Cited by 0Composting and Vermicomposting TechniquesSoil Carbon and Nitrogen DynamicsAgricultural Science and Fertilization

Co-Adding Biochar and Zeolite to Chicken Manure Compost: Nutrient Retention, Humification, and Bacterial Community Responses

Open access
Liu, Yue, Liu, Xiaoyan, Wan, Tian, Zhang, Yong, Ning, Maomao, Cheng, Wen, Ren, Jiehui, Wang, Min·2026·Sustainability

Abstract

Compost instability and low nutrient content remain the primary constraints on the resource utilization of livestock manure compost. Although biochar and zeolite have individually demonstrated ameliorative effects, their combined application and the associated microbial mechanisms remain insufficiently understood. This study ran a 35-day composting trial with four treatments, which were a no-amendment control (CK); amended with 10% biochar (w/w, dry weight basis, T1); amended with 10% zeolite (w/w, dry weight basis, T2); and amended with 5% biochar plus 5% zeolite (w/w, dry weight basis, T3). The T3 group achieved an average thermophilic temperature of 58.37 °C, sustained a thermophilic phase for 10 days, and had the highest seed germination index (118.31%), exceeding those of the other groups. This group maintained higher observed total phosphorus and total potassium concentrations at compost maturity. It also presented a higher NH4+-N concentration (410.00 mg/kg DM). Humic acid climbed to 57.67 g/kg DM by day 35. Microbial analysis showed that Actinobacteriota made up 60.54% of the bacterial community in T3, almost twice the share in CK (32.97%). These observational results indicate that biochar–zeolite co-addition provided complementary benefits for improving compost maturity and nutrient concentrations, offering a practical strategy for sustainable chicken manure management.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3390/su18189312

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 41

Authors
Liu, Y., Liu, X., Wan, T., Zhang, Y., Ning, M., Cheng, W., Ren, J., & Wang, M.
Affiliations
  • Xi'an University of Technology (CN)
  • Xi’an Fifth Reclaimed Water Plant, No.2 Xuefu Middle Road, Xi’an 710021, China
Corresponding author
Wan, Tian
Venue
Sustainability
Publisher
MDPI AG
Published
2026-09-10
Volume
18
Issue
18
Pages
9312
ISSN
2071-1050 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W7212124880
Cited by
0
References
41
FWCI
0.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
Sustainability (publishedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
Natural Science Basic Research Program of Shaanxi Province (2025JC-YBMS-593)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Soil Science › Composting and Vermicomposting Techniques
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Soil Science › Soil Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Soil Science › Agricultural Science and Fertilization
Keywords
biochar, zeolites, chicken manure compost, compost stabilization, nutrient retention, humification, humic acid, compost maturity, thermophilic phase, ammonia nitrogen, phosphorus and potassium, bacterial communities, Actinobacteriota, germination index, livestock manure management

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review