Cited by 179Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource ManagementForest Management and PolicyLand Rights and Reforms

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 69 of the 70 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Ten Years of REDD+: A Critical Review of the Impact of REDD+ on Forest-Dependent Communities

Open access
Bayrak, Mucahid, Marafa, Lawal·2016·Sustainability

Abstract

The Reducing Emissions from Deforestation and Forest Degradation program, or REDD+, has been the international community’s first real attempt to create a global forest governance system which would impact countries on national, regional and even local scales. This paper provides an in-depth analysis on the impact of REDD+ on forest-dependent communities. The dimensions which are included in this review are institutions and governance, livelihoods, socio-cultural aspects, and the environment. Many studies confirm that forest-dependent communities are not sufficiently involved in current REDD+ projects. Furthermore, current and potential impacts of REDD+ on communities often disrupt local peoples’ livelihoods and strategies, institutions and socio-cultural systems in various ways, such as unequal benefit sharing, food insecurity, introduction of new powerful stakeholders, illegal land acquisition, unfair free prior and informed consent, and the introduction of monoculture plantations. REDD+ is also perceived as a neoliberal mechanism which renegotiates peoples’ relationship with the natural environment by monetizing nature. The paper concludes with a framework which addresses the potential drivers and threats of REDD+ concerning forest-dependent communities based on the literature review. This framework suggests a holistic approach to REDD+ implementation, which incorporates forest-dependent communities’ often complex relationship with the natural environment, such as incorporation of traditional forest management systems and provision of viable alternatives to loss of agricultural land.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3390/su8070620

Cites

69 of 69 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 70 references

Research works printed but not linked: 5

  1. UN-REDD (2014, January 7–9). Fifth consolidated annual progress report of the UN-REDD programme fund. Proceedings of the UN-REDD Programme Twelfth Policy Board Meeting, Lima, Peru.
  2. Davis, C., Daviet, F., Nakhooda, S., and Thuault, A. (2009). A Review of 25 Readiness Plan Idea Notes from the World Bank Forest Carbon Partnership Facility, World Resources Institute.
  3. Lyster, R., MacKenzie, C., and McDermott, C. (2013). Law, Tropical Forests, and Carbon: The Case for REDD+, Cambridge University press. [1st ed.]. · DOI
  4. Sponsel, L.E., Headland, T.N., and Bailey, R.C. Tropical Deforestation: The Human Dimension, Columbia University Press.
  5. Lyster, R., MacKenzie, C., and McDermott, C. (2013). Law, Tropical Forests, and Carbon: The Case for REDD+, Cambridge University Press. [1st ed.]. · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Bayrak, M., & Marafa, L.
Affiliations
  • Harbin Institute of Technology (CN)
  • Chinese University of Hong Kong (HK)
Corresponding author
Marafa, Lawal
Venue
Sustainability
Publisher
MDPI AG
Published
2016-07-02
Volume
8
Issue
7
Pages
620
ISSN
2071-1050 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2473073106
Cited by
179
References
70
Citations by year
2026: 17 · 2025: 19 · 2024: 22 · 2023: 21 · 2022: 20 · 2021: 24 · 2020: 17 · 2019: 17 · 2018: 12 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 1
FWCI
9.64
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Sustainability (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • Utrecht University Repository (Utrecht University) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Funders
Worldwide Universities Network
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Forestry › Forest Management and Policy
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Soil Science › Land Rights and Reforms
Keywords
REDD+, forest-dependent communities, forest governance, livelihoods, free, prior and informed consent, benefit sharing, food insecurity, monoculture plantations, neoliberalism, traditional forest management, community participation, climate change mitigation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review