A Systematic Review of the Impact of Physical Activity on Cognitive and Noncognitive Development in Chinese University Students
Open accessAbstract
A large volume of empirical evidence and literature reviews on physical activity have concentrated on primary and secondary education. Thus, the primary aim of this systematic review is to synthesize empirical evidence regarding the potential impact of physical activity on academic and nonacademic performance among Chinese university students. A search and analysis of studies was conducted in accordance with the PRISMA guidelines by using an electronic database search (PubMed, Science Direct, and Scopus), and 150 studies were obtained. Subsequently, after producing rigorous inclusion and exclusion criteria, which were used to consider quality, methodology, language, geographical location, year of publication, etc., a total of 11 quantitative research articles, based on Chinese higher education institutions, were chosen for synthesis. The comprehensive analysis of the studies affirmed that physical activity dramatically benefits university students by fostering their nonacademic skills, such as social relatedness, life satisfaction, and mental health, in addition to boosting their academic achievement in terms of graduation, GPA, academic motivation, and engagement. However, the aim of this systematic review was to provide implications for future scholars to explicitly study university students’ educational level, discipline, sex, and type of physical activity.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Trott et al. (2024) and H. Zhang et al. (2023) confirmed significant anxiety reductions and modest academic gains associated with physical activity, although high heterogeneity and low methodological quality persisted.
“Trott et al. (2024) and H. Zhang et al. (2023), confirmed significant anxiety reductions and modest academic gains associated with physical activity, although high heterogeneity and low methodological quality persisted.”
From Anxiety, Academic Performance, and Physical Activity in University Students: A Scoping Review (2025) · cites this paper as H. Zhang et al. (2023)
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 36 · Cited by 9
- Authors
- Zhang, H., Qin, Y., Khalid, S., Tadesse, E., & Gao, C.
- Affiliations
- Guangzhou Sport University (CN)
- City University of Macau (MO)
- Zhejiang Normal University (CN)
- Shenzhen University (CN)
- Corresponding author
- Gao, Chunhai
- Venue
- Sustainability
- Publisher
- MDPI AG
- Published
- 2023-01-30
- Volume
- 15
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 2438
- ISSN
- 2071-1050 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W4318475964
- Cited by
- 9
- References
- 36
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 2
- FWCI
- 0.32
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Sustainability (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Physical Activity and Health
- Social Sciences › Life-span and Life-course Studies › Sports and Physical Education Studies
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation › Physical Education and Pedagogy
- Keywords
- physical activity, university students, cognitive development, academic performance, academic motivation, mental health, life satisfaction, social relatedness, Chinese higher education
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review