The DOI matches its Crossref record; 51 of the 51 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Integrating Absolute Sustainability and Social Sustainability in the Digital Product Passport to Promote Industry 5.0
Open accessAbstract
The establishment of the digital product passport is regarded to be a prominent tool to promote environmental and social sustainability, thus enabling the transition towards Industry 5.0. In this way, it represents a holistic tool for the decision-making process of several actors of a product’s value chain. However, its development is still ongoing and the absolute perspective of environmental sustainability and the social sustainability have been overlooked. The present work aims to fill these gaps and complement the literature currently available on the digital product passport with a threefold purpose. Firstly, by referring to social life cycle assessment methodologies, useful social indicators to include in the digital product passport are discussed and proposed. Secondly, the need for an absolute perspective of environmental sustainability that respects the natural limits of our planet is presented; based on the LCA methodology and the Planetary Boundaries framework, environmental attributes and environmental impact indicators with the corresponding threshold are proposed to be included in the passport and enable the so-called absolute environmental sustainability assessment of products. Finally, a framework based on a cyber-physical system for filling in the digital product passport throughout a product lifecycle is conceived. This work represents an example of how the hallmark technologies of Industry 4.0 can be used towards Industry 5.0.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“For example, MPs can provide access to life cycle analysis data associated with an object, offering insights into circularity characteristics such as life cycle costing information (Mazzoli et al., 2022) or environmental sustainability assessment indicators (Panza, Bruno, & Lombardi, 2023).”
From Digital material passports in the AEC industry: a scoping review and conceptualisation of future research challenges (2025) · cites this paper as Panza, Bruno, & Lombardi, 2023
The check wasn’t confident either way, so it gives no verdict — never disputed.
In the citing paper
“In terms of adoption timeframes, not all socio-cultural implementation challenges are framed within a longer-term vision -for example, some publications argue for shorter term initial steps, such as the immediate need for increased awareness of MPs and their benefits (Honic et al., 2019d;Panza et al., 2023;van Capelleveen et al., 2023).”
From Digital material passports in the AEC industry: a scoping review and conceptualisation of future research challenges (2025) · cites this paper as Panza et al., 2023
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
A safe operating space for humanity
Rockström, J., Steffen, W., Noone, K., Persson, Å., Chapin, F. S., Lambin, E. F., Lenton, T. M., Scheffer, M., Folke, C., Schellnhuber, H. J., et al. (2009) · Nature · doi:10.1038/461472a · Cited by 13,333
Planetary boundaries: Guiding human development on a changing planet
Steffen, W., Richardson, K., Rockström, J., Cornell, S. E., Fetzer, I., Bennett, E. M., Biggs, R., Carpenter, S. R., de Vries, W., de Wit, C. A., et al. (2015) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1259855 · Cited by 12,527
A Cyber-Physical Systems architecture for Industry 4.0-based manufacturing systems
Lee, J., Bagheri, B., & Kao, H.-A. (2015) · Manufacturing Letters · doi:10.1016/j.mfglet.2014.12.001 · Cited by 5,113
Literature review of Industry 4.0 and related technologies
Oztemel, E., & Gursev, S. (2020) · Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing · doi:10.1007/s10845-018-1433-8 · Cited by 2,143
Outside the Safe Operating Space of the Planetary Boundary for Novel Entities
Persson, L., Carney Almroth, B. M., Collins, C. D., Cornell, S., de Wit, C. A., Diamond, M. L., Fantke, P., Hassellöv, M., MacLeod, M., Ryberg, M. W., et al. (2022) · Environmental Science & Technology · doi:10.1021/acs.est.1c04158 · Cited by 1,347
Zheng, T., Ardolino, M., Bacchetti, A., & Perona, M. (2020) · International Journal of Production Research · doi:10.1080/00207543.2020.1824085 · Cited by 744
Treiblmaier, H. (2018) · Supply Chain Management · doi:10.1108/scm-01-2018-0029 · Cited by 737
Blockchain technology for bridging trust, traceability and transparency in circular supply chain
Centobelli, P., Cerchione, R., del Vecchio, P., Oropallo, E., & Secundo, G. (2021) · Information Manager (The) · doi:10.1016/j.im.2021.103508 · Cited by 729
Blockchain and the circular economy: potential tensions and critical reflections from practice
Kouhizadeh, M., Zhu, Q., & Sarkis, J. (2019) · Production Planning & Control · doi:10.1080/09537287.2019.1695925 · Cited by 538
Rusch, M., Schöggl, J., & Baumgartner, R. J. (2022) · Business Strategy and the Environment · doi:10.1002/bse.3099 · Cited by 429
Research works printed but not linked: 3
- Müller, J. (2020). Enabling Technologies for Industry 5.0: Results of a workshop with Europe’s technology leaders. Eur. Comm., 19.
- Fontes, J. (2018). Handbook for Product Social Impact Assessment 2018, Springer.
- Ashby, M.F. (2020). Materials and the Environment, Elsevier. [3rd ed.].
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Voulgaridis, K., Λάγκας, Θ., Angelopoulos, C. M., Boulogeorgos, A. A., Argyriou, V., & Sarigiannidis, P. G. (2024) · Telecommunication Systems · doi:10.1007/s11235-024-01104-x · Cited by 178
Green human resource management and work engagement: Linking HRM performance attributions
Gupta, A., & Jangra, S. (2024) · Sustainable Futures · doi:10.1016/j.sftr.2024.100174 · Cited by 130
Wan, P. K., & Jiang, S. (2025) · Sustainable Production and Consumption · doi:10.1016/j.spc.2025.01.014 · Cited by 88
Digital Product Passport: A Review and Research Agenda
Lopes, C., & Barata, J. (2024) · Procedia Computer Science · doi:10.1016/j.procs.2024.09.517 · Cited by 75
Life-Cycle Assessment in Agri-Food Systems and the Wine Industry—A Circular Economy Perspective
Marques, C., Güneş, S., Vilela, A., & Gomes, R. (2025) · Foods · doi:10.3390/foods14091553 · Cited by 76
Metadata
- Authors
- Panza, L., Bruno, G., & Lombardi, F.
- Affiliations
- Politecnico di Torino (IT)
- Corresponding author
- Bruno, Giulia
- Venue
- Sustainability
- Publisher
- MDPI AG
- Published
- 2023-08-18
- Volume
- 15
- Issue
- 16
- Pages
- 12552
- ISSN
- 2071-1050 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W4385979354
- Cited by
- 72
- References
- 51
- Citations by year
- 2026: 20 · 2025: 33 · 2024: 17 · 2023: 2
- FWCI
- 6.01
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Sustainability (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PORTO@Iris (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Engineering › Environmental Impact and Sustainability
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Sustainable Supply Chain Management
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering › Digital Transformation in Industry
- Keywords
- digital product passport, Industry 5.0, social sustainability, environmental sustainability, social life cycle assessment, social indicators, planetary boundaries, environmental impact indicators, cyber-physical systems, product life cycle, Industry 4.0 technologies, product value chain
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
