Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 18

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 41 of the 41 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Land–Sea Interactions: A Spatial Planning Perspective

Innocenti, Alberto, Musco, Francesco·2023·Sustainability
DOI 10.3390/su15129446
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Coastal areas are the most populated areas on the planet and are the most attractive areas due to the richness of the biodiversity, natural resources, and trading reasons. Coastal cities are enlarging their boundaries fast by reclaiming land to place new growing economic sectors such as tourism, oil and gas, aquaculture, and fishery. These processes will put an extra strain on the interactions between land and sea. A crucial initiative regarding Land–Sea Interactions comes from the European Union through Directive 2014/89/EU. The directive pays special attention to the discourse surrounding Land–Sea Interactions. This study aims to analyze the existing research on Land–Sea Interactions to develop a base knowledge to determine elements and interactions with a spatial planning perspective. The research is based on a double literature review, a systematic literature review based on an open-source database, and a bibliographic search based on a key Land–Sea Interactions paper. The results identify economic sectors, natural elements, and their functions in the discourse of Land–Sea Interaction. Furthermore, this study identifies shared features and terminologies to define Land–Sea Interactions clearly. The main conclusion is that Land–Sea Interactions are human-induced and, in most cases, happen from land to sea, not vice versa. The other crucial conclusion is that specific types of natural elements can decrease the negative impact that those interactions can have either on the environment or among other human activities.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3390/su15129446

Cites

41 of 41 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Figures

Figure 1 Methodology scheme of the systematic literature review applied in the paper.
Figure 1 Methodology scheme of the systematic literature review applied in the paper.CC-BY · From the PDF
Figure 2 Methodology scheme of the bibliographic search of key LSI paper applied in the research.
Figure 2 Methodology scheme of the bibliographic search of key LSI paper applied in the research.CC-BY · From the PDF
Figure 4 This figure shows the diversity of the research fields of the article analyzed in the double literature reviews.
Figure 4 This figure shows the diversity of the research fields of the article analyzed in the double literature reviews.CC-BY · From the PDF
Figure 5 This figure shows the distribution of the case studies of the 21 articles reviewed.
Figure 5 This figure shows the distribution of the case studies of the 21 articles reviewed.CC-BY · From the PDF
Image 5
CC-BY · From the PDF
Image 6
CC-BY · From the PDF

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Kolman, 2012, New land in the water economically and socially land reclamation pays, Terra Aqua, 128, 6
  2. Hartwig, H., Kremer, B.G., and Kannen, A. (2009). Risk and Management of Current and Future Storm Surges, Springer.

Cited by

See all 18

Metadata

Authors
Innocenti, A., & Musco, F.
Affiliations
  • Department of Technology and Innovation, University of Southern Denmark, 5230 Odense, Denmark
  • Department of Architecture and Arts, University Iuav of Venice, 30135 Venice, Italy
ORCID
Venue
Sustainability
Publisher
MDPI AG
Published
2023-06-12
Volume
15
Issue
12
Pages
9446
ISSN
2071-1050
DOI
10.3390/su15129446
Cited by
18
References
41
Language
en
Licence
creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (vor)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.