Co-Adding Biochar and Zeolite to Chicken Manure Compost: Nutrient Retention, Humification, and Bacterial Community Responses
Open accessAbstract
Compost instability and low nutrient content remain the primary constraints on the resource utilization of livestock manure compost. Although biochar and zeolite have individually demonstrated ameliorative effects, their combined application and the associated microbial mechanisms remain insufficiently understood. This study ran a 35-day composting trial with four treatments, which were a no-amendment control (CK); amended with 10% biochar (w/w, dry weight basis, T1); amended with 10% zeolite (w/w, dry weight basis, T2); and amended with 5% biochar plus 5% zeolite (w/w, dry weight basis, T3). The T3 group achieved an average thermophilic temperature of 58.37 °C, sustained a thermophilic phase for 10 days, and had the highest seed germination index (118.31%), exceeding those of the other groups. This group maintained higher observed total phosphorus and total potassium concentrations at compost maturity. It also presented a higher NH4+-N concentration (410.00 mg/kg DM). Humic acid climbed to 57.67 g/kg DM by day 35. Microbial analysis showed that Actinobacteriota made up 60.54% of the bacterial community in T3, almost twice the share in CK (32.97%). These observational results indicate that biochar–zeolite co-addition provided complementary benefits for improving compost maturity and nutrient concentrations, offering a practical strategy for sustainable chicken manure management.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 41
- Authors
- Liu, Y., Liu, X., Wan, T., Zhang, Y., Ning, M., Cheng, W., Ren, J., & Wang, M.
- Affiliations
- Xi'an University of Technology (CN)
- Xi’an Fifth Reclaimed Water Plant, No.2 Xuefu Middle Road, Xi’an 710021, China
- Corresponding author
- Wan, Tian
- Venue
- Sustainability
- Publisher
- MDPI AG
- Published
- 2026-09-10
- Volume
- 18
- Issue
- 18
- Pages
- 9312
- ISSN
- 2071-1050 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W7212124880
- Cited by
- 0
- References
- 41
- FWCI
- 0.00
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Sustainability (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- Funders
- Natural Science Basic Research Program of Shaanxi Province (2025JC-YBMS-593)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Soil Science › Composting and Vermicomposting Techniques
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Soil Science › Soil Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Soil Science › Agricultural Science and Fertilization
- Keywords
- biochar, zeolites, chicken manure compost, compost stabilization, nutrient retention, humification, humic acid, compost maturity, thermophilic phase, ammonia nitrogen, phosphorus and potassium, bacterial communities, Actinobacteriota, germination index, livestock manure management
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review