The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Identifying Social Impacts in Product Supply Chains:Overview and Application of the Social Hotspot Database
Open accessAbstract
One emerging tool to measure the social-related impacts in supply chains is Social Life Cycle Assessment (S-LCA), a derivative of the well-established environmental LCA technique. LCA has recently started to gain popularity among large corporations and initiatives, such as The Sustainability Consortium or the Sustainable Apparel Coalition. Both have made the technique a cornerstone of their applied-research program. The Social Hotspots Database (SHDB) is an overarching, global database that eases the data collection burden in S-LCA studies. Proposed “hotspots” are production activities or unit processes (also defined as country-specific sectors) in the supply chain that may be at risk for social issues to be present. The SHDB enables efficient application of S-LCA by allowing users to prioritize production activities for which site-specific data collection is most desirable. Data for three criteria are used to inform prioritization: (1) labor intensity in worker hours per unit process and (2) risk for, or opportunity to affect, relevant social themes or sub-categories related to Human Rights, Labor Rights and Decent Work, Governance and Access to Community Services (3) gravity of a social issue. The Worker Hours Model was developed using a global input/output economic model and wage rate data. Nearly 200 reputable sources of statistical data have been used to develop 20 Social Theme Tables by country and sector. This paper presents an overview of the SHDB development and features, as well as results from a pilot study conducted on strawberry yogurt. This study, one of seven Social Scoping Assessments mandated by The Sustainability Consortium, identifies the potential social hotspots existing in the supply chain of strawberry yogurt. With this knowledge, companies that manufacture or sell yogurt can refine their data collection efforts in order to put their social responsibility performance in perspective and effectively set up programs and initiatives to improve the social conditions of production along their product supply chain.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Environmental impacts of food consumption and nutrition: Where are we and what is next?
Nemecek, T., Jungbluth, N., i Canals, L. M., & Schenck, R. (2016) · The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment · doi:10.1007/s11367-016-1071-3 · Cited by 219
Social life cycle assessment of palm oil biodiesel: a case study in Jambi Province of Indonesia
Manik, Y., Leahy, J., & Halog, A. (2013) · The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment · doi:10.1007/s11367-013-0581-5 · Cited by 209
Chhipi-Shrestha, G. K., Hewage, K., & Sadiq, R. (2015) · Clean Technologies and Environmental Policy · doi:10.1007/s10098-014-0841-5 · Cited by 156
Roos, S., Zamani, B., Sandin, G., Peters, G. M., & Svanström, M. (2016) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.05.146 · Cited by 140
Siebert, A., Bezama, A., O’Keeffe, S., & Thrän, D. (2018) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.02.146 · Cited by 135
Metadata
- Authors
- Benoit-Norris, C., Cavan, D. A., & Norris, G.
- Venue
- Sustainability
- Publisher
- MDPI AG
- Published
- 2012-08-24
- Volume
- 4
- Issue
- 9
- Pages
- 1946-1965
- ISSN
- 2071-1050 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2082947055
- Cited by
- 294
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 7.08
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Identifying Social Impacts in Product Supply Chains:Overview and Application of the Social Hotspot Database. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.3390/su4091946
- The paper
- Benoit-Norris, C., Cavan, D. A., & Norris, G. (2012). Identifying Social Impacts in Product Supply Chains:Overview and Application of the Social Hotspot Database. Sustainability. https://doi.org/10.3390/su4091946
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.