A pragmatic controlled trial of forest bathing compared with compassionate mind training in the UK: impacts on self-reported wellbeing and heart rate variability
Open accessAbstract
Forest Bathing, where individuals use mindfulness to engage with nature, has been reported to increase heart rate variability and benefit wellbeing. To date, most Forest Bathing studies have been conducted in Asia. Accordingly, this paper reports the first pragmatic controlled trial of Forest Bathing in the United Kingdom, comparing Forest Bathing with a control comprising an established wellbeing intervention also known to increase heart rate variability called Compassionate Mind Training. Sixty-one university staff and students (50 females, 11 males) were allocated to (i) Forest Bathing, (ii) Compassionate Mind Training or (iii) Forest Bathing combined with Compassionate Mind Training. Wellbeing and heart rate variability were measured at baseline, post-intervention and three-months follow-up. There were improvements in positive emotions, mood disturbance, rumination, nature connection and compassion and 57% of participants showed an increase in heart rate variability. There were no significant differences between conditions, showing that Forest Bathing had equivalence with an established wellbeing intervention. The findings will help healthcare providers and policy makers to understand the effects of Forest Bathing and implement it as a feasible social prescription to improve wellbeing. Future research needs to involve clinical populations and to assess the effects of Forest Bathing in a fully powered randomised controlled trial.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
A pragmatic-controlled trial of forest bathing reported improvements in positive emotions, nature connection and compassion, but only 57% of participants displayed an increase in HRV.
“A recently published pragmatic-controlled trial of “forest bathing” (McEwan et al., 2021) reported improvements in positive emotions, nature connection and compassion, but interestingly, only 57% of participants displayed an increase in HRV.”
From The Complex Construct of Wellbeing and the Role of Vagal Function (2022) · cites this paper as McEwan et al., 2021
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 43 · Cited by 65
- Authors
- McEwan, K., Giles, D., Clarke, F. J., Kotera, Y., Evans, G., Terebenina, O., Minou, L., Teeling, C., Basran, J., Wood, W., & Weil, D.
- Affiliations
- University of Derby (GB)
- Lattice Coaching and Training, Chesterfield S41 9AT, UK
- University of Birmingham (GB)
- Human Sciences Research Centre, University of Derby, Derby DE22 1GB, UK
- The Forest Bathing Institute, London WC2H 9JQ, UK
- Grow Outside CIC, Cambridge CB22 3GN, UK
- Dominic Weil, Sheffield, S2 5AS, UK
- Corresponding author
- McEwan, Kirsten
- Venue
- Sustainability
- Publisher
- MDPI AG
- Published
- 2021-01-28
- Volume
- 13
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 1380
- ISSN
- 2071-1050 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W3125927663
- Cited by
- 65
- References
- 43
- Citations by year
- 2026: 8 · 2025: 14 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 18 · 2021: 5
- FWCI
- 4.27
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Sustainability (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
- University of Derby Online Research Archive. (University of Derby) (submittedVersion)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis › Urban Green Space and Health
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Mindfulness and Compassion Interventions
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Heart Rate Variability and Autonomic Control
- Keywords
- forest bathing, compassionate mind training, heart rate variability, well-being, mindfulness, nature connection, positive emotions, mood disturbance, rumination, compassion, social prescribing, university students, university employees
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review