Applying Artificial Intelligence in Physical Education and Future Perspectives
Open accessAbstract
Artificial intelligence (AI) is gradually influencing every aspect of everyday life, including education. AI can also provide special support to learners through academic sustainability or discontinuation predictions. While AI research remains in its early stages, we must examine how it evolves and exerts its potential over time. By utilizing AI in physical education (PE), we can increase its potential use in sports applications, and enact changes upon the nature of PE, its visualization, and repeatability. Based on the concept of AI and related research areas, this study explores its principles and use in PE, and presents a focused, in-depth analysis of the areas of PE technology where AI could be applied—customized PE classes, knowledge provision, learner evaluation, and learner counseling methods. Our findings highlight the expertise required for future PE teachers in applying AI. Regarding practice implications, this study addresses the topic of AI innovations affecting all life domains, including PE; it highlights AI applications’ relevance to PE technology, based on existing research; it proposes that the implications of AI for PE may apply to other educational domains; and finally, it contributes to existing literature and also shares future research prospects regarding AI applications in education and sports.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Teachers paid no attention to ethical concerns such as biased decisions, lack of transparency, privacy issues, and the risk of invasion of privacy.
“which found that teachers paid no attention to ethical concerns, such as biased decisions, lack of transparency, privacy issues, and the risk of invasion of privacy [52,53].”
From Developing AI Literacy for Primary and Middle School Teachers in China: Based on a Structural Equation Modeling Analysis (2022) · cites this paper as [52]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 51 · Cited by 213
Research works printed but not linked: 13
- Sisman-Ugur, S., Kurubacak, G., Eds.; IGI Global: Hershey, PA, USA, 2019; pp. 224-236.
- Russell, S.; Norvig, P. Artificial Intelligence: A Modern Approach, 2nd ed.; Prentice Hall: Upper Saddle River, NJ, USA, 2003.
- Gori, M. Machine Learning: A Constraint-Based Approach; Morgan Kaufmann: Burlington, MA, USA, 2017.
- Alpaydın, E. Machine Learning: The New AI; MIT Press: Cambridge, MA, USA, 2016.
- Lim, Y.; Choi, H.O.; Lee, H.J.; Yun, H.S. Searching for the Possibility of Integrated Adaptation between Understanding by Design and Differentiated Instruction. J. Learn. Cent. Curric. Instr. 2013, 13, 61-83.
- You, J.A. Research on Expertise in Teaching. Korean J. Sport Pedagog. 2000, 7, pp. 41-59. Available online: http://www.dbpia.co. kr/journal/articleDetail?nodeId=NODE06668211 (accessed on 23 December 2020).
- McCullagh, J. Data Mining in Sport: A Neural Network Approach. Int. J. Sports Sci. Eng. 2010, 4, 131-138.
- Lamb, P.; Bartlett, R.; Robins, A. Self-Organizing Maps: An Objective Method for Clustering Complex Human Movement. Int. J. Comput. Sci. Sport 2010, 9, 20-29.
- Bartlett, R.; Lamb, P. The use of artificial neural networks in studying movement coordination. In Proceedings of the 8th International Symposium of the International Association of Computer Science in Sports, Shanghai, China, 21-24 September 2011; pp. 22-33.
- Pullias, E.V.; Young, J.D. A Teacher Is Many Things, 2nd ed.; Indiana University Press: Bloomington, IN, USA, 1977.
- Yang, S. The Possibility of Machine Learning Algorithms for Seon Encounter Dialogues in the 'Chatbot' Development. J. Korean Assoc. Buddh. Stud. 2017, 84, 39-70.
- Guliherme, A. AI and Education: The importance of teacher and student relationship. AI Soc. 2017, 32, 1-8.
- Bandura, A. Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychol. Rev. 1977, 84, 191.
- Authors
- Lee, H. S., & Lee, J.
- Affiliations
- Chung-Ang University (KR)
- Kyung Hee University (KR)
- Corresponding author
- Lee, Junga
- Venue
- Sustainability
- Publisher
- MDPI AG
- Published
- 2021-01-02
- Volume
- 13
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 351
- ISSN
- 2071-1050 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W3120255685
- Cited by
- 213
- References
- 51
- Citations by year
- 2026: 36 · 2025: 60 · 2024: 50 · 2023: 34 · 2022: 27 · 2021: 6
- FWCI
- 10.34
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Sustainability (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Educational Technology and Pedagogy
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Artificial Intelligence in Education
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation › Physical Education and Pedagogy
- Keywords
- artificial intelligence in education, physical education, personalized learning, learner evaluation, sports applications, future of physical education, teacher expertise, educational technology
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
