The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Food Poisoning and Staphylococcus aureus Enterotoxins
Open accessAbstract
Staphylococcus aureus produces a wide variety of toxins including staphylococcal enterotoxins (SEs; SEA to SEE, SEG to SEI, SER to SET) with demonstrated emetic activity, and staphylococcal-like (SEl) proteins, which are not emetic in a primate model (SElL and SElQ) or have yet to be tested (SElJ, SElK, SElM to SElP, SElU, SElU2 and SElV). SEs and SEl s have been traditionally subdivided into classical (SEA to SEE) and new (SEG to SElU2) types. All possess superantigenic activity and are encoded by accessory genetic elements, including plasmids, prophages, pathogenicity islands, νSa genomic islands, or by genes located next to the staphylococcal cassette chromosome (SCC) implicated in methicillin resistance. SEs are a major cause of food poisoning, which typically occurs after ingestion of different foods, particularly processed meat and dairy products, contaminated with S. aureus by improper handling and subsequent storage at elevated temperatures. Symptoms are of rapid onset and include nausea and violent vomiting, with or without diarrhea. The illness is usually self-limiting and only occasionally it is severe enough to warrant hospitalization. SEA is the most common cause of staphylococcal food poisoning worldwide, but the involvement of other classical SEs has been also demonstrated. Of the new SE/SEls, only SEH have clearly been associated with food poisoning. However, genes encoding novel SEs as well as SEls with untested emetic activity are widely represented in S. aureus, and their role in pathogenesis may be underestimated.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
van Wamel, W. J. B., Rooijakkers, S. H. M., Ruyken, M., van Kessel, K. P. M., & van Strijp, J. A. G. (2006) · Journal of Bacteriology · doi:10.1128/jb.188.4.1310-1315.2006 · Cited by 579
Cited by
Prevalence and Characterization of Staphylococcus aureus Isolated From Retail Vegetables in China
Wu, S., Huang, J., Wu, Q., Zhang, F., Zhang, J., Lei, T., Chen, M., Ding, Y., & Xue, L. (2018) · Frontiers in Microbiology · doi:10.3389/fmicb.2018.01263 · Cited by 77
Aung, M., San, T., Aye, M., Mya, S., Maw, W., Zan, K., Htut, W., Kawaguchiya, M., Urushibara, N., & Kobayashi, N. (2017) · Toxins · doi:10.3390/toxins9080241 · Cited by 72
Revealing the microbial heritage of traditional Brazilian cheeses through metagenomics
Kothe, C. I., Mohellibi, N., & Renault, P. (2022) · Food Research International · doi:10.1016/j.foodres.2022.111265 · Cited by 51
Camargo, A. C., Costa, E. A., Fusieger, A., Freitas, R. D., Nero, L. A., & Carvalho, A. F. D. (2021) · Food Research International · doi:10.1016/j.foodres.2020.109803 · Cited by 27
Madilo, F. K., Islam, M. N., Letsyo, E., Roy, N., Klutse, C. M., Quansah, E., Darku, P. A., & Amin, M. B. (2023) · Heliyon · doi:10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e17795 · Cited by 21
Metadata
- Authors
- Argudín, M. Á., Mendoza, M. C., & Rodicio, M. R.
- Venue
- Toxins
- Publisher
- MDPI AG
- Published
- 2010-07-05
- Volume
- 2
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 1751-1773
- ISSN
- 2072-6651 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2042182233
- Cited by
- 1,161
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 15.37
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Food Poisoning and Staphylococcus aureus Enterotoxins. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.3390/toxins2071751
- The paper
- Argudín, M. Á., Mendoza, M. C., & Rodicio, M. R. (2010). Food Poisoning and Staphylococcus aureus Enterotoxins. Toxins. https://doi.org/10.3390/toxins2071751
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.