The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
HostPhinder: A Phage Host Prediction Tool
Open accessAbstract
The current dramatic increase of antibiotic resistant bacteria has revitalised the interest in bacteriophages as alternative antibacterial treatment. Meanwhile, the development of bioinformatics methods for analysing genomic data places high-throughput approaches for phage characterization within reach. Here, we present HostPhinder, a tool aimed at predicting the bacterial host of phages by examining the phage genome sequence. Using a reference database of 2196 phages with known hosts, HostPhinder predicts the host species of a query phage as the host of the most genomically similar reference phages. As a measure of genomic similarity the number of co-occurring k-mers (DNA sequences of length k) is used. Using an independent evaluation set, HostPhinder was able to correctly predict host genus and species for 81% and 74% of the phages respectively, giving predictions for more phages than BLAST and significantly outperforming BLAST on phages for which both had predictions. HostPhinder predictions on phage draft genomes from the INTESTI phage cocktail corresponded well with the advertised targets of the cocktail. Our study indicates that for most phages genomic similarity correlates well with related bacterial hosts. HostPhinder is available as an interactive web service [1] and as a stand alone download from the Docker registry [2].
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
A fast, lock-free approach for efficient parallel counting of occurrences of k -mers
Marçais, G., & Kingsford, C. (2011) · Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btr011 · Cited by 4,661
Kraken: ultrafast metagenomic sequence classification using exact alignments
Wood, D. E., & Salzberg, S. L. (2014) · Genome Biology · doi:10.1186/gb-2014-15-3-r46 · Cited by 4,521
Cited by
Minimum Information about an Uncultivated Virus Genome (MIUViG)
Roux, S., Adriaenssens, E. M., Dutilh, B. E., Koonin, E. V., Kropinski, A. M., Krupovic, M., Kuhn, J. H., Lavigne, R., Brister, J. R., Varsani, A., et al. (2019) · Nature Biotechnology · doi:10.1038/nbt.4306 · Cited by 732
Roux, S., Camargo, A. P., Coutinho, F. H., Dabdoub, S. M., Dutilh, B. E., Nayfach, S., & Tritt, A. (2023) · PLOS Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.3002083 · Cited by 466
Genetic determinants of host tropism in Klebsiella phages
Beamud, B., García-González, N., Gómez-Ortega, M., González-Candelas, F., Domingo-Calap, P., & Sanjuan, R. (2023) · Cell Reports · doi:10.1016/j.celrep.2023.112048 · Cited by 113
Bacteriophage Therapy: Discovery, Development, and FDA Approval Pathways
Niazi, S. K. (2025) · Pharmaceuticals · doi:10.3390/ph18081115 · Cited by 56
Metadata
- Authors
- Villarroel, J., Kleinheinz, K., Jurtz, V., Zschach, H., Lund, O., Nielsen, M., & Larsen, M.
- Venue
- Viruses
- Publisher
- MDPI AG
- Published
- 2016-05-04
- Volume
- 8
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 116
- ISSN
- 1999-4915 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2345960958
- Cited by
- 162
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 8.23
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: HostPhinder: A Phage Host Prediction Tool. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.3390/v8050116
- The paper
- Villarroel, J., Kleinheinz, K., Jurtz, V., Zschach, H., Lund, O., Nielsen, M., & Larsen, M. (2016). HostPhinder: A Phage Host Prediction Tool. Viruses. https://doi.org/10.3390/v8050116
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.