Cited by 41Traffic control and managementTraffic Prediction and Management TechniquesTransportation Planning and Optimization

Integration of Decentralized Graph-Based Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning with Digital Twin for Traffic Signal Optimization

Open access
Kumarasamy, Vijayalakshmi K., Saroj, Abhilasha Jairam, Liang, Yu, Wu, Dalei, Hunter, Michael P., Guin, Angshuman, Sartipi, Mina·2024·Symmetry

Abstract

Machine learning (ML) methods, particularly Reinforcement Learning (RL), have gained widespread attention for optimizing traffic signal control in intelligent transportation systems. However, existing ML approaches often exhibit limitations in scalability and adaptability, particularly within large traffic networks. This paper introduces an innovative solution by integrating decentralized graph-based multi-agent reinforcement learning (DGMARL) with a Digital Twin to enhance traffic signal optimization, targeting the reduction of traffic congestion and network-wide fuel consumption associated with vehicle stops and stop delays. In this approach, DGMARL agents are employed to learn traffic state patterns and make informed decisions regarding traffic signal control. The integration with a Digital Twin module further facilitates this process by simulating and replicating the real-time asymmetric traffic behaviors of a complex traffic network. The evaluation of this proposed methodology utilized PTV-Vissim, a traffic simulation software, which also serves as the simulation engine for the Digital Twin. The study focused on the Martin Luther King (MLK) Smart Corridor in Chattanooga, Tennessee, USA, by considering symmetric and asymmetric road layouts and traffic conditions. Comparative analysis against an actuated signal control baseline approach revealed significant improvements. Experiment results demonstrate a remarkable 55.38% reduction in Eco_PI, a developed performance measure capturing the cumulative impact of stops and penalized stop delays on fuel consumption, over a 24 h scenario. In a PM-peak-hour scenario, the average reduction in Eco_PI reached 38.94%, indicating the substantial improvement achieved in optimizing traffic flow and reducing fuel consumption during high-demand periods. These findings underscore the effectiveness of the integrated DGMARL and Digital Twin approach in optimizing traffic signals, contributing to a more sustainable and efficient traffic management system.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3390/sym16040448

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 76

  1. Journal, A. Tennessee DOT Starts Phase 2 of I-24 SMART Corridor. Available online: https://aashtojournal.org/2022/04/01 /tennessee-dot-starts-phase-2-of-i-24-smart-corridor/ (accessed on 1 June 2023).
  2. Wu, J.; Wang, X.; Dang, Y.; Lv, Z. Digital Twins and artificial intelligence in transportation infrastructure: Classification, application, and future research directions. Comput. Electr. Eng. 2022, 101, 107983. [CrossRef] · DOI
  3. Saroj, A.J.; Guin, A.; Hunter, M. Deep LSTM recurrent neural networks for arterial traffic volume data imputation. J. Big Data Anal. Transp. 2021, 3, 95-108. [CrossRef] · DOI
  4. Farazi, N.P.; Zou, B.; Ahamed, T.; Barua, L. Deep reinforcement learning in transportation research: A review. Transp. Res. Interdiscip. Perspect. 2021, 11, 100425.
  5. Chowdhury, M.; Sadek, A.W. Advantages and limitations of artificial intelligence. Artif. Intell. Appl. Crit. Transp. Issues 2012, 6, 360-375.
  6. Machin, M.; Sanguesa, J.A.; Garrido, P.; Martinez, F.J. On the use of artificial intelligence techniques in intelligent transportation systems. In Proceedings of the 2018 IEEE Wireless Communications and Networking Conference Workshops (WCNCW), Barcelona, Spain, 15-18 April 2018; pp. 332-337.
  7. Kumarasamy, V.K.; Saroj, A.J.; Liang, Y.; Wu, D.; Hunter, M.P.; Guin, A.; Sartipi, M. Traffic Signal Optimization by Integrating Reinforcement Learning and Digital Twins. In Proceedings of the 2023 IEEE Smart World Congress (SWC), Portsmouth, UK, 28-31 August 2023; pp. 1-8.
  8. Stevanovic, A.; Shayeb, S.A.; Patra, S.S. Fuel consumption intersection control Performance Index. Transp. Res. Rec. 2021, 2675, 690-702. [CrossRef] · DOI
  9. Alshayeb, S.; Stevanovic, A.; Effinger, J.R. Investigating impacts of various operational conditions on fuel consumption and stop penalty at signalized intersections. Int. J. Transp. Sci. Technol. 2022, 11, 690-710. [CrossRef] · DOI
  10. Stevanovic, A.; Dobrota, N. Impact of various operating conditions on simulated emissions-based stop penalty at signalized intersections. Sustainability 2021, 13, 10037. [CrossRef] · DOI
  11. Alshayeb, S.; Stevanovic, A.; Park, B.B. Field-based prediction models for stop penalty in traffic signal timing optimization. Energies 2021, 14, 7431. [CrossRef] · DOI
  12. Nia, N.G.; Amiri, A.; Nasab, A.; Kaplanoglu, E.; Liang, Y. The Power of ANN-Random Forest Algorithm in Human Activities Recognition Using IMU Data. In Proceedings of the 2023 IEEE EMBS International Conference on Biomedical and Health Informatics (BHI), Pittsburgh, PA, USA, 15-18 October 2023; pp. 1-7.
  13. Nia, N.G.; Kaplanoglu, E.; Nasab, A.; Qin, H. Human Activity Recognition Using Machine Learning Algorithms Based on IMU Data. In Proceedings of the 2023 5th International Conference on Bio-Engineering for Smart Technologies (BioSMART), Paris, France, 7-9 June 2023; pp. 1-8.
  14. Nia, N.G.; Nasab, A.; Kaplanoglu, E. Reinforcement Learning-Based Grasp Pattern Control of Upper Limb Prosthetics in an AI Platform. In Proceedings of the 2022 3rd International Informatics and Software Engineering Conference (IISEC), Ankara, Turkey, 15-16 December 2022; pp. 1-4.
  15. Sun, C.; Kumarasamy, V.K.; Liang, Y.; Wu, D.; Wang, Y. Using a Layered Ensemble of Physics-Guided Graph Attention Networks to Predict COVID-19 Trends. Appl. Artif. Intell. 2022, 36, 2055989. [CrossRef] · DOI
  16. Hassan, Y.; Sartipi, M. ChattSpeed: Toward a New Dataset for Single Camera Visual Speed Estimation for Urban Testbeds. In Proceedings of the 2023 IEEE International Conference on Big Data (BigData), Sorrento, Italy, 15-18 December 2023; pp. 2598-2605. [CrossRef] · DOI
  17. Hassan, Y.; Zhao, J.; Harris, A.; Sartipi, M. Deep Learning-Based Framework for Traffic Estimation for the MLK Smart Corridor in Downtown Chattanooga, TN. In Proceedings of the 2023 IEEE 26th International Conference on Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITSC), Bilbao, Spain, 24-28 September 2023; pp. 4564-4570. [CrossRef] · DOI
  18. Chu, T.; Chinchali, S.; Katti, S. Multi-agent Reinforcement Learning for Networked System Control. arXiv 2020, arXiv:2004.01339. · arXiv
  19. Wang, Y.; Xu, T.; Niu, X.; Tan, C.; Chen, E.; Xiong, H. STMARL: A spatio-temporal multi-agent reinforcement learning approach for cooperative traffic light control. IEEE Trans. Mob. Comput. 2020, 21, 2228-2242. [CrossRef] · DOI
  20. Chu, T.; Wang, J.; Codecà, L.; Li, Z. Multi-agent deep reinforcement learning for large-scale traffic signal control. IEEE Trans. Intell. Transp. Syst. 2019, 21, 1086-1095. [CrossRef] · DOI · Paper page
  21. Khaleghian, S.; Neema, H.; Sartipi, M.; Tran, T.; Sen, R.; Dubey, A. Calibrating Real-World City Traffic Simulation Model Using Vehicle Speed Data. In Proceedings of the 2023 IEEE International Conference on Smart Computing (SMARTCOMP), Nashville, TN, USA, 26-30 June 2023; pp. 303-308. [CrossRef] · DOI
  22. Gurjanov, A.; Zakoldaev, D.; Shukalov, A.; Zharinov, I. Formation principles of Digital Twins of Cyber-Physical Systems in the smart factories of Industry 4.0. IOP Conf. Ser. Mater. Sci. Eng. 2019, 483, 012070. [CrossRef] · DOI
  23. Leng, J.; Wang, D.; Shen, W.; Li, X.; Liu, Q.; Chen, X. Digital Twins-based smart manufacturing system design in Industry 4.0: A review. J. Manuf. Syst. 2021, 60, 119-137. [CrossRef] · DOI
  24. Stavropoulos, P.; Mourtzis, D. Digital Twins in industry 4.0. In Design and Operation of Production Networks for Mass Personalization in the Era of Cloud Technology; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2022; pp. 277-316.
  25. Wagner, R.; Schleich, B.; Haefner, B.; Kuhnle, A.; Wartzack, S.; Lanza, G. Challenges and potentials of Digital Twins and industry 4.0 in product design and production for high performance products. Procedia CIRP 2019, 84, 88-93. [CrossRef] · DOI
  26. Schluse, M.; Priggemeyer, M.; Atorf, L.; Rossmann, J. Experimentable Digital Twins-Streamlining simulation-based systems engineering for industry 4.0. IEEE Trans. Ind. Inform. 2018, 14, 1722-1731. [CrossRef] · DOI
  27. Cinar, Z.M.; Nuhu, A.A.; Zeeshan, Q.; Korhan, O. Digital Twins for industry 4.0: A review. In Proceedings of the Industrial Engineering in the Digital Disruption Era: Selected Papers from the Global Joint Conference on Industrial Engineering and Its Application Areas, GJCIE 2019, Gazimagusa, Turkey, 2-3 September 2019; Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2020; pp. 193-203.
  28. Jiang, Y.; Yin, S.; Li, K.; Luo, H.; Kaynak, O. Industrial applications of Digital Twins. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. A 2021, 379, 20200360. [CrossRef] [PubMed] · DOI
  29. Sahal, R.; Alsamhi, S.H.; Brown, K.N.; O'shea, D.; McCarthy, C.; Guizani, M. Blockchain-empowered Digital Twins collaboration: Smart transportation use case. Machines 2021, 9, 193. [CrossRef] · DOI
  30. Kosacka-Olejnik, M.; Kostrzewski, M.; Marczewska, M.; Mrówczy ńska, B.; Pawlewski, P. How Digital Twin concept supports internal transport systems?-Literature review. Energies 2021, 14, 4919. [CrossRef] · DOI
  31. Schwarz, C.; Wang, Z. The role of Digital Twins in connected and automated vehicles. IEEE Intell. Transp. Syst. Mag. 2022, 14, 41-51. [CrossRef] · DOI
  32. Samuel, P.; Saini, A.; Poongodi, T.; Nancy, P. Artificial intelligence-driven Digital Twins in Industry 4.0. In Digital Twin for Smart Manufacturing; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2023; pp. 59-88.
  33. Fedorko, G.; Molnar, V.; Vasil', M.; Salai, R. Proposal of Digital Twin for testing and measuring of transport belts for pipe conveyors within the concept Industry 4.0. Measurement 2021, 174, 108978. [CrossRef] · DOI
  34. Novák, P.; Vyskočil, J. Digitalized Automation Engineering of Industry 4.0 Production Systems and Their Tight Cooperation with Digital Twins. Processes 2022, 10, 404. [CrossRef] · DOI
  35. Aheleroff, S.; Xu, X.; Zhong, R.Y.; Lu, Y. Digital Twin as a Service (DTaaS) in Industry 4.0: An Architecture Reference Model. Adv. Eng. Inform. 2021, 47, 101225. [CrossRef] · DOI
  36. Bhatti, G.; Mohan, H.; Raja Singh, R. Towards the future of smart electric vehicles: Digital Twin technology. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2021, 141, 110801. [CrossRef] · DOI
  37. Deryabin, S.A.; Temkin, I.O.; Zykov, S.V. About some issues of developing Digital Twins for the intelligent process control in quarries. In Proceedings of the 24th International Conference on Knowledge-Based and Intelligent Information & Engineering Systems, KES2020, Virtual, 16-18 September 2020; Procedia Computer Science; Volume 176, pp. 3210-3216. [CrossRef] · DOI
  38. Farsi, M.; Daneshkhah, A.; Hosseinian-Far, A.; Jahankhani, H. (Eds.) Digital Twin Technologies and Smart Cities; Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2020.
  39. Jones, D.; Snider, C.; Nassehi, A.; Yon, J.; Hicks, B. Characterising the Digital Twin: A systematic literature review. CIRP J. Manuf. Sci. Technol. 2020, 29, 36-52. [CrossRef] · DOI · Paper page
  40. Liu, M.; Fang, S.; Dong, H.; Xu, C. Review of Digital Twin about concepts, technologies, and industrial applications. J. Manuf. Syst. 2021, 58, 346-361. [CrossRef] · DOI
  41. Kaur, M.J.; Mishra, V.P.; Maheshwari, P. The convergence of Digital Twin, IoT, and machine learning: Transforming data into action. In Digital Twin Technologies and Smart Cities; Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2020; pp. 3-17.
  42. Rasheed, A.; San, O.; Kvamsdal, T. Digital Twin: Values, challenges and enablers from a modeling perspective. IEEE Access 2020, 8, 21980-22012. [CrossRef] · DOI · Paper page
  43. Boschert, S.; Rosen, R. Digital Twin-the simulation aspect. In Mechatronic Futures: Challenges and Solutions for Mechatronic Systems and Their Designers; Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2016; pp. 59-74.
  44. Bao, L.; Wang, Q.; Jiang, Y. Review of Digital Twin for intelligent transportation system. In Proceedings of the 2021 International Conference on Information Control, Electrical Engineering and Rail Transit (ICEERT), Lanzhou, China, 30 October-1 November 2021; pp. 309-315.
  45. Saroj, A.J.; Roy, S.; Guin, A.; Hunter, M. Development of a connected corridor real-time data-driven traffic Digital Twin simulation model. J. Transp. Eng. Part A Syst. 2021, 147, 04021096. [CrossRef] · DOI
  46. Rudskoy, A.; Ilin, I.; Prokhorov, A. Digital Twins in the intelligent transport systems. Transp. Res. Procedia 2021, 54, 927-935. [CrossRef] · DOI
  47. Zhang, K.; Cao, J.; Zhang, Y. Adaptive Digital Twin and multiagent deep reinforcement learning for vehicular edge computing and networks. IEEE Trans. Ind. Inform. 2021, 18, 1405-1413. [CrossRef] · DOI
  48. Dasgupta, S.; Rahman, M.; Lidbe, A.D.; Lu, W.; Jones, S. A Transportation Digital-Twin Approach for Adaptive Traffic Control Systems. arXiv 2021, arXiv:2109.10863. · arXiv
  49. Chen, D.; Lv, Z. Artificial intelligence enabled Digital Twins for training autonomous cars. Internet Things Cyber-Phys. Syst. 2022, 2, 31-41. [CrossRef] · DOI
  50. Kumar, S.A.; Madhumathi, R.; Chelliah, P.R.; Tao, L.; Wang, S. A novel Digital Twin-centric approach for driver intention prediction and traffic congestion avoidance. J. Reliab. Intell. Environ. 2018, 4, 199-209. [CrossRef] · DOI
  51. Wang, X.; Ma, L.; Li, H.; Yin, Z.; Luan, T.; Cheng, N. Digital Twin-Assisted Efficient Reinforcement Learning for Edge Task Scheduling. In Proceedings of the 2022 IEEE 95th Vehicular Technology Conference:(VTC2022-Spring), Helsinki, Finland, 19-22 June 2022; pp. 1-5.
  52. Xia, K.; Sacco, C.; Kirkpatrick, M.; Saidy, C.; Nguyen, L.; Kircaliali, A.; Harik, R. A Digital Twin to train deep reinforcement learning agent for smart manufacturing plants: Environment, interfaces and intelligence. J. Manuf. Syst. 2021, 58, 210-230. [CrossRef] · DOI
  53. Pandit, K.; Ghosal, D.; Zhang, H.M.; Chuah, C.N. Adaptive traffic signal control with vehicular ad hoc networks. IEEE Trans. Veh. Technol. 2013, 62, 1459-1471. [CrossRef] · DOI
  54. Cao, M.; Li, V.O.; Shuai, Q. Book Your Green Wave: Exploiting Navigation Information for Intelligent Traffic Signal Control. IEEE Trans. Veh. Technol. 2022, 71, 8225-8236. [CrossRef] · DOI
  55. Guo, Q.; Li, L.; Ban, X.J. Urban traffic signal control with connected and automated vehicles: A survey. Transp. Res. Part C Emerg. Technol. 2019, 101, 313-334. [CrossRef] · DOI
  56. Jiang, X.; Jin, Y.; Ma, Y. Dynamic phase signal control method for unstable asymmetric traffic flow at intersections. J. Adv. Transp. 2021, 2021, 8843921. [CrossRef] · DOI
  57. Maroto, J.; Delso, E.; Felez, J.; Cabanellas, J.M. Real-time traffic simulation with a microscopic model. IEEE Trans. Intell. Transp. Syst. 2006, 7, 513-527. [CrossRef] · DOI
  58. Saroj, A.J.; Hunter, M.; Roy, S.; Guin, A. A Three-Tier Incremental Approach for Development of Smart Corridor Digital Twins. In Proceedings of the 2023 IEEE 26th International Symposium on Real-Time Distributed Computing (ISORC), Nashville, TN, USA, 23-25 May 2023; pp. 214-219.
  59. Rudowsky, I. Intelligent agents. Commun. Assoc. Inf. Syst. 2004, 14, 14. [CrossRef] · DOI
  60. Iyer, L.S. AI enabled applications towards intelligent transportation. Transp. Eng. 2021, 5, 100083. [CrossRef] · DOI · Paper page
  61. Schleiffer, R. Intelligent agents in traffic and transportation. Transp. Res. Part Emerg. Technol. 2002, 10, 325-329. [CrossRef] · DOI
  62. Sadek, A.; Basha, N. Self-learning intelligent agents for dynamic traffic routing on transportation networks. In Unifying Themes in Complex Systems: Proceedings of the Sixth International Conference on Complex Systems, Boston, MA, USA, 25-30 June 2006; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2010; pp. 503-510.
  63. Roozemond, D.A. Using intelligent agents for pro-active, real-time urban intersection control. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 2001, 131, 293-301. [CrossRef] · DOI
  64. Zhu, L.; Yu, F.R.; Wang, Y.; Ning, B.; Tang, T. Big data analytics in intelligent transportation systems: A survey. IEEE Trans. Intell. Transp. Syst. 2018, 20, 383-398. [CrossRef] · DOI
  65. Roozemond, D.A. Using autonomous intelligent agents for urban traffic control systems. In Proceedings of the 6th World Congress on Intelligent Transport Systems (Its), Toronto, ON, Canada, 8-12 November 1999.
  66. Nguyen, T.T.; Nguyen, H.H.; Sartipi, M.; Fisichella, M. Multi-Vehicle Multi-Camera Tracking with Graph-Based Tracklet Features. IEEE Trans. Multimed. 2023, 26, 972-983. [CrossRef] · DOI
  67. Nguyen, T.T.; Nguyen, H.H.; Sartipi, M.; Fisichella, M. Real-time multi-vehicle multi-camera tracking with graph-based tracklet features. Transp. Res. Rec. 2024, 2678, 296-308. [CrossRef] · DOI
  68. Li, J.; Ma, H.; Zhang, Z.; Li, J.; Tomizuka, M. Spatio-temporal graph dual-attention network for multi-agent prediction and tracking. IEEE Trans. Intell. Transp. Syst. 2021, 23, 10556-10569. [CrossRef] · DOI
  69. Palit, J.R. Application of Machine Learning and Deep Learning Approaches for Traffic Operation and Safety Assessment at Signalized Intersections. Master's Thesis, University of Tennessee at Chattanooga, Chattanooga, TN, USA, 2022.
  70. Protogerou, A.; Papadopoulos, S.; Drosou, A.; Tzovaras, D.; Refanidis, I. A graph neural network method for distributed anomaly detection in IoT. Evol. Syst. 2021, 12, 19-36. [CrossRef] · DOI
  71. Basmassi, M.A.; Boudaakat, S.; Chentoufi, J.A.; Benameur, L.; Rebbani, A.; Bouattane, O. Evolutionary reinforcement learning multi-agents system for intelligent traffic light control: New approach and case of study. Int. J. Electr. Comput. Eng. 2022, 12, 5519. [CrossRef] · DOI
  72. Xu, M.; Wu, J.; Huang, L.; Zhou, R.; Wang, T.; Hu, D. Network-wide traffic signal control based on the discovery of critical nodes and deep reinforcement learning. J. Intell. Transp. Syst. 2020, 24, 1-10. [CrossRef] · DOI
  73. Ge, H.; Gao, D.; Sun, L.; Hou, Y.; Yu, C.; Wang, Y.; Tan, G. Multi-agent transfer reinforcement learning with multi-view encoder for adaptive traffic signal control. IEEE Trans. Intell. Transp. Syst. 2021, 23, 12572-12587. [CrossRef] · DOI
  74. Zhu, R.; Li, L.; Wu, S.; Lv, P.; Li, Y.; Xu, M. Multi-agent broad reinforcement learning for intelligent traffic light control. Inf. Sci. 2023, 619, 509-525. [CrossRef] · DOI
  75. Jin, G.; Wang, M.; Zhang, J.; Sha, H.; Huang, J. STGNN-TTE: Travel time estimation via spatial-temporal graph neural network. Future Gener. Comput. Syst. 2022, 126, 70-81. [CrossRef] · DOI
  76. Harris, A.; Stovall, J.; Sartipi, M. Mlk smart corridor: An urban testbed for smart city applications. In Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Big Data, Los Angeles, CA, USA, 9-12 December 2019; pp. 3506-3511.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kumarasamy, V. K., Saroj, A. J., Liang, Y., Wu, D., Hunter, M. P., Guin, A., & Sartipi, M.
Affiliations
  • University of Tennessee at Chattanooga (US)
  • Oak Ridge National Laboratory (US)
  • Georgia Institute of Technology (US)
Corresponding author
  • Liang, Yu
  • Wu, Dalei
Venue
Symmetry
Publisher
MDPI AG
Published
2024-04-07
Volume
16
Issue
4
Pages
448
ISSN
2073-8994 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4394567203
Cited by
41
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 18 · 2025: 18 · 2024: 5
FWCI
6.43
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Symmetry (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • UTC Scholar (University of Tennessee at Chattanooga) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
  • OSTI OAI (U.S. Department of Energy Office of Scientific and Technical Information) (submittedVersion)
  • OSTI OAI (U.S. Department of Energy Office of Scientific and Technical Information) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
U.S. Department of Energy’s Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) (DE-EE0009208)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Control and Systems Engineering › Traffic control and management
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Building and Construction › Traffic Prediction and Management Techniques
  • Social Sciences › Transportation › Transportation Planning and Optimization
Keywords
traffic signal control, graph-based reinforcement learning, digital twin, traffic congestion reduction, fuel consumption, actuated signal control, traffic simulation, VISSIM, peak hour traffic

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review