPI not only had the highest economic efficiency, but also created the best family employment opportunities of the three systems. Additionally, the study found some social factors that strongly influenced farmers’ decisions to shift their cropping system: These included ethnicity, education, training, and crop failure, in addition to economic factors (profits).

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3390/su11010081

Cites

21 of 21 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 6

  1. International Coffee Organization (2013). ICO Annual Review 2012/13, International Coffee Organization.
  2. Gujarati, D.N. (2009). Basic Econometrics, Tata McGraw-Hill Education.
  3. Le, N.P. (2016, January 12). The Coping Strategies of Coffee Farmers in Response to Water Scarcity: A Case Study of Ethnic Groups in the Central Highlands of Vietnam. Proceedings of the International Conference on the Mekong, Salween and Red Rivers: Sharing Knowledge and Perspectives Across Borders, Bangkok, Thailand.
  4. Long, C. (2007). The Relative Sustainability of Coffee and Mixed Farming Systems in Dak Lak Province, Vietnam. [MSc Thesis, Asian Institute of Technology].
  5. Midmore, D., Yang, S., Kleinhenz, V., Green, S., and Tsay, J. (1992, January 13–14). Intercropping chilli peppers with maize. Proceedings of the Conference on Chilli Pepper Production in the Tropics, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.
  6. Amlinger, F., Nortcliff, S., Weinfurtner, K., and Dreher, P. (2001, January 22–23). Applying compost—Benefits and needs. Proceedings of Seminar Proceedings, Brussels, Belgium.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

  • The socio-economic performance of agroecology. A review

    Mouratiadou, I., Wezel, A., Kamilia, K., Marchetti, A., Paracchini, M. L., & Bàrberi, P. (2024) · Agronomy for Sustainable Development · doi:10.1007/s13593-024-00945-9 · Cited by 96

    “In Vietnam, the intercropping of pepper produced higher profit per family labour compared to monocropping practices (Thuy et al. 2018), and in Malawi, it yielded a higher return to labour in two different areas of implementation (Ngwira et al. 2012).”
    Background

See all 16

Metadata

Authors
Thuy, P. T., Niem, L. D., Ho, T. M. H., Burny, P., & Lebailly, P.
Affiliations
  • University of Liège (BE)
  • Tay Nguyen University (VN)
Corresponding author
Thuy, Phan Thi
Venue
Sustainability
Publisher
MDPI AG
Published
2018-12-24
Volume
11
Issue
1
Pages
81
ISSN
2071-1050 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2906279110
Cited by
16
References
21
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 4
FWCI
2.53
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Sustainability (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Open Repository and Bibliography (University of Liège) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
Bộ Giáo dục và Ðào tạo
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Agronomy and Crop Science › Agronomic Practices and Intercropping Systems
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Agricultural economics and policies
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › General Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Agricultural Innovations and Practices
Keywords
coffee, black pepper, intercropping, monoculture, economic efficiency, start-up costs, production costs, farmer decision-making, chemical fertilizer use, pesticide use, family employment, Dak Lak province

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review