Cited by 22Food Waste Reduction and SustainabilityWaste Management and RecyclingAgriculture Sustainability and Environmental Impact

A Hierarchical Pyramid for Food Waste Based on a Social Innovation Perspective

Open access
Lombardi, Mariarosaria, Costantino, Marco·2021·Sustainability

Abstract

Food waste (FW) represents one of the greatest concerns facing mankind today; thus, the UN Agenda 2030 for Sustainable Development establishes that it must be halved by 2030. European Union legislators have taken part in this debate by publishing Directive 2018/851 to monitor the FW reduction goals, according to the waste hierarchical pyramid approach. At present, there are several proposed FW hierarchical pyramids, but these do not regard the associations between the level of waste-tackling strategies and social innovation (SI) models. Thus, the paper aims to build a hierarchical pyramid that considers, for each step of the food-supply chain and each level of the pyramid, all the FW social innovation models. A qualitative analysis of academic studies, institutional documents, and specific projects has been conducted. The results confirm the gap in the scientific literature and the lack of a systematic classification of SI activities to reduce FW. Furthermore, current SI practices are actually more focused on the human reuse of FW than on prevention, whereas SI models based on prevention might return the FWL issue to its systematic dimension. This information will help policymakers to reconsider the structural causes of FW inside the agro-food system, and not only its final consequences.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3390/su13094661

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Saudis are more likely to express extrinsic religiosity and less likely to express intrinsic religiosity due to other factors such as culture or social pressure.

    “This also means that Saudis are more likely to express extrinsic religiosity and less likely to express intrinsic religiosity due to other factors such as culture or social pressure [76,77].”

    From The Impact of Religiosity and Food Consumption Culture on Food Waste Intention in Saudi Arabia (2021) · cites this paper as [77]

    The paper’s Final Considerations and Conclusions discuss social innovation and food-waste reduction, not religious orientation among Saudis. Searches for intrinsic and extrinsic religiosity, Saudis, and cultural or social pressure found no passage addressing the claim. (LLM, conf=0.78)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 72 · Cited by 22

Research works printed but not linked: 16

  1. Kavitha, S.; Yukesh, K.R.; Gopalakrishnan, K.; Gunasekaran, M.; Banu, R.J. Chapter 1-Introduction: Sources and characterization of food waste and food industry wastes. In Food Waste to Valuable Resources, 1st ed.;
  2. Shukla, P.R., Skea, J., Buendia, E.C., Masson-Delmotte, V., Pörtner, H.-O., Roberts, D.C., Zhai, P., Slade, R., Connors, S., van Diemen, R., et al., Eds.; IPCC: Geneva, Switzerland, 2019; pp. 77-129. Available online: https://www.ipcc.ch/site/assets/uploads/sites/4/2019/12/04_Chapter-1.pdf (accessed on 23 August 2020).
  3. FAO. Global Food Losses and Food Waste-Extent, Causes and Prevention; FAO: Rome, Italy, 2011; pp. 1-37. Available online: http://www.fao.org/3/a-i2697e.pdf (accessed on 15 April 2020).
  4. EU. Directive 2008/98/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 19 November 2008 on Waste and Repealing Certain Directives. Official Journal of the European Union L312: 3-30. Available online: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/ TXT/?uri=CELEX:32008L0098 (accessed on 17 September 2020).
  5. Costantino, L. La Problematica Degli Sprechi Nella Filiera Agroalimentare. Profili Introduttivi; Università degli Studi di Bari "Aldo Moro"-Collana del Dipartimento Jonico in "Sistemi Giuridici ed Economici del Mediterraneo: Società, Ambiente, Culture"; Cacucci Editore: Bari, Italy, 2018; pp. 1-152. ISBN 9788866116806.
  6. European Commission. Commission Delegated Decision (EU) 2019/1597 of 3 May 2019 Supplementing Directive 2008/98/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council as Regards a Common Methodology and Minimum Quality Requirements for the Uniform Measurement of Levels of Food Waste. Official Journal of the European Union L 248/77-85. Available online: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=uriserv%3AOJ.L_.2019.248.01.0077.01.ENG (accessed on 17 September 2020).
  7. UNEP. Food Waste Index Report 2021; United Nations Environment Programme: Nairobi, Kenya, 2021; pp. 1-100. Available online: https://unep.org/resources/report/unep-food-waste-index-report-2021 (accessed on 8 April 2021).
  8. Lombardi, M. L'innovazione sociale nel settore agricolo del Mezzogiorno; FrancoAngeli: Milano, Italy, 2017; pp. 1-160.
  9. Papargyropoulou, E.; Lozano, R.; Steinberger, J.K.; Wright, N.; bin Ujang, Z. The food waste hierarchy as a framework for the management of food surplus and food waste. J. Clean. Prod. 2014, 76, 106-115.
  10. Di Terlizzi, B.; Van Otterdijk, R.; Dragotta, A.; Pink, P.; El Bilali, H. Chapter 12-Innovation for the reduction of food losses and waste. In Mediterra 2016 "Zero Waste in the Mediterranean: Natural Resources, Food and Knowledge"; International Centre for Advanced Mediterranean Agronomic Studies (CIHEAM) and Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO); Presses des Sciences Po: Paris, France, 2016; pp. 281-301.
  11. Thirapongphaiboon, N. The Power of Social Enterprises in Encouraging Food Sustainability Transitions in Consumerism Towards Food Waste Reduction in the UK, Denmark, and the Netherlands: Concept, Framework and Applicable Practices for Social Entrepreneurs. Master's Thesis, University of London Institute for Creative and Cultural Entrepreneurship, London, UK, 2018.
  12. Thompson, P., Kaplan, D., Eds.; Springer: Dordrecht, The Netherlands, 2016. [CrossRef] · DOI
  13. Yamakawa, H.; Williams, I.D.; Shaw, P.J.; Watanabe, K. Food waste prevention: Lessons from the Love Food, Hate Waste campaign in the UK, 2017. In Proceedings of the Sixteenth International Waste Management and Landfill Symposium, S. Margherita di Pula, Cagliari, Italy, 2-6 October 2017; CISA: Sardinia, Italy, 2017. Available online: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/320331 025_Food_waste_prevention_lessons_from_the_Love_Food_Hate_Waste_campaign_in_the_UK (accessed on 28 May 2020).
  14. Midgley, J. Surplus Food Redistribution. In Routledge Handbook of Food Waste, 1st ed.;
  15. Barnard, A.V.; Mourad, M. From Dumpster Dives to Disco Vibes-The shifting shape of food waste activism. In Routledge Handbook of Food Waste, 1st ed.;
  16. Platt, B.; MsSweeney, J.; Davis, J. Growing Local Fertility: A Guide to Community Composting; Highfields Center for Composting; The Institute for Local Self-Reliance: Hardwick, VT, USA, 2014; pp. 1-121. Available online: https://ilsr.org/wp-content/uploads/20 14/07/growing-local-fertility.pdf (accessed on 28 July 2020).

Authors
Lombardi, M., & Costantino, M.
Affiliations
  • University of Foggia (IT)
  • APS Farina 080 Onlus, 70121 Bari, Italy
Corresponding author
Lombardi, Mariarosaria
Venue
Sustainability
Publisher
MDPI AG
Published
2021-04-22
Volume
13
Issue
9
Pages
4661
ISSN
2071-1050 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3156275377
Cited by
22
References
72
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 3
FWCI
2.54
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Sustainability (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Food Waste Reduction and Sustainability
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Waste Management and Disposal › Waste Management and Recycling
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Agriculture Sustainability and Environmental Impact
Keywords
food waste, social innovation, waste hierarchy, food waste reduction, food supply chain, food waste prevention, food waste reuse, agri-food systems, SDG 12

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review