Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 78

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 135 of the 135 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Recently Developed Adsorbing Materials for Fluoride Removal from Water and Fluoride Analytical Determination Techniques: A Review

Tolkou, Athanasia K., Manousi, Natalia, Zachariadis, George A., Katsoyiannis, Ioannis A., Deliyanni, Eleni A.·2021·Sustainability

Abstract

In recent years, there has been an increase in public perception of the detrimental side-effects of fluoride to human health due to its effects on teeth and bones. Today, there is a plethora of techniques available for the removal of fluoride from drinking water. Among them, adsorption is a very prospective method because of its handy operation, cost efficiency, and high selectivity. Along with efforts to assist fluoride removal from drinking waters, extensive attention has been also paid to the accurate measurement of fluoride in water. Currently, the analytical methods that are used for fluoride determination can be classified into chromatographic methods (e.g., ionic chromatography), electrochemical methods (e.g., voltammetry, potentiometry, and polarography), spectroscopic methods (e.g., molecular absorption spectrometry), microfluidic analysis (e.g., flow injection analysis and sequential injection analysis), titration, and sensors. In this review article, we discuss the available techniques and the ongoing effort for achieving enhanced fluoride removal by applying novel adsorbents such as carbon-based materials (i.e., activated carbon, graphene oxide, and carbon nanotubes) and nanostructured materials, combining metals and their oxides or hydroxides as well as natural materials. Emphasis has been given to the use of lanthanum (La) in the modification of materials, both activated carbon and hybrid materials (i.e., La/Mg/Si-AC, La/MA, LaFeO3 NPs), and in the use of MgO nanostructures, which are found to exhibit an adsorption capacity of up to 29,131 mg g−1. The existing analytical methodologies and the current trends in analytical chemistry for fluoride determination in drinking water are also discussed.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3390/su13137061

Cites

135 of 135 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Figures

Figure 1 Commonly applied techniques for fluoride removal from drinking water [16-19].
Figure 1 Commonly applied techniques for fluoride removal from drinking water [16-19].CC-BY · From the PDF
Figure 2 Schematic presentation of modified activated carbon-based materials used for fluoride removal, showing ( a ) the pH optimum activity, ( b ) the maximum adsorption capacity, and ( c ) the contact time of adsorption.
Figure 2 Schematic presentation of modified activated carbon-based materials used for fluoride removal, showing ( a ) the pH optimum activity, ( b ) the maximum adsorption capacity, and ( c ) the contact time of adsorption.CC-BY · From the PDF
Figure 3 Schematic graph of depicting maximum adsorption capacities (mg g -1 ) of presented activated carbon-based materials.
Figure 3 Schematic graph of depicting maximum adsorption capacities (mg g -1 ) of presented activated carbon-based materials.CC-BY · From the PDF
Figure 4 Schematic presentation of modified graphene oxide-based materials used for fluoride removal showing ( a ) the optimu pH optimum, ( b ) the maximum adsorption capacities, and ( c ) the contact time of adsorption.
Figure 4 Schematic presentation of modified graphene oxide-based materials used for fluoride removal showing ( a ) the optimu pH optimum, ( b ) the maximum adsorption capacities, and ( c ) the contact time of adsorption.CC-BY · From the PDF
Figure 5 Schematic graph of depicting maximum adsorption capacities (mg g -1 ) of presented graphene oxide-based materials.
Figure 5 Schematic graph of depicting maximum adsorption capacities (mg g -1 ) of presented graphene oxide-based materials.CC-BY · From the PDF
Image 6
CC-BY · From the PDF
Figure 7 Schematic presentation of the four most efficient presented materials used for fluoride removal, showing the modification type, ( a ) the pH optimum activity, ( b ) the maximum adsorption capacities and the contact time ( c ) of adsorption.
Figure 7 Schematic presentation of the four most efficient presented materials used for fluoride removal, showing the modification type, ( a ) the pH optimum activity, ( b ) the maximum adsorption capacities and the contact time ( c ) of adsorption.CC-BY · From the PDF
Figure 8 Schematic graph depicting maximum adsorption capacities (mg g -1 ) of the four most efficient presented materials.
Figure 8 Schematic graph depicting maximum adsorption capacities (mg g -1 ) of the four most efficient presented materials.CC-BY · From the PDF
Figure 9 Analytical techniques for the determination of fluoride in drinking water.
Figure 9 Analytical techniques for the determination of fluoride in drinking water.CC-BY · From the PDF

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 135 references

Metadata

Authors
Tolkou, A. K., Manousi, N., Zachariadis, G. A., Katsoyiannis, I. A., & Deliyanni, E. A.
Venue
Sustainability
Publisher
MDPI AG
Published
2021-06-23
Volume
13
Issue
13
Pages
7061
ISSN
2071-1050
Cited by
78
References
135
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Recently Developed Adsorbing Materials for Fluoride Removal from Water and Fluoride Analytical Determination Techniques: A Review. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.3390/su13137061
The paper
Tolkou, A. K., Manousi, N., Zachariadis, G. A., Katsoyiannis, I. A., & Deliyanni, E. A. (2021). Recently Developed Adsorbing Materials for Fluoride Removal from Water and Fluoride Analytical Determination Techniques: A Review. Sustainability. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13137061

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.