Cited by 9Physical Activity and HealthSports and Physical Education StudiesPhysical Education and Pedagogy

A Systematic Review of the Impact of Physical Activity on Cognitive and Noncognitive Development in Chinese University Students

Open access
Zhang, Hanying, Qin, Yuke, Khalid, Sabika, Tadesse, Endale, Gao, Chunhai·2023·Sustainability

Abstract

A large volume of empirical evidence and literature reviews on physical activity have concentrated on primary and secondary education. Thus, the primary aim of this systematic review is to synthesize empirical evidence regarding the potential impact of physical activity on academic and nonacademic performance among Chinese university students. A search and analysis of studies was conducted in accordance with the PRISMA guidelines by using an electronic database search (PubMed, Science Direct, and Scopus), and 150 studies were obtained. Subsequently, after producing rigorous inclusion and exclusion criteria, which were used to consider quality, methodology, language, geographical location, year of publication, etc., a total of 11 quantitative research articles, based on Chinese higher education institutions, were chosen for synthesis. The comprehensive analysis of the studies affirmed that physical activity dramatically benefits university students by fostering their nonacademic skills, such as social relatedness, life satisfaction, and mental health, in addition to boosting their academic achievement in terms of graduation, GPA, academic motivation, and engagement. However, the aim of this systematic review was to provide implications for future scholars to explicitly study university students’ educational level, discipline, sex, and type of physical activity.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3390/su15032438

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Trott et al. (2024) and H. Zhang et al. (2023) confirmed significant anxiety reductions and modest academic gains associated with physical activity, although high heterogeneity and low methodological quality persisted.

    “Trott et al. (2024) and H. Zhang et al. (2023), confirmed significant anxiety reductions and modest academic gains associated with physical activity, although high heterogeneity and low methodological quality persisted.”

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 36 · Cited by 9

Authors
Zhang, H., Qin, Y., Khalid, S., Tadesse, E., & Gao, C.
Affiliations
  • Guangzhou Sport University (CN)
  • City University of Macau (MO)
  • Zhejiang Normal University (CN)
  • Shenzhen University (CN)
Corresponding author
Gao, Chunhai
Venue
Sustainability
Publisher
MDPI AG
Published
2023-01-30
Volume
15
Issue
3
Pages
2438
ISSN
2071-1050 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4318475964
Cited by
9
References
36
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 2
FWCI
0.32
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Sustainability (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Physical Activity and Health
  • Social Sciences › Life-span and Life-course Studies › Sports and Physical Education Studies
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation › Physical Education and Pedagogy
Keywords
physical activity, university students, cognitive development, academic performance, academic motivation, mental health, life satisfaction, social relatedness, Chinese higher education

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review