Cited by 154Domain Adaptation and Few-Shot LearningAdvanced Neural Network ApplicationsMachine Learning and Algorithms

A Survey on Contrastive Self-Supervised Learning

Open access
Jaiswal, Ashish, Babu, Ashwin Ramesh, Zadeh, Mohammad Zaki, Banerjee, Debapriya, Makedon, Fillia·2020·Technologies

Abstract

Self-supervised learning has gained popularity because of its ability to avoid the cost of annotating large-scale datasets. It is capable of adopting self-defined pseudolabels as supervision and use the learned representations for several downstream tasks. Specifically, contrastive learning has recently become a dominant component in self-supervised learning for computer vision, natural language processing (NLP), and other domains. It aims at embedding augmented versions of the same sample close to each other while trying to push away embeddings from different samples. This paper provides an extensive review of self-supervised methods that follow the contrastive approach. The work explains commonly used pretext tasks in a contrastive learning setup, followed by different architectures that have been proposed so far. Next, we present a performance comparison of different methods for multiple downstream tasks such as image classification, object detection, and action recognition. Finally, we conclude with the limitations of the current methods and the need for further techniques and future directions to make meaningful progress.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3390/technologies9010002

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Pretext tasks can be applied to any type of data, such as images, audio, and video.

    “The pretext task can be applied to any type of data, such as images, audio, video, and so on [5].”

    From Self-supervised learning: A succinct review (2023) · cites this paper as [5]

  • In pretext tasks, pseudo labels are generated automatically from dataset attributes and are used for classification, detection, and segmentation.

    “In pretext tasks, pseudo labels are used for representations that were generated automatically by taking into account the attributes of the dataset. These pseudo labels are then used for classification, detection, and segmentation [5].”

    From Self-supervised learning: A succinct review (2023) · cites this paper as [5]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 71 · Cited by 154

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Kiros, R.; Zhu, Y.; Salakhutdinov, R.R.; Zemel, R.; Urtasun, R.; Torralba, A.; Fidler, S. Skip-thought vectors. Adv. Neural Inf. Process. Syst. 2015, 28, 3294-3302.
  2. Mikolov, T.; Sutskever, I.; Chen, K.; Corrado, G.S.; Dean, J. Distributed representations of words and phrases and their compositionality. Adv. Neural Inf. Process. Syst. 2013, 26, 3111-3119.

Authors
Jaiswal, A., Babu, A. R., Zadeh, M. Z., Banerjee, D., & Makedon, F.
Affiliations
The University of Texas at Arlington (US)
Corresponding author
Jaiswal, Ashish
Venue
Technologies
Publisher
MDPI AG
Published
2020-12-28
Volume
9
Issue
1
Pages
2
ISSN
2227-7080 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3097606775
Cited by
154
References
71
Citations by year
2026: 32 · 2025: 19 · 2024: 35 · 2023: 33 · 2022: 30 · 2021: 5
FWCI
6.68
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Technologies (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (cc-by)
Funders
National Science Foundation (1565328, 1719031)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Domain Adaptation and Few-Shot Learning
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Advanced Neural Network Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Machine Learning and Algorithms
Keywords
self-supervised contrastive learning, contrastive learning, self-supervised learning, pretext tasks, representation learning, image classification, object detection, human action recognition, computer vision, natural language processing

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review